In this episode of Bias Breakdown, we explore the contentious case of Kilmar Abrego-Garcia, whose deportation to El Salvador and alleged MS-13 gang ties have sparked a national debate. Media outlets across the political spectrum have framed his story in starkly contrasting ways: left-leaning sources emphasize his role as a father from Maryland who deserves a chance to return to the U.S. for due process, while conservative outlets focus on his alleged gang affiliations and undocumented status to justify his deportation. As the legal questions surrounding his removal and potential return remain unresolved, the case could ultimately return to the Supreme Court for further clarification. In episode 18 of Bias Breakdown, we analyze how these dramatically different portrayals are shaping public perception.

Is Medicaid being gutted — or not touched at all? With Republicans pushing forward a sweeping federal budget plan backed by President Trump, one question is front and center: Is Medicaid on the chopping block?

In episode 16 of Bias Breakdown, we explore the divided media coverage following President Trump’s tariff announcement. While right-leaning networks predict a market recovery and economic boom, left-leaning media warn of a looming recession. We break down the media’s spin on market volatility, the differing economic outlooks, and how political biases in news coverage can shape public perception over major economic events.

As Judge Brad Schimel and Judge Susan Crawford battled for the bench in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election, left-leaning and right-leaning outlets framed the race through drastically different lenses, turning a state judicial contest into a national political flashpoint.

In episode 15 of Bias Breakdown, we explore how left-leaning outlets honed in on Elon Musk’s financial backing of Judge Schimel, painting it as a billionaire’s attempt to buy the court. Meanwhile, right-leaning media spotlighted Democratic donors’ focus on flipping congressional seats, portraying Judge Crawford’s campaign as a partisan power grab.

Media narratives largely mirrored the interests of their aligned candidates, often omitting ethical concerns raised by the opposition. We break down the stark contrasts in coverage, revealing how each side shaped the election.

How did the same set of deportation flights produce such drastically different headlines? In this episode, we break down the legal battle over the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act—and the media’s role in shaping the narrative surrounding a judge’s ruling to halt the deportations. Left-leaning outlets have framed the flights as a violation of judicial authority, while right-leaning sources argue that the administration acted within its rights and complied with the court order.

President Donald Trump has questioned former President Joe Biden’s use of an autopen to sign official documents and pardons. The Heritage Foundation sparked the debate, claiming Biden’s signatures on multiple documents appear identical, raising doubts about their authenticity. In episode 13 of Bias Breakdown, we'll analyze the media narratives, with right-leaning outlets focusing on concerns over Biden’s mental acuity and possible abuse of power, while left-leaning outlets downplay the issue, emphasizing that autopen use is legally sound and historically precedented.

In this week’s episode of Bias Breakdown, we explore the conflicting media narratives surrounding the alleged feud between Elon Musk and Secretary of State Marco Rubio during a closed-door cabinet meeting, as reported by The New York Times. Left-leaning outlets highlight the report’s allegations as chaos and dysfunction within the Trump Administration, while right-leaning outlets dismissed the report as part of a larger attempt by the left to discredit DOGE’s efforts to cut government waste.

In this week’s episode of Bias Breakdown, we dive into the media's contrasting portrayals of the tense Oval Office meeting between President Trump, Vice President Vance, and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy. Left-leaning outlets framed Trump’s comments as an attack on Zelenskyy, while right-leaning media focused on Zelenskyy’s stance and perceived lack of gratitude. We analyze how biased word choices in headlines and fact-checking discrepancies shape public perception, influencing how the meeting is understood across political lines.

In episode 11 of Bias Breakdown, we expose the media's role in spinning the narrative and help viewers separate the facts from the bias.

Recent polls on President Donald Trump’s favorability have sparked conflicting reports from left- and right-leaning media. Are Trump’s approval numbers historically low, or is he more favorable than ever? Are his actions in his first 30 days popular or unpopular? The answer depends on which news source you follow.

In episode 10 of Bias Breakdown, we analyze the conflicting narratives in headlines and network coverage of recent polling. We examine how left- and right-leaning outlets shape public perception by framing the data through their preferred political lens.

CBS News has come under fire from conservative media for comments made by Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan, who referenced how free speech was exploited in Nazi Germany to carry out the Holocaust. The backlash also centers on a 60 Minutes report highlighting police raids in Germany targeting individuals who violated their speech laws. Media responses to the controversy have varied significantly, with right-leaning outlets amplifying the criticism while left-leaning outlets largely ignore the story.