Sign up to save your podcastsEmail addressPasswordRegisterOrContinue with GoogleAlready have an account? Log in here.
July 13, 2016Book 2, Chapter 5, Sections 1–5 — The Arguments Usually Alleged in Support of Free Will Refuted, Part 118 minutesPlaySections1. Absurd fictions of opponents first refuted, and then certain passages of Scripture explained. Answer by a negative. Confirmation of the answer.2. Another absurdity of Aristotle and Pelagius. Answer by a distinction. Answer fortified by...moreShareView all episodesBy 4.61616 ratingsJuly 13, 2016Book 2, Chapter 5, Sections 1–5 — The Arguments Usually Alleged in Support of Free Will Refuted, Part 118 minutesPlaySections1. Absurd fictions of opponents first refuted, and then certain passages of Scripture explained. Answer by a negative. Confirmation of the answer.2. Another absurdity of Aristotle and Pelagius. Answer by a distinction. Answer fortified by...moreMore shows like Reformed ClassicsView allChrist the Center126 ListenersLarger Catechism10 ListenersLarger Catechism (practice)2 ListenersReformed Forum329 ListenersShorter Catechism (practice)4 ListenersShorter Catechism12 ListenersReformed Media Review5 ListenersProclaiming Christ23 ListenersReformed Forum14 Listeners
Sections1. Absurd fictions of opponents first refuted, and then certain passages of Scripture explained. Answer by a negative. Confirmation of the answer.2. Another absurdity of Aristotle and Pelagius. Answer by a distinction. Answer fortified by
July 13, 2016Book 2, Chapter 5, Sections 1–5 — The Arguments Usually Alleged in Support of Free Will Refuted, Part 118 minutesPlaySections1. Absurd fictions of opponents first refuted, and then certain passages of Scripture explained. Answer by a negative. Confirmation of the answer.2. Another absurdity of Aristotle and Pelagius. Answer by a distinction. Answer fortified by...more
Sections1. Absurd fictions of opponents first refuted, and then certain passages of Scripture explained. Answer by a negative. Confirmation of the answer.2. Another absurdity of Aristotle and Pelagius. Answer by a distinction. Answer fortified by