Biblical Genetics

Biblical Genetics

Download on the App Store

Biblical Genetics episodes

  • Early Israel was a Hotbed of Interracial Dating

    The biblical story details a surprising number of marriages between Israelite and non-Israelite people. This leads to questions about what is a “Jew”, where the boundaries are between “races” (if they even exist), and what we should expect to see when we look at the DNA of Jewish and other Middle Eastern people. According to the Bible, the Jews should be a mélange of all the people among whom they lived. Is it true?

    Min article: Carter R (2017) Extensive mixing among Israelites and non-Israelites in biblical history, Journal of Creation 31(3):112-118.

    Thumbnail credit: Victoria Roman via unsplash.com

    Would you like to help support Biblical Genetics? It is easy!

    • One time: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/BibGenetics
    • Monthly: https://www.Patreon.com/BiblicalGenetics
    • 12 min
    • How long were the Israelites in Egypt?

      There are many question that revolve around the Israelites time in Egypt. One of these deals with how long they were there. The Bible gives conflicting numbers and people argue over a “430-year Long Sojourn” and a “215-year Short Sojourn”. In this episode, Dr Carter attempts to add to the discussion by introducing the genealogical data given to us in the Bible. The data beautifully and easily span a 215-year window, but cannot span a 430-year.

      Notes and links:

      • Main article: Carter R, Sanders S, How long were the Israelites in Egypt? Using their own family tree to resolve a debate, Creation.com, 14 September 2021.
        • You can download the original graphics in .jpg format from that link.
        • Masoretic vs Septuagint debate:
          • Cosner L, Carter R, Textual traditions and biblical chronology, Journal of Creation, 29(2):99–105, 2015.
          • Cosner L, Carter R, Is the Septuagint a superior text for the Genesis genealogies? Creation.com, 25 September 2018.
          • Cosner L, Carter R, The Masoretic text of Genesis 5 and 11 is still the most reliable, Creation.com, 4 June 2019
          • Cosner L, Carter R, Iron sharpening iron: the MT-LXX debate as a case study of Christian disagreement, Creation.com, 3 August 2019.
          • Cosner L, Carter R, Bad arguments for the Masoretic Text, Creation.com, 11 February 2020
          • Sarfati J, Biblical chronogenealogies, Creation.com.
          • Bates G, Egyptian chronology and the Bible—framing the issues, Creation.com, 2 September 2014.
          • The “4,004 BC” date of Archbishop James Ussher, See Sarfati J, Archbishop’s achievement: James Ussher’s great work Annals of the World is now available in English, Creation 26(1):24–27, 2003.
          • Thumbnail: Color Crescent via Unsplash.com

            24 min
          • The Jews, inbreeding, and false notions of ‘race’

            The origin of the Jewish nation is a fascinating question that is addressed in the Bible, archaeology, and genetics. In this episode, Dr Rob examines the early Israelite family tree and notes the huge amount of inbreeding that occurred as three successive generations intermarried. He compares this to other people from across the world and draws some conclusions about the rise of the various human ‘races’ that will be surprising to many.

            Notes and links:

            • Carter R. 2013. Inbreeding and the origin of races, Journal of Creation 27(3):8–10. [Original paper, with main graphics]
            • Carter R, Sanders L, How long were the Israelites in Egypt? Using their own family tree to resolve a debate, Creation.com, 21 September 2021.
            • Carter R. 2018. The genetic history of the Israelite nation, Journal of Creation 32(1):114–120.
            • Carter R, Sanders L, The Israelites: Forging of a nation, Creation.com, 2 September 2021.
            • Carter R, Where did the Israelites cross the “Red Sea”? Creation.com, 20 July 2021.
            • Carter R. 2017. Extensive mixing among Israelites and non-Israelites in biblical history, Journal of Creation 31(3):112–118.
            • Ringbauer H, et al. 2021. Parental relatedness through time revealed by runs of homozygosity in ancient DNA, Nature Communications 12:5425; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25289-w.
            • Thumbnail image: Blake Campbell via Unspash.com

              17 min
            • The Barrier has been breached: new discoveries are challenging neo-Darwinism

              Dr Rob reveals several new studies that are challenging the fundamental assumptions that underlie the neo-Darwinian synthesis. Specifically. the ‘central dogma of molecular biology’ (the thought that information only flows from DNA to RNA to protein) and the Weismann barrier (the thought that only the DNA ‘information’ in sperm and egg cells is inherited) are both wrong. Recent revelations have shown us that sperm actively absorb and use body-cell-sourced RNA in the epididymis, and one polymerase uses RNA templates in a newly discovered DNA repair system. Neither of these are supposed to be true. Can a vague idea from the 19th century withstand the assault of 21st century knowledge? Hardly. The simplifying assumptions made by Darwin and his contemporaries no longer hold up.

              Notes and links:

              • Main article: Carter R., The barrier has been breached! Making a fool out of Professor Wise-man, Creation.com, 7 September 2021.
              • Wilhelm D, Palmer S, Koopman P, Sex determination and gonadal development in mammals, Physiol. Rev. 87(1):1–28, 2007; doi: 10.1152/physrev.00009.2006.
              • Crow JF, Age and sex differences on human mutation rates: an old problem with new complexities, J. Radiat. Res. 47(Suppl.):B75–B82, 2006; doi: 10.1269/jrr.47.b75.
              • James ER, et al., The role of the epididymis and the contribution of epididymosomes to mammalian reproduction, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:5377, 2020; doi: 10.3390/ijms21155377.
              • Chandramouly G, et al., Polθ reverse transcribes RNA and promotes RNA-templated DNA repair. Science Advances 7(24):eabf1771; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1771. See also the press release from Thomas Jefferson University “New discovery shows human cells can write RNA sequences into DNA”, Phys.org, 11 June 2021.
              • King TE, et al., Africans in Yorkshire? The deepest-rooting clade of the Y phylogeny within an English genealogy, Eur J. Hum. Genet. 15:288–293, 2007; doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201771.
              • Filming locations: Kennesaw National Battlefield Park and Kennesaw Memorial Park.

                14 min
              • Is Covid-19 Evolving? No, but it sure is mutating fast!

                People are constantly asking me, “Is Covid-19 evolving?” So I went ahead and recorded my answer. In short, no, there is nothing to suggest that it is on its way to becoming anything but a coronavirus. In fact, it should be picking up enough mutations over time that it slowly degrades. In other words, it is on its way to becoming a decrepit coronavirus, given a decade or two. But this does not mean that it won’t find that lucky mutation that makes it spread faster or that makes is more deadly in the meantime.

                Links:

                • Loess Hills, Iowa
                • Preparation Canyon State Park
                • Darwin’s finches: see Lightner J, Finch beaks point to a Creator who provides, Journal of Creation 26(2):8–10, 2012.
                • Tay J, Reclaiming the peppered moth: designed to adapt, Creation 42(3):18–21, 2020.
                • Eacock A, et al., Adaptive colour change and background choice behaviour in peppered moth caterpillars is mediated by extraocular photoreception, Communications Biology 2:286, 2019.
                • Carter RW, More evidence for the reality of genetic entropy, Journal of Creation 28(1):16–17, 2014. [Deals with the extinction of the human H1N1 influenza]
                • Carter RW, Sanford JC, A new look at an old virus: patterns of mutation accumulation in the human H1N1 influenza virus since 1918, Theor Biol Med Model 9:42, 2012.
                • Carter R, Is Covid-19 Evolving? No, but it is changing rapidly, Creation.com, 24 Aug 2021. [also a discussion on APOBEC enzymes]
                • Carter R, RNA vaccines: harnessing God’s design to help prevent sickness, but will the new vaccine technology alter our DNA?, Creation.com, 3 Dec 2020.
                • Sarfati J, CMI, vaccines, and vaccination, Creation.com, 24 Aug 2021 update.
                • Coronavirus videos on Creation.com
                • Main thumbnail image: Daniel Schludi via Unsplash.com

                  16 min
                • The Amazing Braided Baramin Concept is Intrinsic to Creation

                  Dr Rob wraps up his 4-part series Species Were Designed to change by introducing a fascinating, profound, game-changing idea: the ‘Braided Baramin Concept’. Species are not the ‘created unit’. Baramins are. Species are ephemeral. Baramins are fixed, in that they are a group of organisms designed to reproduce within themselves and not with any member of another baramin. Species, on the other hand, can form, go extinct, remain constant, or merge with other species. Thus, all the data Darwin used for his theory are actually part of Creation.

                  Notes and links:

                  • Species were designed to change, part 1: How much change is allowed?
                  • Species were designed to change, part 2: Speciation and the limits of change
                  • Species were designed to change, part 3: The tangled web of (intrabaraminic) life
                  • Corals of the World on Amazon
                  • Corals in Space and Time on Amazon
                  • Dog colour patterns explained by modular promoters of ancient canid origin
                  • How to think (not what to think)
                  • 20 min
                  • Classifying the Created Kinds Leads to Fascinating Results

                    This is the third installment in my Species Were Designed to Change series. Here, I take the concept of a baramin (a “created kind”) and unpack it so that we can broaden our understanding of the range of possibilities inherent in this concept. God could have created a sexually reproducing baramin with only two individuals (like humans), or baramins with high or low diversity or with many or few individuals. He could have created a single baramin with a wide distribution or one that was broken up into discrete and isolated pockets. In the latter case, when members of those pockets did eventually manage to meet, a burst of speciation due to new gene combinations could have commenced. The possibilities are almost endless, which goes a long way to explain some pretty profound mysteries in paleontology.

                    Links:

                    • Species Were Designed to Change, part 1, video and podcast on BiblicalGenetics.com, original article on Creation.com
                    • Species Were Designed to Change, part 2, video and podcast on BiblicalGenetics.com, original article on Creation.com
                    • Species Were Designed to Change, part 3, original article on Creation.com
                    • Modern Humans from Adam and Eve? You Bet! Video and podcast on BiblicalGenetics.com
                    •  

                      18 min
                    • Speciation and the Limits of Change

                      Location: Orphan Brigade Battlefield Park, Dallas, GA

                      Notes and links:

                      • Species were designed to change, part 1: But how much change is allowed?
                      • Species were designed to change, part 2: Speciation and the limits of change
                      • Terborg P. 2008. Evidence for the design of life: part 2—Baranomes. J Creation 22(3):68–76.
                      • African rift lakes on Wikipedia
                      • Cichlids on Wikipedia
                      • 23 min
                      • God Deliberately Engineered Life to Change, but How Much Change is Allowed?

                        Dr Rob puts the smackdown on a tired old meme: the claim that the Bible teaches that God created all species just they appear today. In so doing, he outlines four important mechanisms that allow for ‘change over time’ within the creation model. This is the first part in a series of videos on the topic. They parallel a series of articles he wrote for Creaton.com. See: Species were designed to change, part 1

                        Other links:

                        • Fetal Tissue Research Part 1: Human cloning
                        • Jacob’s Livestock Breeding Experiment
                        • Terborg, P. Evidence for the design of life: part 2—Baranomes, Journal of Creation 22(3):68–76, 2008.
                        • Filming Location: Raven Cliff Falls Trail, near Helen, GA

                           

                          15 min
                        • The Waiting Time Problem

                          Location: Champ’s Clock Shop, Douglasville, GA

                          Dr Rob describes a contentious idea: the Waiting Time Problem. Mathematical simulations tells us that the rise of specific new mutations would take a fantastically long time. This is a serious challenge to evolution. Yet, most people misunderstand the problem. We are not talking about the time it takes for a new mutation to appear but the time it takes a new mutation to appear multiple times (because most new mutations are lost to genetic drift) plus the time it takes the lucky surviving mutation to spread through the entire population and completely replace the original variant. The numbers are shocking. Even the simplest 1-letter change would take longer than evolution allows, but 2-letter and longer combinations are orders of magnitude worse.

                          Notes and links:

                          • Sanford et al. 2015. The waiting time problem in a model hominin population. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 12:18.
                          • Carter R 2019. A successful decade for Mendel’s Accountant. Journal of Creation 33(2):51–56.
                          • The Antikythera Mechanism
                          • Harrison’ clocks and the Longitude problem
                          • Rupe and Sanford. 2013. Using numerical simulation to better understand fixation rates, and establishment of a new principle: Haldane’s Ratchet. Proceedings of the
                          • 7th International Conference on Creationism, Article 32.
                          • Batten D. 2005. Haldane’s Dilemma has not been solved. Journal of Creation 19(1):20–21.
                          • ReMine W. 2010. Cost theory and the cost of substitution—a clarification. Journal of Creation 19(1):113–125.
                          • 23 min

                          About Biblical Genetics

                          From the publisher's feed

                          Biblical Genetics is a vlog/podcast by Dr. Robert Carter. His posts explore modern genetics through the lens of biblical history, and vice versa.