Discovery Health has reversed its stance and will absorb the cost of a claims processing error after public backlash from affected medical scheme members.

Donut Lab has announced what it describes as the world’s first production-deployed all-solid-state battery, marking a potential inflection point for electric mobility. Unlike solid-state technologies that remain confined to laboratories or pilot programs, Donut Lab claims its system is already shipping in consumer vehicles.

Unveiled at CES 2026, the battery is being delivered as part of Verge Motorcycles’ 2026 lineup, positioning the technology not as a future promise, but as a commercial reality. If performance claims hold under real-world conditions, the announcement challenges long-held assumptions about EV charging speed, durability, and safety.

Production-Ready Solid-State Technology

Solid-state batteries have long been viewed as the successor to lithium-ion cells, offering higher energy density and improved safety. However, mass adoption has been constrained by manufacturing complexity, material costs, and scalability challenges.

Donut Lab CEO Marko Lehtimäki says those barriers have now been crossed. According to the company, its solid-state battery is available today, with Verge TS Pro and TS Ultra motorcycles scheduled to reach customers in Q1 2026.

Donut Lab claims the new system enables:

Charging times measured in minutes rather than hours

Long-range capability without increased battery mass

Elimination of several degradation mechanisms associated with lithium-ion cells

If validated at scale, this would place Donut Lab years ahead of competitors still targeting late-decade deployment.

Technical Specifications and Performance

At the core of Donut Lab’s announcement is an energy density claim of 400 Wh/kg, a figure that exceeds most current lithium-ion packs used in production vehicles. Higher density allows manufacturers to either extend range or reduce vehicle weight, both critical factors in EV design.

The company reports:

0–100% charging in as little as five minutes

Up to 600 km of range in motorcycle applications

A projected lifespan of up to 100,000 charge cycles

While these figures remain to be independently verified, the claimed cycle life directly addresses a persistent concern in EV ownership: battery degradation and its impact on long-term value.

Safety and Temperature Resilience

Battery safety continues to shape consumer trust and regulatory scrutiny. Donut Lab’s design removes flammable liquid electrolytes entirely, eliminating a key trigger for thermal runaway events.

According to internal test data:

The battery retains over 99% capacity at temperatures as low as −30°C

It remains structurally stable beyond 100°C without ignition or failure

If corroborated through third-party testing, these characteristics could significantly reduce fire risk while expanding EV viability in extreme climates.

Strategic Partnerships and Ecosystem Integration

Rather than positioning the battery as a standalone component, Donut Lab is building what it describes as a modular electrification platform. The ecosystem combines the Donut Battery with in-wheel motors, control electronics, and proprietary software under a unified architecture.

Current deployments and partnerships include:

WattEVDeveloping modular skateboard platforms integrating Donut motors and batteries across multiple vehicle classes.

Ahola Group (via Cova Power)Producing electrified smart trailers that reportedly reduce diesel consumption by 54% and overall energy use by 30% in heavy-haul operations.

ESOX GroupDeploying the technology in defense and tactical platforms, where durability, temperature tolerance, and reliability are mission-critical.

This diversified approach suggests Donut Lab is targeting industrial, logistics, and defense sectors alongside consumer mobility.

Global Context and Supply Chain Security

EV adoption is increasingly shaped by supply-chain resilience and geopolitical risk. Donut Lab states its battery chemistry relies on abundant, non-geopolitically sensitive materials, enabling localized production in Europe and North America.

The company argues this approach could:

Reduce exposure to critical mineral volatility

Enable regional manufacturing independence

Lower total production costs below lithium-ion equivalents

If accurate, these claims position the technology not only as a performance upgrade, but as a strategic alternative amid tightening global supply constraints.

Implications Beyond Transportation

The reported cycle life and safety profile open potential applications beyond mobility. Grid-scale energy storage, data centers, and industrial backup systems all suffer from high battery replacement costs over time.

A solid-state system capable of surviving tens of thousands of cycles could materially alter the economics of stationary energy storage, particularly in regions accelerating renewable energy deployment.

Impact and What Comes Next

The arrival of a production-ready solid-state battery compresses a timeline many analysts previously placed closer to 2030. While large-scale validation remains critical, Donut Lab’s announcement raises immediate pressure on legacy automakers and battery manufacturers to accelerate their own programs.

For now, Donut Lab’s focus is on execution. Verge Motorcycles deliveries begin in Q1 2026, with broader OEM adoption expected to follow. If real-world performance aligns with published metrics, the company may have shifted the EV conversation from when solid-state arrives to who adapts fast enough.

Canva launches its South African office in Johannesburg, supporting creators, SMEs, and students through local payments and education initiatives.

DappRadar, one of the most widely used Web3 analytics platforms, has shut down after seven years, citing a financially unsustainable market environment. The closure affects over 1 million monthly users, developers, journalists, and researchers who relied on the platform’s cross-chain data.

The company confirmed that blockchain indexing and related services will be discontinued in the coming days.

Why the DappRadar Shutdown Was Announced

Founders Skirmantas Januškas and Dragos said DappRadar was created in 2018 when decentralized applications were just emerging. Inspired by the popularity of early projects such as CryptoKitties, they built the platform to help users interpret blockchain activity across multiple networks.

The team said it had survived both bull and bear markets, but the current conditions made long-term operation impossible.

Founders Attribute Closure to Rising Infrastructure Costs

The founders noted that real-time tracking for nearly 100 blockchains required increasing storage, compute, and engineering investment. The cost of maintaining a global analytics operation became incompatible with current market activity and available revenue channels.

How the Shutdown Affects the Web3 Analytics Ecosystem

DappRadar became a widely cited data source in Web3, supporting developers, investors, research institutions, and media outlets with insights into decentralized applications, NFTs, and protocol-level activity.

The platform’s final metrics included:

Key Indicators From DappRadar’s Operational History

1M monthly users

18,113 decentralized applications tracked

93 blockchains indexed

35 employees

Backing from Prosus, Blockchain Ventures, and NordicNinja VC

These indicators highlight the scale of the platform’s role in Web3 analytics.

What the Shutdown Means for the RADAR Token and DAO

The end of operations raises questions about the future of the RADAR token and the DappRadar DAO, both of which operate independently from the core company.

DAO Governance and Token Utility Remain Uncertain

The founders said updates will be published through DAO channels, leaving token holders waiting for clarity on governance processes, treasury management, and any potential continuation of token utility.

Why Web3 Analytics Platforms Face Sustainability Challenges

The closure underscores the broader challenges in blockchain analytics. Indexing decentralized applications across dozens of networks requires sophisticated infrastructure that generates high operational expenses.

Blockchain Data Sustainability Becomes Increasingly Complex

As blockchain ecosystems expand, analytics platforms must process more transactions, more protocols, and more chains. Without consistent inflows from enterprise clients or recurring revenue, maintaining such infrastructure remains difficult.

What Comes Next for Developers, Users, and the Web3 Market

The loss of DappRadar creates a data gap for the industry. Developers building new dapps, researchers analyzing trends, and journalists reporting on Web3 market movements may now need to rely on alternative platforms.

Industry Awaits Successor to DappRadar’s Role in Web3 Analytics

The founders expressed hope that new builders will “carry the torch forward,” although no information has been shared regarding open-sourcing the platform’s code, APIs, or datasets.

Luno and Discovery Bank partner to bring in-app crypto trading to South Africans, marking the first institutional banking integration for digital assets in SA.

South Africa’s online retail market surged to R71 billion in 2023, reflecting a 29% increase from 2022. With momentum building, it's expected to break the R100 billion mark by 2026, according to the Online Retail in South Africa 2024 report. However, while e-commerce accelerates, cryptocurrency remains a marginal payment method, with limited adoption among online merchants. The question now is whether Binance Pay can change that.

Binance is betting big on this potential. Its local rollout offers a combination of features aimed at reshaping how South Africans pay online using crypto.

Binance Pay South Africa Crypto Payments with Zero Gas Fees

At the heart of Binance Pay’s offering is zero gas fees and instant settlement in over 100 cryptocurrencies. The service claims to match the simplicity of cards or EFTs, with merchants receiving Rand settlements the next business day. According to Larry Cooke from Binance Africa, this signals a "breakthrough moment" for stablecoins in Africa.

Globally, Binance Pay has processed over $230 billion in crypto payments across more than 300 million transactions. The platform is deeply integrated into the Binance ecosystem, which brings global infrastructure into a local context.

In South Africa, it is now connected to major local gateways like Peach Payments and MoneyBadger. In the first half of 2025 alone, MoneyBadger processed 19,536 crypto transactions worth R7.77 million, showing a small but growing appetite for using crypto for everyday expenses.

From Speculation to Spades and Light Fittings

There is also a noticeable shift in consumer behavior. Instead of holding crypto purely as an investment, South Africans are beginning to spend it on practical goods. Carel van Wyk, co-founder and CEO of MoneyBadger, reported examples such as garden tools and lighting fixtures, suggesting a move toward the mainstreaming of crypto payments for household needs.

This aligns with broader trends highlighted in the Online Retail in South Africa 2024 report, which found that online shopping behavior is expanding across more diverse product categories.

Why Trust, Not Tech, Is the Real Hurdle

Despite these advances, a major obstacle remains: trust. Only 18.6% of South Africans believe online shopping is safe. Even fewer (19.7%) feel confident entering personal details online. These figures point to a serious trust gap in the digital commerce space.

The report also shows that 26.9% of cart abandonments happen because users don’t feel comfortable sharing credit card data. In theory, Binance Pay can solve this by eliminating the need for cards. However, replacing one layer of perceived risk with another unfamiliar one may not be enough to reassure a skeptical audience.

Traditional Payments Still Dominate

Binance Pay is entering a space already dominated by deeply entrenched and trusted systems. South African retailers almost universally accept credit and debit cards (100%) and EFTs (96%), which are often backed by digital-first banks like TymeBank and Bank Zero. These banks already offer fee-free or low-cost transactions, which dilutes the perceived advantage of crypto’s no-fee pitch.

Moreover, when choosing a payment gateway, businesses prioritize trust (91%) and security (90.6%) well above features like a wide range of payment methods (only 18.1% consider this critical). This means that even advanced crypto features need to first pass the trust test before being embraced at scale.

Accessibility Remains a Barrier

According to Stats SA and the World Wide Worx study, a large portion of the population still faces basic digital literacy challenges. Over 21.6% of consumers "definitely agree" that they don't know how to shop online, while 28.5% still prefer physical stores.

The high rate of mobile phone usage for online shopping (50.4%) presents an opportunity for Binance Pay’s QR code features, but broader adoption will require education campaigns and better onboarding UX to reach those who are not yet comfortable with digital wallets or online checkouts.

Technical Features Don’t Always Solve Real Problems

E-commerce retailers in South Africa report that the top operational challenges are payment failures (18.2%) and customer service issues (16.8%). While Binance Pay promises instant crypto settlements, there is no concrete data yet on how this impacts transaction failure rates compared to traditional card payments.

Furthermore, failed credit card transactions account for over half (52.2%) of cart abandonments, but it's unclear if crypto transactions—especially with wallet compatibility issues and volatile token prices—offer a meaningfully more stable alternative.

Final Thoughts: Promise Meets Practicality

Binance Pay is a strong technical solution with global credibility and local integration. Its features are powerful, and the use cases in South Africa are growing. However, real adoption will require it to overcome non-technical barriers: trust, education, brand familiarity, and integration with consumers’ everyday financial habits.

The opportunity is massive. But so is the gap between tech potential and market reality.

If Binance Pay wants to shift cryptocurrency from a fringe option to a widely accepted payment method in South Africa, it must build more than infrastructure. It must build consumer trust, and that takes more than zero fees, it takes time.

TRON isn’t just surviving the crypto market’s choppy waters, it’s attempting to rewrite the very narrative of what a blockchain network can become. Part fintech backbone, part space-age spectacle, part Wall Street experiment, TRON’s evolving strategy reveals both the promise and paradox of crypto’s mainstream ambitions.

From anchoring the largest share of USDT in circulation to quietly preparing for institutional entry via a Nasdaq listing, TRON’s current arc is less of a linear climb and more of a complex orbit, one that raises pressing questions about decentralization, legitimacy, and what it means to scale a blockchain protocol in 2025.

The Network That Won Stablecoins

While much of the crypto world chases narratives, modular chains, zk-rollups, Ethereum ETF approvals, TRON has cemented itself in a more pragmatic lane: high-speed, low-cost settlement.

By the numbers, the network is staggering. As of July 2025, TRON processes over $20 billion in USDT transfers daily, outpacing Ethereum’s $16 billion. It hosts over $81 billion in USDT, representing more than half of the global supply. And with near-zero gas fees, a 2,000+ TPS throughput, and over 14 billion transactions since 2024, it’s no wonder TRX has posted a 133% year-over-year price gain.

These aren’t hype metrics. They’re infrastructure stats. In a world where remittances, especially in emerging markets, still rely on clunky intermediaries and predatory fees, TRON's positioning as a frictionless settlement layer deserves credit.

But utility alone doesn’t equate to resilience, especially in a market where dominance can be fleeting, and innovation outpaces adoption.

Nasdaq or Not: The Institutional Turn

TRON Inc.’s reverse merger with SRM Entertainment, a $100 million maneuver that lands it on Nasdaq’s boards, signals a calculated pivot into the traditional financial ecosystem. By naming TRX as a treasury asset, TRON Inc. is pulling a page from MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin playbook, betting that institutional visibility will translate into investor trust and long-term legitimacy.

CEO Rich Miller’s bold claim that TRON Inc. could join the Nasdaq 100 by 2028 is both audacious and loaded. It positions TRON as a blockchain that isn’t just content operating outside of the system, it wants to reshape it from within.

Yet this move invites regulatory heat and existential critique. Can a blockchain protocol steeped in decentralization ideals operate harmoniously under SEC oversight and shareholder scrutiny? Will TRON’s code remain as open as its ambition?

And perhaps most critically: What happens when the very foundations of decentralization clash with quarterly earnings reports?

Justin Sun in Orbit: A Personal Brand Goes Interstellar

As if TRON’s Earth-bound aspirations weren’t ambitious enough, founder Justin Sun is preparing to board Blue Origin’s New Shepard for a commercial spaceflight. Symbolic? Absolutely. Strategic? Possibly.

Sun’s $28 million ticket, donated to STEAM education via Club for the Future, cements his status as not just a crypto pioneer but a tech personality with Elon-esque aspirations. His claim that this trip marks “a new chapter in human exploration” intertwines blockchain rhetoric with the mythology of frontier innovation.

But in an ecosystem still grappling with scalability, decentralization, and regulation, some observers might ask: Is this spectacle aligned with TRON’s mission, or a costly distraction?

More pointedly, does a solo spaceflight evoke a decentralized ethos or does it reflect a growing culture of crypto-celebrity centralization?

Between Upgrades and Uncertainty

On the technical side, TRON continues to iterate. A Mainnet 4.8.0 upgrade promises deeper Ethereum compatibility and faster consensus. Its upcoming TronScope Pro analytics tool, geared for Q3 release, will cater to the DeFi data crowd with real-time alerts and cross-chain tracking. And future integrations with platforms like The Graph hint at ambitions far beyond a simple stablecoin rail.

Yet clouds loom. The SEC’s posture on TRX as a potential security remains unresolved. Nigeria’s new ISA 2025 regulatory framework could restrict TRON’s expansion into Africa without clear audits and MoUs. Meanwhile, Ethereum’s ETF tailwinds, Solana’s DeFi resurgence, and even challengers like Remittix (RTX) nibble at TRON’s market share, branding themselves as “TRX 2.0”.

Internally, decentralization metrics raise their own concerns. Over 71% of TRX is held by whale wallets. That concentration might project investor confidence, but it also sets the stage for price instability, especially as TRX approaches critical resistance levels ($0.32–$0.34).

The Verdict: Innovation or Identity Crisis?

TRON has long occupied a curious space in the crypto ecosystem, respected for its throughput and ignored by Ethereum maximalists, loved in emerging markets and questioned by decentralization purists.

Today, its narrative is splitting in two.

One version of TRON is a utility-first powerhouse, delivering low-fee, high-volume financial infrastructure in regions that need it most.

The other is a high-flying, Nasdaq-flirting, spacefaring brand navigating the dangerous intersection of crypto, regulation, and personal ambition.

In trying to be both, hyper-efficient protocol and publicly traded brand, TRON may either redefine what’s possible for a blockchain, or face the identity crisis that many centralized-decentralized hybrids eventually encounter.

Either way, one thing is certain: TRON isn’t just another altcoin anymore. It’s a litmus test for how far crypto can integrate into the systems it once sought to disrupt and what might be lost or gained in the process.

In a crypto landscape increasingly dominated by large-cap narratives and macro market uncertainty, smaller Layer 1 chains face the daunting task of staying relevant. Klever Coin (KLV), a blockchain ecosystem built on deflationary mechanics and a security-first ethos, is attempting just that. With a developer education program rooted in Brazil, ambitious cross-chain interoperability goals, and the promise of full decentralization, Klever is aiming to transition from a speculative token to a utility-driven ecosystem.

But here’s the catch: potential isn’t performance. And in crypto, narrative alone won’t save a project from the gravity of low liquidity, exchange bottlenecks, and developer inertia.

A Market Caught Between Speculation and Substance

The price action of KLV over the past month reflects a common story among microcap assets. After rallying over 20% in 30 days, it pulled back 2.1% in a single day, a likely case of short-term holders exiting. However, the real concern lies beneath the surface - a 59% drop in trading volume within 24 hours, a turnover ratio of just 0.0984, and fragile market depth that amplifies volatility.

These aren’t just technical metrics - they’re red flags for any ecosystem hoping to attract institutional liquidity or developer commitment.

While KLV has outperformed the broader market in recent weeks, the long view tells a different story: -17% over the past year. And with Bitcoin dominance rising to 60.58% and the Altcoin Season Index retreating to 42, the macro tide isn’t exactly turning in Klever’s favor.

Technical indicators reinforce this hesitation. KLV is struggling to breach the 23.6% Fibonacci resistance at $0.002387, with momentum indicators like MACD and RSI offering little conviction either way. In other words, the market’s in wait-and-see mode.

Strategic Depth: From Tokenomics to Tooling

Where Klever does show promise is in its layered strategy - one that goes beyond hype to target adoption through education, developer tooling, and careful architectural upgrades.

1. Brazil as a Launchpad: Klever Academy

The launch of Klever Academy on July 23, 2025, is a bold bet: use education as the wedge into developer adoption. With pilots already completed in Brazilian universities - including partnerships with institutions like Unifor - the project is aiming to onboard 1,000+ new developers within its first regional rollout.

This approach could work. Focusing on an underrepresented developer market like Brazil may allow Klever to build localized strength before expanding globally. But converting education into real on-chain dApp activity is a steep hill - and one few Layer 1s have climbed successfully.

2. Token Supply Discipline and Planned Burns

Klever’s automated burn mechanism, which has already eliminated 94 million KLV, is designed to introduce deflationary pressure as network usage scales. The tokenomics are capped with a hard-coded 10 billion supply, and CEO Bruno “Baiano” Campos has hinted at a large future burn, targeting validator rewards once the blockchain is open-sourced.

Silent buybacks during market dips suggest the team is attempting to stabilize price and increase confidence - but again, absent sustained demand, deflationary mechanics may offer limited relief.

3. KVM and the Interoperability Puzzle

The most anticipated piece in Klever’s roadmap is the Klever Virtual Machine (KVM) - described internally as the "gateway to dApp activity.” Expected to launch on Mainnet in Q3 2025, it will bring EVM-like functionality and enable the deployment of DeFi protocols and dApps in a familiar programming environment.

Cross-chain integration efforts are also accelerating:

Ethereum Bridge is already live on Testnet (Mainnet in Q3 2025).

TRON and Solana Bridges will follow in Q3 and Q4.

By Q4 2025, the Klever Blockchain will be fully open-sourced - a necessary step toward legitimacy in the eyes of developers and institutions alike.

Klever's long-term roadmap even stretches into 2027, with Layer 2 solutions, Decentralized DNS, and Ethereum RPC compatibility. On paper, it's everything a modern blockchain needs.

Security as a Credential: The CertiK Factor

No serious blockchain project can grow today without proving it’s secure, and Klever is well aware.

Its Klever Wallet Operating System (KOS) was certified by CertiK in mid-2025, following a deep audit that confirmed private key protection, transaction signing integrity, and mnemonic safety.

More importantly, the entire Klever Blockchain is undergoing final CertiK review, a precondition for potential listings on Tier 1 exchanges like Binance. In this regard, Klever is doing its homework. But certification alone won’t bring liquidity or user activity - those must be earned through ecosystem adoption.

Improving the Wallet Experience and Branding Playbook

Klever isn’t just building for devs - it’s refining the user experience too.

The Lightning Network integration for iOS users allows near-instant BTC payments with low fees, without needing users to manage liquidity channels or run nodes. Android support is on the way.

The wallet experience is being simplified, with options to abstract seed phrases for users unfamiliar with Web3 norms, all while preserving full non-custodial control.

A notable rebrand has shifted the exchange name from Klever to Bitcoin.me - a move aimed at compliance and better visibility in search engines and app stores.

Together, these updates suggest a push toward mainstream crypto users - not just hardcore developers.

Institutional Strategy: Playing the Long Game

While many blockchain projects chase VC funding to scale, Klever’s leadership is cautious. CEO Campos has said the team is open to capital but wary of the “wrong investors.” The goal is alignment - not just money.

Klever’s strategy in Brazil, including invitations to roundtables with Mercado Livre and top banks, signals a bid to become a blockchain infrastructure layer for institutions. If regulations continue to evolve in Brazil and the U.S., this compliance-first approach could become a differentiator - but that’s a big if.

Critical Outlook: Will Execution Match Ambition?

The blockchain world is full of brilliant roadmaps. What separates the winners is execution.

Klever’s edge lies in its commitment to security, regionally focused developer growth, and low-cost infrastructure. But major risks remain:

Liquidity remains thin, leaving the token vulnerable to large selloffs.

Developer activity is still low compared to Layer 1 incumbents.

The Brazil-first strategy, while unique, may limit global scalability unless successfully expanded.

The coming quarters - especially Q3 2025 - will be pivotal. If the KVM launch, cross-chain bridges, and CertiK certifications converge to unlock developer traction and boost trading volumes, Klever could graduate from a promising underdog to a serious Layer 1 contender.

But if those milestones slip or adoption lags, it risks becoming yet another blockchain with great ideas and no one building on them.

In the ever-expanding galaxy of Web3 wallets, NEAR Mobile is stepping out with a bold claim: it doesn’t just want to join the party, it wants to redefine how mainstream users interact with the blockchain. At the center of this mission is NPro, a utility token designed to power the wallet’s ecosystem. But does this token really hold the potential to bridge Web2 usability with Web3 functionality, or are we simply looking at another over-engineered carrot for user acquisition?

Let’s unpack what makes NPro a fascinating and potentially flawed experiment in token-driven growth.

Unlocking Utility: Perks or Paywalls?

NPro isn’t just another token you farm, swap, or speculate on. According to NEAR Mobile, it’s a gateway to premium wallet features - everything from Apple Pay and Google Pay integrations, cashback on swaps and onramps, to AI-powered chat agents, advanced portfolio analytics, and staking with zero fees.

The more NPro you hold, the more you unlock. This tiered utility model is well-worn in Web3, but its success often hinges on whether users perceive the locked features as genuinely worth the token buy-in. For example, are casual users really clamoring for “AI agents” in their mobile wallet, or will most stick to the basic non-custodial functions that don’t require any tokens at all?

NEAR Mobile’s bet is that premium access will convert users into long-term holders. But history tells us: token-gated utility only works when the locked features feel indispensable, not optional.

The Tokenomics Pitch: "Intrinsic Value" and Liquidity Loops

One of NPro's most striking claims is that it derives “intrinsic value from NEAR staking rewards.” Unlike airdropped tokens launched into the abyss, NPro is designed to be bought back using 50% of the staking rewards generated from NEAR tokens staked with the NEAR Mobile validator. The remaining 50% of rewards are then paired with the purchased NPro and added to the liquidity pool. NEAR Mobile says this system is built to apply “upward price pressure,” even in bearish scenarios.

But let’s pause for a dose of realism. A buyback mechanism may soften price dips, but it’s not a guarantee of appreciation. The assumption that token price will rise even if 45% of users immediately sell is ambitious - and possibly misleading. Sustained demand still matters. Without it, even the cleverest tokenomics can't prevent the slow bleed of market apathy.

Also worth noting is the platform’s claim of “no risk” because users don’t part with their staked NEAR. Technically true, but only half the story. The value of NPro earned from staking remains subject to market forces. So while your NEAR is safe, your NPro is a speculative asset, plain and simple.

Fair Launch, Scarcity, and Burn Mechanics

NEAR Mobile is pushing hard on credibility. The launch of NPro features:

A fixed 10 million token supply, released over five years

A 60% allocation to staking rewards for those using the NEAR Mobile Validator

A bonding curve model that decreases daily emissions, rewarding early stakers

And, perhaps most importantly, a permanent liquidity pool - thanks to burning LP tokens, which makes the liquidity unremovable and prevents rug pulls

On paper, this design checks all the right boxes for a “fair launch.” No presales, no team allocations, no insider minting. Just good old-fashioned staking. This could go a long way in building community trust - assuming the token’s market performance doesn’t undermine user confidence.

The Real Challenge: Getting to 1 Million Users

The big number hanging over all of this? One million. That’s the user goal NEAR Mobile has set - and it’s chasing it with a blend of viral loops, social incentivization, and referral rewards.

Tokens are offered for everything from following on X (Twitter) to inviting friends. But here’s the problem with virality: it doesn’t stick unless the product does. Airdrops can drive clicks, but retention demands actual value. If NEAR Mobile wants to achieve - and sustain - that kind of scale, the app experience must do more than just feel like a crypto wallet with a marketing budget.

There’s also a tension worth pointing out. NEAR Mobile markets itself as offering a “non-custodial and anonymous wallet” while also embracing Web2-style social logins. While this tradeoff may lower onboarding friction, it invites scrutiny over how decentralized or privacy-respecting the wallet truly is.

A Glimpse at the Future: AI and Chain Abstraction

The roadmap doesn’t stop at staking rewards and social campaigns. NEAR Mobile’s long-term ambitions lean into agentic AI, chain abstraction, and NEAR Intents - tools that could allow users to initiate complex blockchain actions (like cross-chain swaps) without touching RPC settings or dealing with gas fee guesswork.

If these features become more than vaporware, NEAR Mobile could leap ahead of competitors. But here’s the rub: building decentralized AI agents and abstracting away multi-chain friction is hard and expensive. The wallet’s success will depend not just on building these tools, but on making them usable and trustworthy for everyday users.

Final Verdict: Promising, But Not Proven

There’s no question NPro is a thoughtfully designed token. From its staking-derived value loop to its permanently locked liquidity pool and fair launch distribution, it reflects the kind of mature tokenomics that Web3 needs more of. NEAR Mobile’s commitment to user growth, innovation, and decentralization deserves credit.

But this is still a high-wire act.

Whether NPro becomes a flagship utility token or fades into the noise of speculative assets will come down to execution, utility, and adoption. Can NEAR Mobile deliver the promised features at scale? Can the token prove its value in a volatile market? Can it build a user base that stays after the rewards dry up?

As with many Web3 plays, the difference between a breakthrough and a flash-in-the-pan lies not in the whitepaper, but in the real-world traction it earns. For now, NPro is one to watch and question, as the race for blockchain’s mainstream moment continues.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is NPro and what is its primary purpose?

NPro is the native utility token of the NEAR Mobile Wallet. It’s designed to enhance user experience, incentivize growth, and ensure the long-term sustainability of the wallet within the NEAR ecosystem. Acting as both a rewards mechanism and feature unlocker, NPro plays a central role in NEAR Mobile’s mission to onboard one million new users and make blockchain tools more accessible and rewarding.

What exclusive features does holding NPro unlock within the NEAR Mobile Wallet?

NPro holders gain access to a range of premium features through a tiered membership system:

Apple and Google Pay card integrations

Cashback rewards for in-app swaps and crypto purchases

AI-powered chat agents for insights and support

Advanced analytics for portfolio tracking

Multiple wallet address management

Fee-free staking and in-wallet transactions

Private customer support and the ability to create payment requests

These are split across tiers: Basic, Ambassador, and Premium, with higher NPro holdings unlocking more advanced capabilities.

How is NPro distributed and what is its initial supply?

NPro has a fixed supply of 10 million tokens, distributed over five years. The allocation breakdown is:

60% – NPro staking rewards

15% – Treasury for wallet development and operations

5% – Founding team

10% – Marketing and community initiatives

10% – Liquidity pool

The primary way to earn NPro early on is by staking NEAR through the NEAR Mobile Validator.

What is the "bonding curve" mechanism and how does it affect NPro?

The bonding curve controls the token emission schedule. NPro token releases decrease over time, from 3,038 tokens per epoch initially to just 25% of that by the final epoch. This gradually reduces supply and increases scarcity, rewarding early adopters and aiming to support long-term value growth.

How is NPro’s value intrinsically linked to NEAR Protocol?

NPro’s price is reinforced by a unique liquidity mechanism tied to NEAR staking rewards. Here’s how it works:

50% of staking rewards are used to buy NPro from the liquidity pool

The other 50% is paired with the purchased NPro and added back as liquidity

This creates a self-sustaining loop that increases liquidity depth and applies continuous buy pressure. If the price of NEAR rises, NPro’s backing strength and potentially its market value rises alongside it.

What are the benefits of staking NEAR with the NEAR Mobile Validator?

Staking NEAR via the NEAR Mobile Validator allows users to:

Earn NPro tokens (especially valuable for early stakers due to higher emissions)

Retain full control of their NEAR principal

Unlock premium features in the wallet through earned NPro

Receive predictable rewards proportional to their stake

It’s a low-risk way to participate in the ecosystem while gaining access to advanced wallet tools.

What is the "Initial Lockup for Liquidity Building" and "Liquidity Permanence via Burned LP Tokens"?

During the first three months, NPro tokens earned via staking will be locked in a smart contract to support initial liquidity formation. This helps stabilize price dynamics before public trading begins.

Additionally, all LP (Liquidity Provider) tokens generated during liquidity additions are burned immediately. This design ensures that liquidity is permanently locked, reducing risk for token holders and protecting against common DeFi vulnerabilities like rug pulls. NEAR Mobile’s team does not receive any directly released tokens, keeping rewards strictly community-driven.

When will NPro officially launch and how can users participate early?

The AI being built today by companies like Google, Meta, and OpenAI is designed to serve its corporate owners, not the users. But what if the future wasn’t centralized? What if user-owned AI became the standard? NEAR Protocol is betting on a radically different future, one where intelligence is personal, portable, and controlled by the user. In this future, AI serves people, not profit margins. The implications of that shift are profound, both technologically and ethically.

From Centralized AI to User-Owned AI: The Shift NEAR Is Championing

In the Web2 era, user data became the product. People traded their privacy for convenience, accepting free services like social media, email, and cloud storage in exchange for being tracked, analyzed, and monetized. The result was an opaque system of algorithms that shaped our digital lives without transparency or accountability.

Web3 emerged with the promise of restoring user sovereignty. However, the reality often proved more complex. The technical challenges of seed phrases, gas fees, and fragmented interfaces left many users feeling excluded. Instead of liberation, the experience became a steep learning curve.

NEAR Protocol has a clear response to this problem: Fork that! It’s time for something radically user-first. Fork the old model.

Why NEAR Protocol AI Is Built for Speed and Scale

AI agents require fast, reliable infrastructure to operate effectively. Whether it’s executing a trade or managing your identity in real time, delays can mean failure. Most blockchains are too slow to support this. With block times under two seconds, NEAR Protocol AI is built to function like a high-performance operating system for intelligent applications.

This isn’t a coincidence. NEAR’s co-founder, Illia Polosukhin, was a co-author of the groundbreaking "Attention Is All You Need" paper that introduced the Transformer architecture. This same thinking informs NEAR’s design philosophy: responsiveness, adaptability, and speed as core pillars for intelligent agents.

NEAR’s Chain Abstraction: Interoperability for Intelligent Agents

An effective AI agent should not be limited to one blockchain. If it can’t interact across networks, its utility becomes severely restricted. NEAR’s Chain Abstraction layer solves this by allowing a single NEAR account to sign transactions across multiple chains including Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Solana.

This unlocks a seamless, multi-chain experience. Your AI agent could optimize your DeFi yields on Ethereum, manage your collectibles on Solana, and handle identity protocols on Bitcoin, all from one unified interface. The complexity disappears, replaced by one intuitive command structure controlled by you.

How Decentralized Digital Agents Could Redefine Online Ownership

At the top of NEAR’s stack are Shade Agents. These aren’t just smart chatbots. They are decentralized digital agents owned and operated by the user, capable of executing sophisticated tasks on your behalf.

These agents can manage digital subscriptions, negotiate service fees, filter communications, and even maintain your privacy settings across platforms. This is a new kind of AI assistant, one that truly works for you. It doesn’t just respond to queries. It proactively acts in your best interest based on rules and preferences that you set.

The Endgame: An Internet of Intelligent Agents

NEAR’s long-term vision is bigger than individual agents. It’s about creating entire systems powered by collaborative agent networks. These agentic protocols could run DAOs, manage funds, analyze data, and operate services without constant human oversight.

Imagine a decentralized venture fund where AI agents handle due diligence and allocate capital automatically. Or a research collective where agents run simulations, analyze results, and share findings across trustless systems. NEAR is building the framework that makes these possibilities real.

Building Trust in User-Owned AI: The Security and Alignment Challenge

Autonomous agents with access to your assets and identity must be built on secure, resilient infrastructure. Bugs, misalignment, or malicious actors could cause serious damage. That’s why NEAR prioritizes security at every level, from smart contract design to user intent alignment.

Ensuring an AI agent understands and accurately executes your goals is not trivial. It requires research, development, and constant iteration. But the payoff is worth it: a digital ecosystem where user-owned AI isn’t just a concept, but a trusted companion in your online life.

Choosing a Future That Works for You

Most of the industry is building stronger AI. NEAR is building AI that’s more yours. Through chain abstraction, fast infrastructure, and autonomous decentralized digital agents, NEAR is delivering the tools for a new kind of user experience—one where control, ownership, and intelligence are finally aligned.

The question isn’t whether AI will shape the future. The question is, who will shape AI?

NEAR Protocol believes the answer should be simple: You.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/582ZkAiusUswvlHp9NoboV?si=aP4nyXxdSAi0b7ZEaPBKSw