Crowley, Feudalism, and the Limits of Libertarianism
Corrupt adults from Ikebukuro
We start by discussing the so-called psychedelic renaissance—how for decades, serious research into psychedelics was blocked, and now suddenly, studies on LSD, DMT, and psilocybin are making a comeback. But who benefits from this shift? Is it a genuine rediscovery, or just another phase of controlled opposition?
That leads us to the broader world of underground research. We mention neuroscientists working on extended-state DMT studies, trying to keep subjects in a prolonged trip. Is this just curiosity, or are there deeper implications? Could this be another attempt to map consciousness in ways that ultimately lead back to state or corporate control?
From there, we take a detour into the realm of cult figures—Aubrey Marcus, Joe Rogan affiliates, and the archetype of the modern “spiritual entrepreneur.” Is it all just another rebranding of snake oil?
Then, we spiral into Charles Manson discourse. There’s a bizarre subset of people who claim he was misunderstood—a spiritual visionary rather than a manipulative cult leader. Was he a government psy-op? A victim of MKUltra? Or just another guy who realized that California hippies were easy to manipulate?
The conversation then moves toward the Silk Road and Ross Ulbricht. Was he a political prisoner or just a naive libertarian who thought he could outmaneuver the state? We examine the ethics of online black markets, parallel construction by law enforcement, and how Ulbricht’s story became propaganda for both ends of the spectrum.
Next, we explore the global drug trade—from Singapore’s brutal anti-drug policies to fentanyl destroying entire cities. What’s the ideal society for handling substances? Do strict laws create more crime, or does radical libertarianism inevitably lead to chaos?
We then pivot into political philosophy. If societies become too soft, do they collapse under the weight of their own comforts? We analyze Singapore as a case study in authoritarian stability, comparing it to the messier freedoms of the West. Is it better to live in a tightly controlled utopia or a chaotic democracy?
Finally, we dive into Aleister Crowley, Thelema, and the contradictions of libertarian occultism. Crowley envisioned a society where power was distributed through responsibility—those who could handle more responsibility should have more power. This is both hyper-individualist and strangely feudal. If Thelemic governance existed, would it be a form of enlightened dictatorship?
We wrap up by questioning whether freedom is something most people even want. Do people instinctively seek structure? Are we too quick to dismiss hierarchy? And what’s the actual endgame for those who claim to want a more liberated society?
This one was dense, full of weird detours, and probably controversial. Let us know what you think.
Socials:
https://x.com/justinisis1
https://www.instagram.com/justinisis93
https://www.instagram.com/dblv
Channels:
https://www.youtube.com/@BukuroBoys
https://open.spotify.com/show/5TYzulRQh4IVfSatyisxIF
https://neopasseism.substack.com/
Audio Only RSS:
https://anchor.fm/s/f9cb9e3c/podcast/rss
Patreon: Want more? Support us on Patreon to get bonus content and behind-the-scenes discussions.
https://www.patreon.com/BukuroBoys