
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Bowhunting has a problem: we argue about arrow builds like it’s personal philosophy, then we expect broadheads to land true when the shot is rushed, the footing is bad, and the wind is doing what it wants. The 2026 Arrow Ballistic Study is the cleanest attempt I’ve seen to replace that noise with real measurements using a precision shooting machine, Doppler radar, chronographs, and an independent acoustic chamber, then sorting the results with regression analysis so we can separate what actually matters.
We walk through what they tested and why it’s credible, then translate the big concepts into plain language: drag (trajectory and wind drift), lift recovery (how fast the arrow corrects after a bad launch), and accuracy at 70 yards with both field points and broadheads. On broadheads, the data again favors mechanicals for aerodynamic forgiveness, while fixed blades show a measurable flight penalty that gets worse when the human element shows up. We also talk about speed, because the high-speed testing suggests fast setups do not automatically pay a big accuracy tax if the components are solid.
Then we get into the surprise most hunters overlook: sound. Broadheads and vanes were measured the way deer hear them, and the results point to a “system” mindset where broadhead design and vane choice work together. Finally, we introduce the new FOC protocol and the headline finding: higher FOC predicts tighter broadhead groups, with the real limits coming from dynamic spine and trajectory, not accuracy falling apart.
If you want to build a quieter, more forgiving, more accurate hunting arrow with less guesswork, listen through and then go explore the linked data for yourself. Subscribe for part two, share this with a buddy who’s rebuilding arrows right now, and leave a review. What are you shooting for broadheads and what FOC are you running today?
See James Yates article on the study here: https://westernhunter.net/information/the-2026-arrow-ballistics-study-results/
See the interactive data from Precision Cut Archery here: https://www.precisioncutarchery.com/research/arrow-study-2026
🏹 Shop Extreme Outfitters for all of your archery & bowhunting needs: https://extremeoutfitters.com
Use code ARCHERYPROJECT to save 10%
Quick reads, pro tips, and the latest episodes—delivered straight to your inbox every week.
👉 Sign up here: https://thearcheryproject.com/
✅ Watch the video podcast here!
https://www.youtube.com/@thearcheryproject
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY:
► Facebook: http://bit.ly/44UD7Vo
► Instagram: http://bit.ly/40Q2jLf
By Zakk Plocica5
77 ratings
Bowhunting has a problem: we argue about arrow builds like it’s personal philosophy, then we expect broadheads to land true when the shot is rushed, the footing is bad, and the wind is doing what it wants. The 2026 Arrow Ballistic Study is the cleanest attempt I’ve seen to replace that noise with real measurements using a precision shooting machine, Doppler radar, chronographs, and an independent acoustic chamber, then sorting the results with regression analysis so we can separate what actually matters.
We walk through what they tested and why it’s credible, then translate the big concepts into plain language: drag (trajectory and wind drift), lift recovery (how fast the arrow corrects after a bad launch), and accuracy at 70 yards with both field points and broadheads. On broadheads, the data again favors mechanicals for aerodynamic forgiveness, while fixed blades show a measurable flight penalty that gets worse when the human element shows up. We also talk about speed, because the high-speed testing suggests fast setups do not automatically pay a big accuracy tax if the components are solid.
Then we get into the surprise most hunters overlook: sound. Broadheads and vanes were measured the way deer hear them, and the results point to a “system” mindset where broadhead design and vane choice work together. Finally, we introduce the new FOC protocol and the headline finding: higher FOC predicts tighter broadhead groups, with the real limits coming from dynamic spine and trajectory, not accuracy falling apart.
If you want to build a quieter, more forgiving, more accurate hunting arrow with less guesswork, listen through and then go explore the linked data for yourself. Subscribe for part two, share this with a buddy who’s rebuilding arrows right now, and leave a review. What are you shooting for broadheads and what FOC are you running today?
See James Yates article on the study here: https://westernhunter.net/information/the-2026-arrow-ballistics-study-results/
See the interactive data from Precision Cut Archery here: https://www.precisioncutarchery.com/research/arrow-study-2026
🏹 Shop Extreme Outfitters for all of your archery & bowhunting needs: https://extremeoutfitters.com
Use code ARCHERYPROJECT to save 10%
Quick reads, pro tips, and the latest episodes—delivered straight to your inbox every week.
👉 Sign up here: https://thearcheryproject.com/
✅ Watch the video podcast here!
https://www.youtube.com/@thearcheryproject
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY:
► Facebook: http://bit.ly/44UD7Vo
► Instagram: http://bit.ly/40Q2jLf

4,806 Listeners

1,482 Listeners

267 Listeners

627 Listeners

622 Listeners

1,389 Listeners

46,017 Listeners

351 Listeners

447 Listeners

1,219 Listeners

6 Listeners

381 Listeners

15 Listeners

345 Listeners

165 Listeners