CAFE Insider

CAFE Insider

By CAFENews
Download on the App Store

CAFE Insider episodes

  • CAFE Insider 07/08: Epstein & Con(Census)

    In today's episode of CAFE Insider, “Epstein & Con(Census),” Preet and Anne break down:

    • The sex trafficking case brought by SDNY prosecutors against disgraced billionaire Jeffrey Epstein who stands accused of sexually exploiting and abusing dozens of underage girls over a course of many years
    • President Trump’s insistence on adding the citizenship question to the 2020 Census, despite the Supreme Court’s decision last month that halts the government from proceeding based on the rationale Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross provided for its inclusion. 


    REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

    JEFFREY EPSTEIN

    • SDNY US Attorney Geoffrey Berman’s press conference announcing the charges against Jeffrey Epstein and the accompanying press release
    • Jeffrey Epstein’s indictment filed by the Southern District of New York: United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein
    • 18 U.S. Code § 1591: Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion
    • 18 U.S. Code § 371: Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
    • 18 U.S. Code § 1594: General provisions
    • 21 U.S. Code § 853: Criminal forfeitures
    • 28 U.S. Code § 2461: Mode of recovery
    • Jeffrey Epstein’s Non-Prosecution Agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, 2007
    • SDNY Judge Kenneth Marra’s opinion holding that prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act in failing to disclose their non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, 2/21/19
    • The Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 18 U.S. Code § 3771
    • “Jeffrey Epstein Arrested for Sex Trafficking of Minors,” The Daily Beast, 7/7/19 
    • “Nude Photos of Underage Girls Seized From Jeffrey Epstein Mansion,” New York Times, 7/8/19
    • “How the Miami Herald investigated Jeffrey Epstein — and his many enablers,” Miami Herald, 11/28/18


    THE 2020 CENSUS & THE CITIZENSHIP QUESTION

    • The Supreme Court decision in Department of Commerce et al. v New York et al. (2019)
    • Transcript from the July 3rd census hearing before US District Court Judge George Hazel of Maryland 
    • Donald Trump’s July 2nd tweet about the Supreme Court’s decision regarding the 2020 Census
    • Donald Trump’s July 3rd tweet that he planned to move forward with adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census
    • “Remarks by President Trump Before Marine One Departure,” White House, 7/5/19
    • “Federal judge in Maryland blocks Trump administration’s plan to add citizenship question to 2020 Census,” Washington Post, 4/5/19
    • “The worst part about DOJ’s reversal on the census is the lack of deliberation,” Washington Post, 7/4/19
    • “Trump just admitted something he probably shouldn’t have about the census citizenship question,” Washington Post, 7/5/19
    • “Judge To Review Claims Of Census Citizenship Question's 'Discriminatory' Origins,” National Public Radio, 7/5/19


    TRUMP’S FOURTH OF JULY SPEECH & TWITTER FUN

    • “President Trump Speaks at 4th of July Celebration,” C-SPAN, 7/4/19
    • “Donald Trump trips up on history in 4th of July speech, mentions airports during Revolutionary War,” USA Today, 7/4/19
    • The tweet detailing the battle for gate C4, 7/4/19
    • “Rep. Steve King steps into Twitter trap and shares tweet calling himself a white supremacist,” NBC News, 7/5/19


    Thank you for being a member of CAFE Insider.

    1 hr 2 min
  • Stay Tuned Bonus 07/04: Heidi Schreck
    In this bonus clip from Stay Tuned, Heidi Schreck discusses the last time an amendment was ratified, historical crushes, her mother’s reaction to her play, and interpreting parental advice. Plus, Preet shares what his dad thought of his book, "Doing Justice."
    The bonus also features clips from Schreck’s play, What the Constitution Means to Me, and a compilation of Stay Tuned listener voicemails responding to the question: What does patriotism mean to you?
    Thank you for being a member of the CAFE Insider community.
    10 min
  • Stay Tuned Bonus 07/04: Heidi Schreck
    In this bonus clip from Stay Tuned, Heidi Schreck discusses the last time an amendment was ratified, historical crushes, her mother’s reaction to her play, and interpreting parental advice. Plus, Preet shares what his dad thought of his book, "Doing Justice."
    The bonus also features clips from Schreck’s play, What the Constitution Means to Me, and a compilation of Stay Tuned listener voicemails responding to the question: What does patriotism mean to you?
    Thank you for being a member of the CAFE Insider community.
    10 min
  • Stay Tuned Bonus 07/04: Heidi Schreck

    In this bonus clip from Stay Tuned, Heidi Schreck discusses the last time an amendment was ratified, historical crushes, her mother’s reaction to her play, and interpreting parental advice. Plus, Preet shares what his dad thought of his book, "Doing Justice."

    The bonus also features clips from Schreck’s play, What the Constitution Means to Me, and a compilation of Stay Tuned listener voicemails responding to the question: What does patriotism mean to you?


    Thank you for being a member of the CAFE Insider community.

    10 min
  • CAFE Insider 07/01: Judging the Jury
    In this episode of CAFE Insider, Preet and Anne focus on: The majority opinion and the dissent in the Supreme Court’s recently decided Flowers v. Mississippi  The dos and don’ts of jury selectionTheir own courtroom war stories
    REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
    FLOWERS V. MISSISSIPPIFlowers v. Mississippi (2019), OyezAudio: The oral arguments in Flowers, C-SPAN, 3/20/19“Excluding Black Jurors in Curtis Flowers Case Violated Constitution, Supreme Court Rules,” New York Times, 6/21/19“Opinion analysis: Justices reverse death sentence for Mississippi inmate,” SCOTUSblog, 6/21/19
    THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONArticle III, Legal Information Institute14th Amendment, Legal Information Institute
    JURY SELECTIONBatson v. Kentucky (1986), OyezJustice Brett Kavanaugh’s article: “Defense Presence and Participation: A Procedural Minimum for Batson v. Kentucky Hearings,” Yale Law Journal, 1989“Learn About Jury Service,” United States Courts TV show: “Bull,” CBS
    DOUBLE JEOPARDYGamble v. United States (2019), Oyez 
    JUDGE ANNE THOMPSONJudge Anne Thompson’s appearance on CAFE Insider“Judge Anne Thompson has seen it all in a long career,” The Trentonian, 11/25/12 
    We hope you’re enjoying CAFE Insider. Email us at [email protected] with your suggestions and questions for Preet and Anne. Thank you for being a part of the CAFE Insider community.
    47 min
  • CAFE Insider 07/01: Judging the Jury
    In this episode of CAFE Insider, Preet and Anne focus on: The majority opinion and the dissent in the Supreme Court’s recently decided Flowers v. Mississippi  The dos and don’ts of jury selectionTheir own courtroom war stories
    REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
    FLOWERS V. MISSISSIPPIFlowers v. Mississippi (2019), OyezAudio: The oral arguments in Flowers, C-SPAN, 3/20/19“Excluding Black Jurors in Curtis Flowers Case Violated Constitution, Supreme Court Rules,” New York Times, 6/21/19“Opinion analysis: Justices reverse death sentence for Mississippi inmate,” SCOTUSblog, 6/21/19
    THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONArticle III, Legal Information Institute14th Amendment, Legal Information Institute
    JURY SELECTIONBatson v. Kentucky (1986), OyezJustice Brett Kavanaugh’s article: “Defense Presence and Participation: A Procedural Minimum for Batson v. Kentucky Hearings,” Yale Law Journal, 1989“Learn About Jury Service,” United States Courts TV show: “Bull,” CBS
    DOUBLE JEOPARDYGamble v. United States (2019), Oyez 
    JUDGE ANNE THOMPSONJudge Anne Thompson’s appearance on CAFE Insider“Judge Anne Thompson has seen it all in a long career,” The Trentonian, 11/25/12 
    We hope you’re enjoying CAFE Insider. Email us at [email protected] with your suggestions and questions for Preet and Anne. Thank you for being a part of the CAFE Insider community.
    47 min
  • CAFE Insider 07/01: Judging the Jury

    In this episode of CAFE Insider, Preet and Anne focus on:

    • The majority opinion and the dissent in the Supreme Court’s recently decided Flowers v. Mississippi  
    • The dos and don’ts of jury selection
    • Their own courtroom war stories


    REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

    FLOWERS V. MISSISSIPPI

    • Flowers v. Mississippi (2019), Oyez
    • Audio: The oral arguments in Flowers, C-SPAN, 3/20/19
    • “Excluding Black Jurors in Curtis Flowers Case Violated Constitution, Supreme Court Rules,” New York Times, 6/21/19
    • “Opinion analysis: Justices reverse death sentence for Mississippi inmate,” SCOTUSblog, 6/21/19


    THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

    • Article III, Legal Information Institute
    • 14th Amendment, Legal Information Institute


    JURY SELECTION

    • Batson v. Kentucky (1986), Oyez
    • Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s article: “Defense Presence and Participation: A Procedural Minimum for Batson v. Kentucky Hearings,” Yale Law Journal, 1989
    • “Learn About Jury Service,” United States Courts 
    • TV show: “Bull,” CBS


    DOUBLE JEOPARDY

    • Gamble v. United States (2019), Oyez

     

    JUDGE ANNE THOMPSON

    • Judge Anne Thompson’s appearance on CAFE Insider
    • “Judge Anne Thompson has seen it all in a long career,” The Trentonian, 11/25/12

     

    We hope you’re enjoying CAFE Insider. Email us at [email protected] with your suggestions and questions for Preet and Anne. Thank you for being a part of the CAFE Insider community.

    47 min
  • Stay Tuned Bonus 06/27: Rachel Barkow
    In this clip from Stay Tuned, Rachel Barkow discusses penal populism, the possibility of a pardon for Navy Seal Ed Gallagher, Justice Scalia’s judicial philosophy, why good writing matters for Supreme Court Justices, and cameras in the courtroom.
    Thank you for being a member of the CAFE Insider community. 
    REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
    ED GALLAGHER“Trump May Be Preparing Pardons for Servicemen Accused of War Crimes,” New York Times, 5/18/19
    JUSTICE SCALIA“The Court after Scalia: A mixed bag on criminal law and procedure issues,” SCOTUSblog, 9/9/16
    9 min
  • Stay Tuned Bonus 06/27: Rachel Barkow
    In this clip from Stay Tuned, Rachel Barkow discusses penal populism, the possibility of a pardon for Navy Seal Ed Gallagher, Justice Scalia’s judicial philosophy, why good writing matters for Supreme Court Justices, and cameras in the courtroom.
    Thank you for being a member of the CAFE Insider community. 
    REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
    ED GALLAGHER“Trump May Be Preparing Pardons for Servicemen Accused of War Crimes,” New York Times, 5/18/19
    JUSTICE SCALIA“The Court after Scalia: A mixed bag on criminal law and procedure issues,” SCOTUSblog, 9/9/16
    9 min
  • Stay Tuned Bonus 06/27: Rachel Barkow

    In this clip from Stay Tuned, Rachel Barkow discusses penal populism, the possibility of a pardon for Navy Seal Ed Gallagher, Justice Scalia’s judicial philosophy, why good writing matters for Supreme Court Justices, and cameras in the courtroom.

    Thank you for being a member of the CAFE Insider community. 


    REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

    ED GALLAGHER

    • “Trump May Be Preparing Pardons for Servicemen Accused of War Crimes,” New York Times, 5/18/19


    JUSTICE SCALIA

    • “The Court after Scalia: A mixed bag on criminal law and procedure issues,” SCOTUSblog, 9/9/16
    9 min

About CAFE Insider

From the publisher's feed

Co-hosts Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance help you to make sense of law and politics each week.