Artificial Intelligence is no longer a futuristic fantasy—it’s here, shaping industries, influencing decisions, and redefining what it means to be human. But as AI tools become more powerful, ethical concerns are emerging at an alarming rate. Can AI truly be ethical, or does it simply reflect the biases of its creators? Who should be held accountable when AI makes decisions that impact society? And as automation expands, will AI take over jobs, or will it force us to redefine the workforce?

In this episode of Beyond the First, I sit down with two students from my Media Law and Ethics class, to tackle the complex ethical dilemmas surrounding AI. After all, they will be the ones grappling with this issue in the coming years. We explore AI’s impact on job markets, particularly in communication design, where AI tools are both enhancing productivity and increasing competition. We also examine AI-generated biases, its influence on decision-making, and the ongoing debate over AI’s role in creative and professional fields.

The conversation highlights the urgent need for ethical guidelines in AI development. Should AI ethics be standardized across industries, or should regulations be sector-specific? We dive into real-world examples, from AI-driven hiring algorithms that reinforce discrimination to AI-generated journalism that blurs the line between fact and fiction. With governments and corporations struggling to regulate AI, the question remains: Can we ensure AI serves humanity without causing unintended harm?

Should AI be treated as a tool, a collaborator, or something more? And as AI’s influence grows, how can we prevent it from deepening societal inequalities?

Join us for a thought-provoking discussion on bias, accountability, and the battle over AI’s moral code.

Listen, Subscribe, and Join the Conversation.

The internet has redefined communication, but it has also reshaped the way reputations are built—and destroyed. In today’s digital world, a single tweet, viral video, or misleading headline can cause irreparable harm. How do defamation laws apply in an era where falsehoods can spread faster than the truth? Has technology made it harder to differentiate between free speech and reputational harm? And should legal protections evolve to address these new realities?

In this episode of Beyond the First, I sit down with two students from my Media Law and Ethics class, to explore how modern defamation cases are being shaped by digital platforms, social media, and emerging AI-generated content. We discuss how online accusations, viral misinformation, and the lack of editorial oversight on social media create a new frontier for defamation law.

The consequences of viral misinformation extend beyond legal disputes. According to a study from 2022 by The Digital Wellness Lab’s Pulse Survey, "Adolescent Media Use: Attitudes, Effects, and Online Experiences," there is a growing body of evidence linking excessive social media use to a mental health crisis among young people. Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression, and as of summer 2023, the average daily use in this age group had reached 4.8 hours, according to Gallup. Additionally, nearly half of teenagers report that social media negatively affects their body image. With reputations and mental well-being on the line, how should society balance the benefits of digital platforms with the risks of misinformation and reputational harm?

Unlike traditional defamation cases involving newspapers or television, digital defamation often occurs without professional editorial control, making it harder to track, regulate, or correct false information. How should legal frameworks adapt to this new reality? Is the legal system equipped to provide justice to those harmed online, or is reputation damage in the digital space just an unavoidable risk?

Building on the themes of celebrity lawsuits, media influence, and reputation management, this episode expands the discussion into how ordinary people can find themselves caught in the crossfire of cancel culture, digital rumors, and viral defamation.

Join us as we examine the evolving legal and ethical landscape of free speech, accountability, and reputation in the digital age.

Listen, Subscribe, and Join the Conversation.

In Hollywood, lawsuits often unfold like carefully scripted dramas, with every legal filing, public statement, and media leak contributing to a narrative that plays out in front of millions. The ongoing defamation dispute between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni over the It Ends With Us film is no exception. While the case raises serious legal questions, it also highlights how public figures strategically use the law, media, and public relations to control the storyline.

In this episode of Beyond the First, I sit down with two students from my Media Law and Ethics class, to analyze how defamation law applies in the entertainment industry, and whether celebrities today are more concerned with protecting their reputations or shaping public perception. How does the law differentiate between fair criticism and harmful falsehoods? When do media narratives cross the line from reporting to reputation destruction? And does the legal system even stand a chance in the face of viral social media storms

We examine the Blake Lively v. Justin Baldoni lawsuit, break down past high-profile defamation cases, and discuss what these legal battles mean for Hollywood, journalism, and everyday social media users. With celebrity feuds increasingly being fought as much in courtrooms as they are on Twitter and Instagram, this episode takes a closer look at the intersection of free speech, defamation law, and the power of media narratives.

Is this case about legal redress, or is it a PR war disguised as a lawsuit? Join us for a discussion that unpacks the legal, ethical, and media complexities of high-profile defamation cases.

Read, Subscribe, and Join the Conversation.

From banned books to campus speech restrictions, debates over the limits of free expression continue to shape American society. As government officials push for more control over classroom content and public institutions wrestle with how to regulate controversial speech, the boundaries of the First Amendment are being tested in new and complex ways.

In this episode of Beyond the First, I sit down with two Elon University students from my Media Law and Ethics class, to explore the legal and ethical implications of these free speech controversies. What happens when governments restrict what can be taught in schools? Do campus speech policies protect marginalized voices, or do they stifle open debate? And how do these policies align with the First Amendment’s core protections?

We break down the latest legal battles over book bans, examine how public universities handle controversial speakers, and discuss whether government oversight of speech is ever justified. With free speech rights facing increasing challenges, this episode provides a critical look at the tension between protecting expression and maintaining societal order.

Join us for an engaging conversation that unpacks these urgent First Amendment debates and what they mean for the future of free expression in America.

Read, Subscribe, and Join the Conversation.

The U.S. government has long debated the potential ban of TikTok, citing national security risks. But how much of this is about genuine concerns over data privacy, and how much is political theater? In the second episode of Beyond the First, we examine whether the push to regulate TikTok is rooted in national security concerns or if it’s simply a convenient way for lawmakers to exert control over digital platforms.

Joining me for this discussion are two Elon University students from my Media Law and Ethics class, who have been exploring the constitutional implications of banning TikTok, the broader debate over government regulation of social media, and whether such measures could set a dangerous precedent for free speech.

We break down the key arguments from lawmakers, examine what the U.S. Supreme Court held in TikTok v. Garland, and other recent legal challenges facing past attempts to regulate social media platforms, and question whether TikTok is truly a national security threat or just the latest political scapegoat.

As digital platforms continue to shape public discourse, this episode takes a deep dive into how government intervention can reshape the online landscape, what it means for free expression in the digital age, and whether TikTok is a legitimate concern or a convenient distraction.

Tune in for an engaging and thought-provoking discussion that challenges the dominant narratives surrounding tech regulation, national security, and digital free speech.

Read, Subscribe, and Join the Conversation.

Artificial intelligence is no longer a futuristic concept—it’s here, shaping industries and redefining creativity. As AI-generated content floods the internet, legal battles over copyright and ethical dilemmas around artistic integrity are intensifying. Can an AI truly create? Who owns the work it generates? And is the rapid rise of AI in creative industries a revolution or an existential threat to human artists?

In the inaugural episode of Beyond the First, I sit down with two insightful Elon University students from my Media Law and Ethics Winter Term class, to break down the legal and ethical issues surrounding AI and copyright. We explore the growing concerns of artists, the challenges facing lawmakers, and whether the legal system can keep pace with technological advancements.

From high-profile lawsuits to debates over fair use, our discussion delves into the murky waters of AI-generated content. Should AI art be eligible for copyright protection? Or does it undermine human creativity by repurposing existing works?

Trey and Carina bring fresh perspectives to this pressing issue, discussing recent cases, policy proposals, and the broader implications for journalism, film, and entertainment. Whether you're an artist, a legal scholar, or simply someone fascinated by the intersection of technology and law, this episode offers an engaging and thought-provoking conversation.

Listen to Beyond the First for an in-depth look at AI, copyright, and the evolving future of creative industries.

Read, Subscribe, and Join the Conversation.