
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This one is about what I learned.
Because eventually, you reach a point where you have to decide whether the worst experiences of your career are simply going to remain scars...
Completed and near-completed developments moved into enforcement.
Receivers and administrators took control.
If you search my name online, look through Companies House, or examine some of the companies I've directed, you'll find a difficult period in my career.
Today I want to talk about something that matters more than almost anything else in investing.
Cycles.
Because markets move.
Conditions change.Confidence rises and falls.Capital flows in… and out.
Today I want to talk about scale.
Because when people hear about deploying capital across multiple development projects, the immediate assumption is:
More projects… means more risk.
Today I want to talk about something very specific within the Rise Capital model.
The type of developments we target…
And why we’ve made a deliberate decision to focus on smaller housing schemes — typically houses and townhouses, not apartments, and usually schemes of 20 units or fewer.
Today I want to talk about something very specific.
Not governance in general.
But how we’ve structured the investment and decision-making process at Rise Capital — and more importantly, why we’ve built it that way.
Today I want to talk about something that sits right at the centre of the pre-seed opportunity.
Because for many investors, the natural reaction to buying into an asset management platform at an early stage is straightforward.
Today, I want to speak more directly than I usually do.
Not about the market in general.Not about abstract capital theory.And not about property as a broad asset class.
Up to now, we’ve spent a lot of time talking about how capital behaves, why structure matters, and what separates institutional investment platforms from individual deals.
Today, I want to bring that together in a more practical way.
From the publisher's feed