Better Minneapolis Podcast

Council Member Andrea Jenkins has long been a distinctive voice in Ward 8 and across Minneapolis. In this interview, we discuss a range of issues that continue to shape the city. Though she’s not seeking re-election, Jenkins speaks with clarity and conviction about the challenges facing residents—and the limitations of what City Hall can realistically deliver.

While attention is currently fixed on the Ward 10 DFL convention scheduled for May 31, it’s this year’s budget process—already underway—that will shape the city’s direction in 2026. Incumbents like Jenkins still hold considerable influence.

As voters listen to candidates and consider endorsements, it’s worth pressing all of them—newcomers and incumbents alike—on how they plan to prioritize resources. The last-minute deal-making and political maneuvering we experienced in 2024 left many residents frustrated. Will this year be any different?

Local News Note: Why Your Support Matters

Local news is shrinking in Minneapolis. On May 12, Southwest Voices publisher Charlie Rybak announced the layoff of the outlet’s two paid editors, Melody Hoffman and Brianna Kelly. The newsletter will continue in some form, but Rybak is openly grappling with how to make the model sustainable.

This event raises questions about the future—not just for Southwest Voices, but for Better Minneapolis and local journalism more broadly. Interviewing local leaders, covering conventions and forums, and tracking city spending all take time and persistence. Unfortunately, the Minnesota Star Tribune devotes limited attention to city politics and is facing its own financial pressures. Southwest Voices relied on a mix of ads, foundation grants, and subscriptions—when any one of those falters, the whole model is at risk.

When I launched this newsletter, I didn’t know how it would sustain itself. My goal was simply to reflect voices and perspectives too often missing from mainstream coverage and online debate. Readership has grown exponentially, but paid subscriptions have not kept pace.

Foundation support would help. I’ve been reluctant to seek ads—selling, formatting, and managing them would be a job unto itself. Hiring a person to solicit advertising would likely consume any new revenue.

If you value what Better Minneapolis provides—independent reporting and commentary focused on local government—I ask you to consider becoming a paid subscriber.

There’s always a temptation to pivot toward national politics or broader state issues. Those topics might attract more readers and subscriptions. But I’d rather stay focused on Minneapolis: covering what happens here and holding local leaders accountable.

Thanks for reading, commenting, and being part of this work.

Outline of the Interview with Andrea Jenkins

I. Introduction and Personal Banter

II. Ward 8 Updates and Community Context

* Jenkins expresses deep ties to Ward 8 through years of service.

* Discusses redistricting and its effect on recent and current elections.

III. George Floyd Square and 5th Anniversary Events

* Events organized by Rise and Remember: gala, festival, and religious ceremony.

* National and international media interest in the square and ongoing changes.

* Jenkins highlights Minneapolis as a national barometer for racial justice.

IV. Public Safety and Police Reform

* Impact of state consent decree and reforms:

* Mental health response integration.

* Violence interrupters (implementation challenges and need for metrics).

* Encouraging recruitment trends and monitoring group (LIPA) showing positive signs.

* Community trust remains fragile.

V. Controversy Over George Floyd Square Design Plans

* Frustration over council opposition to reopening the intersection.

* Majority community support (per surveys) for a hybrid solution allowing transit flow.

* Political motivations speculated (council vs. mayor dynamics).

VI. Reflections on City Council Work

* Challenges of synthesizing diverse voices into cohesive policy.

* Laments erosion of compromise in current council, rise of ideological rigidity.

* Strong support for the strong mayor system for clearer accountability.

VII. Housing and Rent Stabilization

* Minneapolis progress on affordable housing and rent stabilization compared to St. Paul.

* Predicts only ~35% chance rent stabilization will resurface post-2025 election.

* Advocates for continued strategic goal setting beyond five-year-old priorities.

VIII. Minneapolis DFL and Endorsement Process

* Notes confusion and criticism over DFL endorsements and DSA influence.

* Jenkins sees a political shift further left post-COVID and post-Floyd.

IX. Budget Priorities and Collaboration

* Anticipates a difficult 2025 budget process due to election-year politics.

* Jenkins prioritizes:

* George Floyd Square redevelopment

* Affordable housing and homelessness

* Stresses budgeting based on community needs, not ideology.

X. Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI)

* Strong ongoing support for GBI.

* Emphasizes its success during pilot phase using ARPA funds.

* Concerns about proposed income taxes on $200k+ households.

XI. Clarifying City vs. County Responsibilities

* City responsible for infrastructure and public safety.

* County responsible for health, homelessness, social services.

* Advocates for more collaboration and better alignment of roles to prevent duplication.

XII. Closing Reflections

* Jenkins urges incoming councilmembers to prioritize 38th Street and George Floyd Square.

* Hopes for continued efforts on racial healing, economic revitalization, and basic income programs.

* Ends with shared support for pragmatic, data-driven policymaking over ideological purity.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

In this interview, we explore the values and perspective of Mariam DeMello, a candidate for Minneapolis City Council in Ward 11. She begins by noting that she is not a political insider—and expressed surprise that, until recently, there was only one person running to replace outgoing Council Member Emily Koski.

DeMello’s opponent, Jamison Whiting, declined an interview request, stating that his focus is on the upcoming DFL convention on May 31. Prior to this conversation, we knew little about DeMello and were curious to hear what she stands for. Regardless of who secures the DFL endorsement, Ward 11 voters appear set to choose between two relatively moderate candidates—a rarity on the Minneapolis spectrum.

Race Update

One reason the Ward 11 race has remained under the radar is the absence of a Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)–endorsed candidate. In contrast, wards where progressive moderates face challengers from the party’s further-left flank have attracted more scrutiny and urgency.

We spent much of May 10 at the Ward 7 DFL convention, held at Anwatin Middle School, providing live commentary for paid subscribers. The event was contentious. After a dispute over delegate seating, Elizabeth Shaffer secured the endorsement with just over 60% of the vote in the second round—earning 222 votes to Katie Cashman’s 142. Paula Chesley, who ran a strong campaign, received 23 votes in the first round before exiting the race and releasing her delegates—support that proved decisive in securing Shaffer’s victory.

The Ward 7 contest is likely the most closely watched in this election cycle. Cashman had prominent backers, including Keith Ellison and other DFL elite, who appeared at the convention wearing her campaign shirt. It remains to be seen whether he—and others who endorsed Cashman—will now stand behind the DFL-endorsed candidate.

Elsewhere, Michael Rainville received the Ward 3 endorsement with 74% of the vote, concluding his convention without controversy. In contrast, the Ward 7 proceedings dragged on for more than six hours. Frustrations over seating delays, hunger, and fatigue contributed to the tension in the room. The volunteers managing the convention performed admirably under difficult conditions. Still, the recurring disputes over delegate credentials suggest deeper flaws in the caucus and convention process. Reform is overdue.

During the Ward 7 event, we sent a note to DeMello encouraging her campaign to prepare for similar procedural conflicts. Every team needs someone fluent in DFL convention rules. Challenges will arise on the floor—plan for them.

One encouraging aspect of the conventions is the chance for neighbors to connect. These gatherings may breed political conflict, but they also bring together people who share the same city, even if not the same views.

“And” Versus “Or”

Shaffer’s win in Ward 7 strengthens the DFL’s more pragmatic wing. On May 31, we’ll see whether that momentum carries into Ward 10, where Lydia Millard is mounting a serious challenge to Aisha Chughtai.

A common thread running through these races is how candidates frame key issues: as matters of “and” or “or.” Many voters see DSA-aligned candidates as approaching politics through an either/or lens: either you fully support their platform, or you’re against them. This rigid thinking mirrors tactics seen in national politics—where disagreement is treated not as difference, but as betrayal.

The more pragmatic wing of the DFL tends to frame issues differently. They speak in terms of “and.” You can be a homeowner and still want rents to remain affordable. Many homeowners were once renters themselves—and have children, relatives, or friends who rent. You can be frustrated by rising property taxes and insurance premiums, and still want your neighbors to afford stable housing on a living wage.

The same applies to labor. You can want businesses to thrive and support unions that fight for healthcare, fair wages, and predictable schedules. You can advocate for “workers”—a term so broad it includes nearly everyone—and also stand with small business owners who want their employees and customers to feel safe. You can support police officers and also expect them to be well-trained, fair, and impartial when exercising their authority.

The real differences in Minneapolis politics are often differences of degree. But when those differences are framed as absolutes, they harden into ideology. That rigidity blocks progress. Either/or thinking creates an enemy class—those outside the group lose their individuality and become a target. The result is often needless cruelty and a level of political hostility that turns people away from public life.

As we enter five more months of campaigning, let’s hope the focus shifts to the ideas that will define Minneapolis for the next five years—and beyond. Our debates are necessary. Our differences are real. But solutions will only rise if we recognize that every resident has a stake in this city’s future. We all lose if this election divides us into camps that see one another as enemies.

Mariam DeMello Interview Summary

I. Introduction

* Mariam introduces herself as a political outsider and lifelong Minneapolis resident.

* Expresses love for Ward 11 and motivation to stay despite concerns about the city’s direction.

II. Background and Qualifications

* Past roles with the City of Minneapolis: Regulatory Services, City Attorney’s Office.

* Current role with Mayor Melvin Carter’s administration in St. Paul.

* Charter Commission member.

* Strong civic and legal background but no previous political office.

III. Motivations for Running

* Concern over lack of aligned candidates.

* Desire to protect and improve her community.

* Decision prompted by observation of city governance and policy drift.

IV. Top Campaign Priorities

1. Public Safety

* Advocates for responsive policing and adequate investigative staffing.

* Personal story: best friend severely injured in hit-and-run; police lacked capacity to investigate properly.

* Supports role for trained civilian investigators and non-police crisis response teams.

* Highlights importance of street lighting and safety infrastructure.

* Concerned about crime trends—especially among youth during summer.

* Supports youth programs, violence prevention, and mentorship initiatives.

2. Housing and Property Taxes

* Concern over rising property taxes and financial pressure on long-term homeowners.

* Advocates for more efficient city spending before tax increases.

* Frustrated with city mismanagement (e.g., double billing by nonprofits).

* Emphasizes need to protect residents on fixed incomes.

3. Infrastructure and City Services

* Basic services like street lighting, snow plowing, and rodent control are top of mind.

* Mentions increase in rat sightings as evidence of failing infrastructure.

* Calls for greater investment in core services and aging systems.

V. Views on City Council Actions

Supportive Policies

* Applauds ban on rent-pricing algorithms.

* Believes more enforcement is needed to make such policies effective.

Criticized Policies

* Opposes Safe Outdoor Spaces ordinance, viewing it as normalizing homelessness rather than offering dignified housing.

* Opposed to city resolutions on international issues like Gaza ceasefire—believes they are symbolic and waste city resources.

VI. Rent Control and Housing Solutions

* Cautious about rent control based on experience in St. Paul.

* Supports affordable housing but skeptical of overregulation that stifles development.

* Advocates “sensible zoning” and selective multi-family development while preserving neighborhood character.

* Suggests George Floyd Square redevelopment as an opportunity for housing with memorial elements.

VII. Relationship with Mayor Frey

* Supports Frey for a third term.

* Acknowledges past disagreements (e.g., slow National Guard deployment).

* Praises his work on staffing, police recruitment, and retention.

VIII. Summer Activities and Personal Interests

* Enjoys biking, rollerblading, and spending time in parks (especially Nokomis).

* Mentions fall while rollerblading and safety gear.

* Speaks fondly of Uptown, supports revitalization efforts, and shops locally.

IX. Campaign Operations

* Entirely volunteer-run campaign.

* Relies on grassroots support and is cautious about endorsements with conditions.

X. Fundraising and Endorsements

* Dislikes the influence of money in politics.

* Endorsed by Women Winning.

* Expresses concern about campaign finance and pressure from donors/unions.

* Advocates for public financing or matching systems like New York's.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

City Spending & Transparency

Steve Brandt, President of the Minneapolis Board of Estimate and Taxation, recently proposed a 1% city income tax on households earning more than $200,000 per year. In an April 27 opinion piece published in the Star Tribune, he argued this measure could raise necessary funds without further increasing property taxes.

In an interview with Better Minneapolis, Brandt acknowledged that such a tax could cause some high earners to leave the city—but he expressed optimism that others would replace them. We’re less confident that the city’s current conditions would encourage such turnover. In particular, without strong public services and a favorable business environment, the proposed tax may accelerate outmigration without equivalent offset.

One area where we found common ground was the need for a full and transparent audit of city finances. Where is the money currently being spent?

Before asking residents to pay more, city leaders must make a serious effort to rein in existing spending. Consider two recent examples:

* Traffic signal replacements: In a recent council meeting, $4.43 million was approved to replace 12 signal lights and make curb improvements—an average of $369,252 per signal.

* Convention center upgrades: Phase 3 of a remodel is underway. The lowest bid to update finishes, lighting, and fire protection in 42 meeting rooms came in at $9.89 million, or roughly $235,405 per room.

To many residents, those numbers will seem out of proportion. With the median home price in Minneapolis at $340,000, it’s fair to ask how a single traffic signal can exceed the value of a house.

If the city believes more revenue is necessary, it must first earn the public’s trust by increasing transparency, clearly defining how new tax dollars would be spent, and demonstrating a commitment to fiscal discipline.

Most residents understand that high-quality city services require investment. But there is a limit—especially when the return on that investment remains unclear. For households earning over $200,000, relocation is a realistic option. If Minneapolis wants to retain and attract these residents, it must offer compelling reasons to stay.

Election Update: DFL Endorsements and Convention Developments

Ward 2: No Endorsement Amid Procedural Disputes

The Ward 2 DFL convention concluded without endorsing a candidate. Challenger Shelley Madore garnered 53% of delegate votes, falling short of the 60% threshold required for endorsement. The convention faced legal challenges and scheduling disputes, reflecting broader tensions within the local party. ​

Ward 4: LaTrisha Vetaw Secures DFL Endorsement

Incumbent Council Member LaTrisha Vetaw received the DFL endorsement for Ward 4 with 81% of delegate support. Vetaw emphasized her commitment to public safety and community engagement in her acceptance.

Ward 12: Aurin Chowdhury Endorsed Over Becka Thompson

In Ward 12, Council Member Aurin Chowdhury secured the DFL endorsement with 78% of delegate votes, defeating challenger Becka Thompson, a current Park Board Commissioner.

Upcoming Conventions: Wards 5 and 8

The DFL conventions for Wards 5 and 8 are scheduled for Sunday, May 4. In Ward 5, with Council Member Jeremiah Ellison not seeking re-election, several candidates are vying for the endorsement. Ward 8's convention will determine the endorsement for the seat currently held by Andrea Jenkins, who is also not seeking re-election. ​

Live Chat for Paid Subscribers

A Substack live chat will be available for paid subscribers interested in real-time updates from the Ward 8 convention. The convention is set to be called to order at 1:25 PM; subscribers will receive an email notification when the chat begins.​

Here is an outline of the conversation from the Brandt podcast interview:

I. Introduction

* Brandt gives background: 49-year resident of Kingfield, 40-year Star Tribune reporter, retired and now involved in politics

II. Reflections on Journalism and Local Media

* Changes at the Star Tribune: transition to digital, loss of institutional knowledge

* Decline in local government coverage: city council and committee meetings go underreported

* Rise of online community voices; importance of vetting sources

* Host discusses role of personal perspective in newsletters and podcasts

III. Public Role and the Board of Estimate and Taxation

* Brandt’s position on the Board: overview of its origins and current role

* Sets annual property tax levy limit

* Authorizes most property-tax-backed borrowing

* Discussion of the city's budget reserves and Downtown Assets Fund

* Opportunities to offset property tax increases using sales/special tax surpluses

IV. Expanding the Downtown Tax District

* Inequity in the current boundaries (e.g., North Loop)

* Consideration of expanding geographic scope without lowering rates

* Debate over maintaining vs. reducing the 3% tax rate

V. Opinion Piece Discussion: Alternatives to Property Tax

* Problem: city relies too heavily on property taxes

* Proposal: 1% income tax on households earning over $200k

* Could raise ~$40 million annually

* Collected via state tax form with minimal administrative burden

VI. Legislative Path & Feasibility

* City Council and mayor can advocate but can’t implement tax

* Would require state legislative approval and inclusion in city’s legislative agenda

* Proposal should be researched thoroughly before 2027 session

VII. Reactions and Feasibility Concerns

* Feedback from DFL conventions largely positive

* Concerns from residents about high-earner thresholds and potential migration

* Brandt emphasizes the need for research using experiences from other jurisdictions

VIII. Broader Budget Oversight and Reform

* Call for long-term budget review and spending efficiency

* Example: St. Paul’s external audit of spending patterns

* Potential collaborators: Federal Reserve, University of Minnesota, former budget officials

IX. Alternative Revenue Ideas

* Sugary drink tax (e.g., Santa Cruz model)

* Tiered property tax structure

* Higher rates on second homes

* Regional taxation mechanisms for visitors and commuters

* Local government aid from the state – limited political viability

X. Budget Transparency and Campaign Discourse

* Lack of budget discussion among council candidates

* Importance of deeper budgeting analysis (e.g., program-based budgeting)

* Difficulty of tracking program-level spending in public documents

XI. Personal Story: Bicycle Safety

* Brandt’s bike accident from a car door opening in a bike lane

* Importance of bike infrastructure for commuter safety

XII. Stadium Financing

* Opposition to using general tax dollars for professional sports facilities

* Support for using special entertainment taxes only

* Discussion of post-convention center financing priorities

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

The DFL Ward 2 Endorsement Convention is this Saturday, May 3

Shelley Madore is seeking the DFL endorsement in Ward 2 this weekend. In a more functional party, that statement might be unremarkable. But the Minneapolis DFL has managed to complicate even the most basic part of the process: setting a date.

The convention date was changed multiple times—from May 3 to June 7, then June 1, before reverting back to May 3. A lawsuit now aims to uncover why the DFL violated its own rules in the process. This kind of maneuvering strengthens the case for eliminating caucuses and conventions in favor of a straightforward primary system.

The current Ward 2 Council Member, Robin Wonsley, a Democratic Socialist who is not seeking the DFL endorsement, has nonetheless been active in influencing the outcome. She understands that the endorsement could impact her reelection chances—and is working to prevent it from going to an opponent.

In an interview with the Minnesota Daily, Wonsley said:

“We had a handful of DFL leaders just say, ‘No, we’re going to pick a date, pick a location that excludes a large majority of our delegate base, including students and just working-class people, from fairly participating in that process.’ My campaign said immediately that’s unacceptable.”

Carol Becker, writing for the Minneapolis Times, reported:

"Despite not running for the DFL endorsement, Wonsley has been running an active campaign to turn out people to the caucuses and convention to block any DFL endorsement. This will make it easier for her to get reelected."

Wonsley is not acting alone. U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar has endorsed her over DFL candidates Shelley Madore and Michael Baskins. Omar is one of the highest-ranking Democrats in Minnesota. Her endorsement is notable given Wonsley’s affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America—a group whose platform diverges significantly from the DFL’s, advocating the abolition of capitalism, defunding the police, ending misdemeanor enforcement, and releasing all incarcerated individuals.

That Wonsley is not seeking the DFL endorsement is consistent with her platform. What’s harder to explain is why figures like Omar, Attorney General Keith Ellison, and County Commissioner Angela Conley—each prominent Democrats—are actively supporting her. Endorsing a candidate who openly opposes core elements of the DFL platform raises uncomfortable questions: Do these leaders share Wonsley’s goals of ending capitalism, defunding the police, and emptying prisons?

Will the Real DFL Member Please Stand Up?

In this context, it’s striking that Shelley Madore, a former DFL state legislator, would be denied a fair hearing by DFL insiders before the convention even occurs. If the DFL valued internal democracy, it would allow delegates to evaluate the candidates—Madore and Baskins—and decide who should carry the party banner.

Instead, when leaders like Omar and Ellison endorse before the convention, they send a clear message: party delegates’ voices don’t matter. They speak of grassroots democracy, but act as if party elites should make the decisions.

Today’s podcast features Shelley Madore so voters can hear directly from a DFL candidate seeking the endorsement. That seems a more democratic process than allowing behind-the-scenes influence to determine who’s even allowed to compete.

Here is an outline of the discussion topics covered in the interview with Shelly Madore, candidate for Minneapolis Ward 2 City Council:

I. Introduction and Background

* Personal introduction and decision to run

* Experience as a former DFL legislator in Apple Valley/Burnsville

* Community activism, especially with disability advocacy

* Work on transportation access and regional transit (35W Solutions Alliance)

II. Campaign Motivation and Vision

* Dissatisfaction with current city council leadership and governance

* Emphasis on basic services: 911 response, potholes, business support

* Importance of restoring trust in city government

III. Ward 2 Overview

* Key neighborhoods: Seward, Prospect Park, Cedar-Riverside, etc.

* Strong neighborhood associations and community engagement

* Demographic insights and low 2023 voter turnout

* Hopes for increased engagement post-pandemic

IV. Top Policy Priorities

1. Public Safety

* Student safety concerns near the University of Minnesota

* Police staffing shortages and overtime reliance

* Fire department taking over mental health response

* Criticism of current budget handling and public safety outsourcing

* Support for implementing DOJ consent decree reforms

2. Affordable Housing

* Support for local landlords and maintaining housing stock

* Need for better city enforcement and more housing inspectors

* Lead abatement program concerns

* Importance of housing diversity (starter rentals, move-up, senior living)

3. Economic Development

* Revitalizing small business ecosystem (e.g., coffee shops, grocery access)

* Encouraging tourism and local business growth

* Reducing regulatory burdens for small businesses and landlords

* Examples of code compliance challenges (e.g., toilet replacement)

V. Views on Current City Council Actions

* Support for:

* Renter ordinance requiring emergency contact info

* Civil rights ordinance additions (social impact, height/weight discrimination)

* Criticisms of:

* Budget process and lack of oversight

* Redundant spending and bypassing of city staff in funding allocations

* Duplication of services already provided by Hennepin County

* Overuse of consultants and lack of transparency

* George Floyd Square delays and disagreements

VI. Relationship with Mayor Frey

* Believes Frey deserves a third term

* Appreciates efforts to bring in qualified staff

* Open to collaboration and finding common ground

VII. Personal Interests and Closing

* Enjoys cooking shows, especially "Beat Bobby Flay"

* Making homemade ice cream

* Exploring parks with her dog, Tommy

* Belief in the importance of local, community-focused governance

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

Rep. Ilhan Omar, representing Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District, has injected herself into this year’s Minneapolis city council elections, endorsing eight candidates. All but one, Soren Stevenson (Ward 8), are incumbents. Robin Wonsley is not a DFL member; she identifies as a Democratic Socialist, a distinction highlighted on her campaign website.

An Ineffective and Divisive Record

On paper, Omar is one of Congress’s least effective members. According to GovTrack, none of the bills she introduced made it out of committee, and only 7% attracted bipartisan cosponsors. She ranks as the most politically left member of Minnesota’s congressional delegation.

Despite this record, the candidates she endorsed are eager to promote her backing. It signals where they stand. Minneapolis voters deserve to understand that an endorsement from Omar represents an alignment with ineffective governance and a controversial political ideology.

Her support base is also telling. In the 2023–2024 cycle, 93% of her donations came from outside Minnesota. Her donors are not primarily Minnesota residents—they are in New York, California, and Florida. The total raised by Rep. Ilhan Omar far exceeded the average congress person.

In her last race against Don Samuels, Omar raised over $8.2 million, with half coming from large individual donors. Despite branding herself as a champion of grassroots support, her major donors include executives and employees from Nvidia, HCA Healthcare, and Amazon. Samuels, by comparison, raised $1.6 million, facing a 5-to-1 spending gap. Big money flooded the zone, a strategy that feeds political cynicism and tilts elections before voters cast their ballots.

The Endorsements Are for Show—Not Substance

Too often, endorsements substitute for critical evaluation. Whether from the DFL, the DSA, SEIU, or celebrity politicians, endorsements reflect political alliances, not the best interests of Minneapolis residents.

We encourage voters to meet the candidates, ask questions, and evaluate them individually. Where do they stand on expanding bike lanes? How will they address public safety? Do they have realistic plans to hold taxes in check? What is their view on the proposed Labor Standards Board?

Local races can be decided by slim margins—Katie Cashman won her seat by just 177 votes. Your individual vote matters, especially in the general election.

The Bigger Risk: Losing the State

Minnesota risks following the path of Florida, a state that shifted from battleground to Republican stronghold in part because of political radicalization. This year alone, three high-profile Florida Democrats—including the State Senate’s former highest-ranking member—left the party. Or rather, they felt the party left them.

Candidates who align themselves with the Democratic Socialists of America and Rep. Ilhan Omar’s brand of politics may succeed in winning city council seats, but they risk alienating broader Minnesota voters. The consequences could be lasting. While politicians like Omar can fill a gym and energize a crowd of party faithful, the political energy they generate has not translated into meaningful legislative power. Their continued reliance on the same rhetoric and policies has damaged the Democratic Party’s broader reputation.

Moving Minneapolis Forward

Some may view this newsletter as a partisan attack on Rep. Omar, but that would be a mistake. We have long supported Democratic candidates and remain committed to strengthening the party. In Minneapolis, that means electing leaders who prioritize effective governance over controversy and division.

If you want change, it requires more than frustration around the campfire. It requires volunteering, donating, and engaging thoughtfully with the issues—not relying on endorsements.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

In this interview with Becka Thompson, we learned a lot about why she decided to run for the Ward 12 City Council seat, as well as the experience and skills she hopes to bring to the role. In addition to being elected as the District 2 Park Board Commissioner, Becka serves on the City Planning Commission alongside the Ward 12 incumbent, Aurin Chowdhury.

Becka’s background in math could be a valuable asset to the City Council, especially as it continues to disburse millions of dollars in loans and grants to nonprofits. For example, the Business, Housing, and Zoning Committee—of which Chowdhury is a member—recently approved a loan extension for the Cielo Sin Límites cooperative housing project. On April 17, the full Council approved the extension, and it is now awaiting Mayor Frey’s signature.

At the time of the interview, I wasn’t aware of this loan. Had I known, I would have asked Thompson how she would vote on such a measure. Is it in the city’s best interest to extend loans to cooperatives that have implemented rent control on properties purchased with the city’s help? If the finances were sound, one could argue that city involvement might not have been necessary in the first place.

This loan may be legitimate. However, it reminds me a bit of doing the sniff test on a carton of milk. Sometimes you take a whiff and you’re not quite sure—it could be sour, could be close, or it might be fine. Depending on how hungry you are, you might take your chances and pour it on your cereal.

How much the city should be spending on affordable housing projects—versus Hennepin County or the state—is an important question. We continue to hear that budgets and federal funds are likely to be reduced or eliminated under a Trump administration. If Minneapolis is required to trim its budget to make up for shortfalls, having someone with a background in math and systems thinking could be especially appealing to voters. We’ll need leaders who can prioritize and make smart, strategic adjustments.

Ward 12 residents can speak with Becka Thompson in person at her town hall:

Tuesday, April 29 @ 6:30 PM – Longfellow Recreation Center

A follow-up question residents could ask Thompson is whether she supports the idea of a municipal bank. I’ve heard other City Council members express support for the concept. If such a bank helped separate decisions about funding nonprofits and cooperatives from the City Council, the idea might have merit.

The DFL has yet to acknowledge that many residents have lost faith in them. In our current system, there is too much room for organizations receiving grants and no-interest loans to influence elected officials at all levels of government. The recent controversy involving DFL Senate Leader Joe Champion is another example of a politician seemingly oblivious to the broader damage their actions can cause. He is accused of providing legal services to nonprofits he directed funds to while serving in the legislature.

Attorney General Keith Ellison found himself at the center of unwanted attention last week when recordings surfaced of him in conversation with members of the Feeding Our Future fraud network.

While public safety is understandably a top concern for most residents, voters should also be asking tougher questions about how public money is being spent. Specifically: What kinds of groups should the City Council be funding, and why? When incumbents can point to grants or no-interest loans they’ve directed toward specific organizations, it gives them a built-in advantage—those same groups often respond with campaign donations and get-out-the-vote efforts. This cycle of mutual benefit can blur the line between public service and political favoritism.

Interview Outline: Becka Thompson (Ward 12 Candidate)

1. Introduction

* Interview opens with Becka introducing herself as a candidate for Ward 12.

* Expresses strong personal connection to the neighborhood; raised in Minneapolis.

* Background in education, acting, and public service.

2. Personal Background and Connection to Ward 12

* Grew up in Longfellow neighborhood.

* Lived in NYC and LA as an actor; returned in 2009 due to economic downturn.

* Challenges returning: affordability, neighborhood changes, housing situation.

* Currently lives in North Minneapolis; plans to move back to Ward 12 this summer.

3. Park Board Service and Achievements

* Currently serves on the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board.

* Chairs Administration & Finance Committee; also serves on Planning Commission and Audit Committee.

* Notable accomplishments:

* Secured ongoing funding for parkways and stormwater management.

* Addressed labor issues.

* Emphasizes collaborative, solutions-based governance.

4. City Council Candidacy and Motivation

* Motivation rooted in love for the neighborhood and frustration with city governance.

* Believes her transparency and structural thinking distinguish her from others.

5. Governance Style and Skills

* Background in math and systems thinking; has an MBA in finance.

* Advocates for structural, systems-level problem solving.

* Frustrated by emotionally driven, one-off decisions at City Hall.

6. Top Campaign Issues

* City Finances & Property Taxes

* Concerned about downtown vacancies and rising taxes.

* Emphasizes the need to attract businesses back and support residential conversion of commercial space.

* Public Safety

* Supports more officers and a structured approach to alternative public safety methods.

* Favors lateral police hiring and better support for existing officers.

* Small Business Recovery

* Advocates for assistance to businesses affected by unrest and the 2040 Plan.

* Proposes site-specific variances and direct outreach to landowners.

7. Planning Commission and Policy Insights

* Discusses power dynamics and lack of accountability within the Planning Commission.

* Cites experience pushing back on zoning decisions and recuperative care facility approvals.

* Raises concerns about state pressure on city-level decisions.

8. Stance on Current City Council Policies

* Opposes many recent policies, including:

* Uber/Lyft regulations

* Labor Standards Board

* 2024 budget (called it “the world of a thousand earmarks”)

* Fruit vendor ordinance (calls it well-intentioned but flawed)

* Believes the council lacks systems thinking and transparency.

9. Relationship with Mayor Jacob Frey

* Supports giving Frey a third term.

* Believes he’s shown integrity and deserves a council that can collaborate.

* Would work with him on budget and public safety.

10. Personal Life and Interests

* Loves Minneapolis’ lakes and parks; enjoys swimming, paddleboarding.

* Active family life; humorous anecdote about “Donna,” a giant floating couch.

* Describes herself as a person driven to empower others through systems change.

11. Closing Thoughts

* Campaign website: vote4becka.com

* Mentions dealing with impersonation and online attacks.

* Emphasizes commitment to honesty, transparency, and local support.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

Consistent Commitment

Minneapolis needs people who are committed to its revitalization. From picking up trash and removing graffiti to attracting new businesses and jobs, everything requires consistent, hard work.

I was excited to interview Adam Duininck for several reasons. First, as Uptown explores creating its own Business Improvement District, there are important lessons to learn from the years of experience that have shaped the Downtown Improvement District. Second, while I’ve heard about Adam and the Downtown Council for years, what exactly they do was often a mystery to me.

In our conversation, Adam makes the case for why someone like me—a newsletter writer working from home—should care about the fate of downtown. Any resident concerned about the city’s health and rising property taxes has a stake in seeing downtown rebound. While the share of tax revenue from commercial properties has shifted over time, they remain essential to the success of both Minneapolis and the state.

We talked about what Rochester is getting right, given its growth, and the challenges facing Minneapolis. We also discussed the possibility of a new arena for the Timberwolves, how crime is being addressed, and why it's vital for local leaders to actively support business investment here.

There is a Clock

The city needs solutions. Thirty-five people working every day to promote a city of this size seems modest. It’s easy—especially in an election year—to focus on the negatives. But Minneapolis must move forward. We need to build momentum for improving the city before we lose more businesses and residents to the suburbs and other states.

That doesn’t mean all hope is lost if we can’t bring new corporate headquarters and hundreds of employees back downtown every day. But it does mean we need creative, consistent effort to find new avenues for growth.

Our conversation didn’t reveal one simple solution. For example, converting commercial space to residential is a promising idea—but it won’t happen quickly, and it won’t work everywhere. It will take multiple, simultaneous efforts to first stabilize the city and then build on what we already have.

As we vet candidates, it’s worth asking: What actions will they take to welcome business? More is needed than a few small business grants or rent assistance for art installations. Minneapolis must change how it is perceived. It needs a mayor and city council willing to work together to compete in what’s shaping up to be an unpredictable and chaotic economic landscape.

More information about the Downtown Council is available on their website.

Better Minneapolis is reader-supported. Please consider becoming a paid member today.

Below is a summary outline of our conversation.

1. Overview of Organizations

* Roles of Minneapolis Downtown Council and Downtown Improvement District.

* Structure, staffing (approx. 35 employees), and funding sources (membership dues, event sponsorships, and some public funds).

2. Economic Impact & Downtown’s Significance

* Why downtown matters to the entire city and region.

* Commercial property tax implications for all residents.

* Historical tax share shift from commercial to residential.

3. Challenges Post-Pandemic

* Decline in office attendance and building values.

* Uneven downtown recovery compared to other cities.

* Vacant office buildings and tenant consolidation trends.

4. Public Safety & Perceptions

* Safety Ambassador program and Nicollet security pilot.

* Behavioral and outreach services (e.g., downtown storage program, community spaces).

* Perception gap vs. reality of safety downtown.

5. Events & Tourism

* Role in producing/promoting events (e.g., Aquatennial, Taste of Minnesota).

* Positive impact of sporting events (e.g., Timberwolves playoffs) on local economy.

6. Business & Development Policy

* Downtown Council as a pro-business advocate.

* Opposition to local-only policy moves (e.g., Uber/Lyft pay mandate, rent control).

* Emphasis on regional coordination.

7. Real Estate & Conversions

* Adaptive reuse of office buildings into residential (e.g., Northstar Center, Groove Lofts).

* Discussion of tax credits for redevelopment ("CUB" credit).

* Investment examples like the Kickernick Building.

8. Improvement District Model

* DID’s evolution and services (cleaning, safety, outreach).

* Advice for Uptown’s consideration of a similar model.

* Measurable impact through detailed data tracking.

9. Civic Engagement & Elections

* Importance of civic participation and election reforms.

* Duininck supports shifting municipal elections to even years.

* Skepticism of current caucus system.

10. Visitor Recommendations

* Favorite downtown spots: Mill City Museum, Nicollet Mall, Peavey Plaza, local restaurants.

* Encouragement to visit and even do staycations.

* Hope for revitalizing iconic spaces like the downtown post office.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

For today’s podcast, I interviewed two Uptown business owners: Chris Ikeda, owner and operator of the Lake & Irving restaurant, and Zach Pettus, owner and operator of CycleBar. We met at recent public meetings hosted by the Uptown Association—successful events attended by hundreds of local residents, business owners, and developers, all united by a common goal: to bring back Uptown.

Staying Power

There is new leadership and renewed resolve. People are restless. Residents and business owners want to see positive change in the area. Chris and Zach are part of a contingent determined to stay. They’re realistic about the challenges, but as small business owners, they know that obstacles come with the territory.

While much of the press has focused on businesses that have left, many remain—and they’re dedicating their time outside of work to building a community centered on revitalization. Some of the ideas being promoted include creating a Business Improvement District, similar to what exists Downtown; attracting new businesses to the area; and urging elected officials to actively support the neighborhood.

We cannot take our small businesses for granted, especially the newer ones like Moona Moono, Queermunity, and Mosaic Coffee. If people want to see Uptown succeed, they’ll need to show up—often—and support local businesses.

On September 20, the Uptown Association will host Open Streets on Hennepin Avenue between W. 26th and 36th Streets. And starting in June, a new Thursday night Farmers Market will launch. Events like these happen because volunteers step up and turn proposals into action.

Peter Remes of First & First recently purchased the former Apple Store and the Granada Theater—another sign of what's to come for Uptown.

The Risk Factor

Launching a small business is a risky endeavor. Owners often pool money from family and friends and invest their life savings with no guarantee of success. Your product must attract buyers. The timing must be right.

I respect that risk—partly because of my own experience growing up. My family ran an independent sales business and was always looking for new clients. We weathered many ups and downs, selling everything from telephone poles to wasp spray.

During tough times, things like home maintenance were deferred. Vacations were canceled or pushed to "next year." For years, we didn’t even have a home phone. As incredible as it sounds, every outing with friends had to be planned in person during the day, with the hope that nothing would change by evening. We accepted these sacrifices in order to meet payroll and keep the business running.

Green Shoots

As Zach points out in the podcast, some level of crime is expected in any metropolitan area—but as more people return to Uptown, that risk seems to be decreasing. Recent statistics show that crime is down. We’re no longer seeing intersections taken over by crowds racing cars and causing chaos.

None of us fully understand why these changes have happened. It’s not because more police have been hired, and there are no Safety Ambassadors. Still, we’re glad to see a new sense of security taking hold.

Parking along Hennepin Avenue between Lake and 31st is still a problem. Today, my editor gave up trying to take her 91-year-old mother to get eyeglasses because they couldn’t find parking close enough to the store. It’s a concern many people raised at the Uptown Association meetings—and one we hope will be addressed before more stores are forced to close.

Maybe I’m being overly optimistic because I can finally walk Zelda without gloves, a scarf, a hat, boots, and a parka—but there are signs of life in Uptown. The first green shoots are pushing up from the ground.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

Regardless of a candidate’s positions, we strive to assess their character. By this, we mean evaluating their ability to withstand pressure from lobbyists, irate residents, or even their own party members.

The ideal elected official—though no one is perfect—would be someone who carefully assesses the facts, listens to their constituents, and makes decisions that align with the values they’ve promised to uphold. This means making tough choices, even when they are unpopular or could cost them votes. Their role is to act in the city’s best interest—not just for today, but for the next five, ten, or fifteen years.

We aim to avoid candidates who simply tell voters what they want to hear to win an election. These individuals contribute to the widespread distrust of politicians. In fact, according to a 2024 Ipsos poll, only 15% of the population trusts politicians, placing them at the bottom of the list, tied with social media influencers.

As voters, we seek leaders with a broad, long-term perspective on public safety, economic development, and core city services. Better Minneapolis hopes that these podcast interviews help readers identify candidates capable of making the difficult, yet necessary, decisions for the future. Consider a paid subscription if you value this effort.

Demolition or Redevelopment?

For example, there are several ways to address the growing number of vacant office towers in downtown Minneapolis. One option is voluntary demolition. Evan Ramstad has discussed how this approach could reshape Detroit’s skyline, and a similar fate may await the Ameriprise Center in Minneapolis. Oddly enough, there is an incentive for building owners to demolish their properties, as reducing them to rubble can lower their tax burden. While advocates of adaptive reuse will likely oppose such demolitions, rebuilding from the ground up may make the most sense—both economically and for the city's future. How do you weigh the environmental impact against the long-term benefits of a new building that will serve the community for years to come?

Another approach, highlighted by Brianna Kelly for Downtown Voices, is financial incentives for redevelopment:

Two downtown Minneapolis firms are advocating for a statewide tax credit to encourage the transformation of underutilized buildings into new, in-demand spaces. Sherman Associates and Hempel Real Estate are part of a coalition lobbying at the Capitol for the Catalyzing Underused Buildings (CUB) credit, a six-year program designed to make costly conversion projects more financially viable for developers.

Is demolition or redevelopment more aligned with the DFL or the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)? It’s hard to say. These groups rarely take clear stances on such topics. What is clear, however, is that both options would reduce tax revenue—at least in the short term.

Determining the best path forward is one of the many difficult decisions we expect our elected officials to make. That’s why it’s crucial to listen carefully to candidates, ask tough questions, and take a leap of faith—hoping that this time, we choose a leader who can deliver real solutions for Minneapolis’ most pressing challenges.

Summary of Lydia Millard Interview

Lydia Millard is running for Minneapolis City Council in Ward 10. She brings a deep connection to the community and a passion for revitalizing Uptown. A Minneapolis native, she grew up in North Minneapolis and has lived in Uptown for the past five years. Currently, she serves as the Executive Director of the Stevens Square Community Organization and manages logistics and strategic planning in Target's store operations.

Millard identifies public safety, small business support, and constituent services as Ward 10’s top priorities. She argues that crime, encampments, and drug-related issues have significantly altered Uptown’s atmosphere, making people hesitant to visit or invest in the area. She emphasizes the need to rebuild trust in law enforcement while also promoting alternative safety measures.

She is also deeply concerned about the loss of small businesses, with over 50 closures in the past five years. She advocates for stronger city support, including financial assistance during construction projects and policies that attract diverse, locally-owned businesses.

Millard criticizes the current city council for poor constituent communication and lack of professionalism, stressing the need for better collaboration and responsiveness. Her vision for Uptown is to restore its vibrancy, safety, and economic strength while fostering community engagement and civic pride.

Community Note

To hear about progress toward comprehensive safety in the Uptown neighborhood please attend “Uptown Safety Ambassadors. What is happening and when?” at the Uptown Theater on March 24th.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

Adding up the Independent Votes

If you’re looking for a shift in the direction of the City Council, electing Dan Orban in Ward 9 might be part of the equation. Unlike most other candidates for City Council, Dan is running as an Independent and will not be seeking the DFL endorsement.

According to the city’s website, “Ward 9 is one of the most densely populated wards as well as one of the most diverse. It includes the largest urban American Indian population, the largest Latino population, a strong East African community, and a progressive LGBTQ community.”

The incumbent, Jason Chavez, has been a strong advocate for further study of George Floyd Square, including the possibility of converting it into a pedestrian mall. For Orban to overcome Chavez’s incumbent advantage, he will need to build strong connections within this diverse community while addressing a range of complex and often controversial issues.

There are currently an estimated seven encampments in Ward 9—the highest number in the city. The ward frequently makes headlines due to violence, including the September 2024 shootings near encampments that left two people dead.

Ward 9 is also the proposed site of the East Phillips Urban Farm, a project that has faced repeated delays as the East Phillips Neighborhood Institute (EPNI) struggles to secure funding. Incumbent council member Jason Chavez has played a key role in keeping the project alive, granting multiple extensions to allow additional fundraising. In the meantime, the vacant property costs taxpayers $100,000 per month to maintain.

Dan emphasizes several times in the interview that he holds no personal animosity toward Chavez. His approach is one we’d like to see more often—where candidates can disagree without viewing each other as enemies. Progress doesn’t have to come at the expense of destroying one’s opponent. While it’s not always easy, it is possible to disagree while remaining respectful. Being heard often starts with listening.

Interview Summary

Dan is a lecturer in computer science at the University of Minnesota. In the interview, he shares that his candidacy stems from firsthand frustrations with public safety, including crime near his home that affected his family's quality of life. Orban previously ran in 2023, inspired by the lack of response from city officials to pressing neighborhood concerns.

Public safety is his top priority, citing ongoing crime, drug-related issues, and the presence of encampments. While he supports compassionate approaches, he is skeptical about the effectiveness of sanctioned outdoor spaces for encampments, arguing for more structured housing and treatment solutions. He also emphasizes the need for economic revitalization, stating that local businesses feel unsupported and that crime discourages investment.

Dan advocates for maintaining core city services, such as police funding, road maintenance, and emergency services. He supports hiring more police while also expanding behavioral crisis response teams. Running as an independent, he believes in bridging political divides and focusing on practical solutions rather than ideological battles. His campaign message centers on collaboration, common-sense governance, and restoring trust between the city and its residents.

You can learn more about Dan Orban at his website https://danorban.github.io/

Community Note

To hear about progress toward comprehensive safety in the Uptown neighborhood please attend “Uptown Safety Ambassadors. What is happening and when?” at the Uptown Theater on March 24th.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe