What if the facial recognition match that puts someone behind bars — can't survive a basic courtroom challenge? Right now, systems in stadiums, concert venues, and hotels are flagging faces every single day.

Read the full article: https://www.caracomp.com/podcasts/facial-recognition-court-reliability-crisis

So today we're looking at something that I think is going to reshape how facial recognition technology gets regulated, and probably sooner than most people in the industry expect. There are strong signals right now that regulators are moving toward splitting facial recognition into two completely different legal categories.

Read the full article: https://www.caracomp.com/podcasts/facial-recognition-legal-split-mass-scanning-vs-case-comparison

So here's something interesting that I think a lot of people get wrong, and honestly, it's one of those assumptions that feels so logical you'd never think to question it. The assumption is this: if a photo of a face is sharp, high-res, and crystal clear, then the identity behind it must be real. But that's not how it works.

Read the full article: https://www.caracomp.com/podcasts/clear-not-real-high-resolution-faces-can-be-fake

Today we're talking about something that trips up investigators, lawyers, and honestly most people who work with AI facial recognition — the difference between real-time face analysis and court-ready forensic analysis.

Read the full article: https://www.caracomp.com/podcasts/real-time-face-ai-vs-court-ready-facial-comparison