Cases & Cocktails

Cases & Cocktails

By The Eggleston Law FirmSociety & CultureRelationships
Download on the App Store

Cases & Cocktails episodes

  • Munchausen by Proxy, Manipulation & Criminal Investigations – Ep 33

    In Episode 33 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston are joined by Mike Weber, retired Arlington Police Department officer and co-author of The Mother Next Door: Medicine, Deception, and Munchausen by Proxy. This eye-opening conversation takes listeners deep into the disturbing world of fabricated child illnesses, a criminal form of abuse that is often misunderstood, even by professionals tasked with protecting children.

    To accompany the intense topic, this week’s cocktail is a Lime Green Tea Highball, made with gin, green tea, and lime. While guest Mike Weber sips coffee, Bryan and Janice raise their glasses to a conversation that is both unsettling and critically important.

    What Is Munchausen by Proxy?

    Mike Weber, one of the country’s leading investigators of this abuse, breaks it down: Munchausen by Proxy (now clinically termed “factitious disorder imposed on another”) involves a caregiver—most often the mother—who intentionally exaggerates, fabricates, or induces illness in a child to gain attention or control.

    From feeding children unnecessary medications to faking coma reports and forcing invasive surgeries, these cases are rarely about confusion or concern. As Weber explains: “They know what they’re doing is wrong. That’s why they lie and cover their tracks.”

    Criminal Cases, System Failures & the Role of Law Enforcement

    After retiring from Arlington PD, Weber began working in a district attorney’s office, where he handled over a dozen Munchausen cases between 2009 and 2015. Despite clear evidence and expert collaboration, many cases fell through the cracks due to jurisdictional confusion or prosecutorial reluctance.

    From 2019 through early 2025, Weber investigated 13 additional cases as part of a Texas sheriff’s office. What he discovered is alarming: this form of abuse happens far more often than people think—and it’s often ignored by child welfare systems ill-equipped to recognize or act on it.

    Key takeaways from Weber’s investigative experience:

    ✔ These offenders often present extremely well and are skilled manipulators
     ✔ Most CPS departments lack training, protocol, or proper classifications for this abuse
     ✔ Social media and search history often reveal the most damning evidence
     ✔ Offenders rarely, if ever, stop on their own—they escalate
     ✔ Family courts often unknowingly return children to dangerous homes due to lack of understanding

    A Legal System Not Built for This

    One of the most powerful moments in the episode is Weber’s discussion of how family courts handle (or mishandle) these cases. Because hearings are often short and the system favors quick resolutions, judges frequently dismiss these cases or return children without fully understanding the severity.

    Weber recalls a tragic case where a mother caught on video abusing her child received just six months in jail—and was later awarded custody of three children, including one who would later die under her care.

    He urges attorneys, judges, and investigators to treat these cases with the gravity they deserve, reminding listeners: “These offenders don’t stop. It’s a compulsion—just like a sex offender.”

    What Families and Professionals Can Do

    For parents who suspect this form of abuse, Weber recommends reporting to both CPS and law enforcement. “Report, report, report—and document everything,” he advises. While the system may not respond quickly, building a paper trail is critical.

    Weber offers professional trainings and encourages family law professionals to listen to Season 6 of the podcast Nobody Should Believe Me, which documents one of the most devastating Munchausen cases he investigated.



    37 min
  • Fighting False Allegations—A Father's Story of Resilience – Ep 32

    In Episode 32 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston sit down with guest Scott Mancill, a Texas father who lived through every parent's nightmare: years of false allegations, relentless CPS investigations, and alienation from his own daughter. In a raw, unfiltered conversation, Scott opens up about the emotional and legal toll of protecting his child while preserving his own integrity—and sanity.

    To pair with the intensity of the story, the cocktail of the episode is a Coconut Mojito—G4 tequila, coconut cream, lime juice, and mint. A beachy, calming contrast to a deeply unsettling (but all too common) topic.

    The Beginning of a 10-Year Battle

    Scott's journey started with a contentious divorce and escalated into a decade-long custody battle. While he was awarded primary custody of his daughter, the real fight was only beginning. As Scott explains, the allegations came in waves, beginning with minor accusations and escalating to serious claims, including sexual misconduct, all of which were completely unfounded.

    Despite his innocence, Scott was subjected to:

    ✔ Repeated welfare checks by law enforcement
     ✔ CPS investigations
     ✔ Court hearings and supervised visitations
     ✔ Character attacks online and in the community

    Through it all, he never gave up. “If you walk away,” he says, “it’s like confessing without confessing.”

    Alienation, Mind Games & Mental Health

    One of the most painful aspects of Scott’s story is how his daughter, under the influence of her mother, turned against him. After a brief separation, she returned home like a different child—distant, angry, and distrustful.

    Scott’s strategy? Stay calm. Stay transparent. And never, ever respond emotionally to the bait.

    He never retaliated. Instead, he opened his home—even to officers sent to investigate—and kept meticulous documentation, forwarding every hostile message to his legal team. He also welcomed equine therapy and counseling into their lives, noting that his daughter’s demeanor improved immediately around horses.

    What Helped—and What Didn’t

    Scott credits his survival to a strong support system, including:

    • His mother, who moved in to help manage supervised parenting
    • His brother, who financially supported parts of the legal battle
    • Therapists who guided both him and his daughter through the trauma
    • A legal team that never let up—even after $200,000+ in costs

    He’s also honest about the limits of therapy: “Some counselors were helpful. Others were frustrating. But having someone to talk to, even just to listen, made a huge difference.”

    Life After the Courtroom

    Now that his daughter is nearly 18, Scott reflects on the emotional damage caused by years of litigation. He still carries the “scarlet letter” of online accusations. He’s had personal relationships fall apart because of how his story was misunderstood or weaponized.

    Yet he harbors no bitterness toward his daughter. “I had to remind myself—it wasn’t her. It was what was done to her.” Their relationship, while changed, has healed significantly.

    In a final act of love, Scott forgave $19,000 in back child support owed by his ex—not for her sake, but for his daughter’s. “I did it because I didn’t want my daughter to be guilt-tripped. Not because her mother deserved it.”

    Final Thoughts

    Episode 32 is a must-listen for anyone navigating high-conflict custody cases. It’s a story of patience, perseverance, and the power of parenting in the face of chaos. Scott’s courage in sharing his experience will resonate with families, professionals, and anyone fighting to be heard in a system that often fails the innocent.

    52 min
  • Judge Roy Ferguson on “Lawyer Cat,” Discovery Violations & Private Judging - Ep 31

    In Episode 31 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston welcome a very special guest: the Honorable Judge Roy Ferguson. Known nationwide for the viral “Lawyer Cat” Zoom hearing during the COVID-19 pandemic, Judge Ferguson brings far more to the table than internet fame, offering insight into judicial professionalism, discovery abuse, and the growing need for private judging in today’s overburdened court system.

    The Man Behind “Lawyer Cat”

    Judge Ferguson gained widespread recognition in 2021 after presiding over a virtual court hearing where an attorney appeared as a cat due to a Zoom filter glitch. Instead of embarrassment or contempt, Judge Ferguson responded with calm professionalism: “I’m here live. I’m not a cat.” His response, now iconic, was a masterclass in grace under pressure.

    In the episode, he shares the backstory, revealing that the filter mishap lasted several minutes before the hearing even began. Rather than scolding the attorney, Ferguson prioritized helping resolve the issue and moving the hearing forward, setting an example for judicial temperament and empathy.

    Holding the State Accountable

    More recently, Judge Ferguson made headlines for issuing sanctions against the El Paso District Attorney’s Office for systematically failing to turn over required discovery in felony criminal cases. After a three-day evidentiary hearing, he ruled that the DA’s office had withheld massive amounts of Brady and 39.14 material—critical information the defense was entitled to under Texas law.

    The defense attorneys who brought the motion provided overwhelming evidence, including time-stamped screenshots that showed discovery documents had been mysteriously “backdated” in the state’s online portal. The ruling, which did not dismiss the cases but suppressed improperly withheld evidence, sent a clear message about integrity and accountability in the justice system.

    Defense attorneys described the outcome in one word: validation.

    Introducing Private Judging: A New Alternative for Texas Courts

    With over a decade of experience on the bench and extensive appellate experience, Judge Ferguson now offers private judging—a little-known yet powerful tool in Texas family law. Under Chapter 151 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code, parties can agree to have a retired judge hear their case privately, with all the authority of a public court—but without the delays, stacked dockets, or public scrutiny.

    Private judging (also known as “special judging”) allows for:

    ✔ Custom scheduling with no risk of being bumped
     ✔ Real-time rulings by a dedicated judge
     ✔ Confidential hearings outside the public courthouse
     ✔ Fully enforceable and appealable decisions

    Clients split the judge’s flat-rate fee, and cases are resolved with fewer delays, fewer costs over time, and greater control. As Judge Ferguson explains, “You pay a little more upfront, but you could save thousands by avoiding endless resets, limited hearing time, and waiting months—or years—for your case to be reached.”

    His website, JudgeRoyFerguson.com, outlines available services, scheduling, and more.

    Final Thoughts

    Episode 31 of Cases & Cocktails offers a rare glimpse behind the bench, revealing the humor, humanity, and hard truths of modern Texas courts. Whether you’re a litigator, a parent in a custody case, or just someone who remembers “I’m not a cat,” this episode is packed with insight.

    📅 Tune in next week for another installment of Cases & Cocktails. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for honest legal conversations, real-life case stories, and cocktails served with a twist.

    Would you like a shortened version of this for social media or your newsletter?

    1 hr 19 min
  • Reflections, Ridiculousness & Ranch Water – Ep 30

    In Episode 30 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston celebrate a major milestone—30 episodes of the podcast that blends real-life legal stories, heartfelt conversations, and yes, tequila. This week’s episode is just the two of them, looking back at the journey so far, sharing behind-the-scenes insight, and raising a glass to the stories that have moved them and the listeners they’ve impacted.

    Their celebratory cocktail? A minty spin on a Texas classic: Ranch Water, made with G4 tequila, Topo Chico, fresh lime, and a sprig of mint. Heavy on the tequila, of course.

    A Look Back at 30 Episodes

    Since launching the podcast, Bryan and Janice have interviewed parents, attorneys, advocates, authors, and experts across Texas—many of whom have lived through high-conflict custody battles, parental alienation, addiction, or personal loss. The common thread? Every guest has transformed their hardship into advocacy, mentorship, or education for others.

    From Rod McCall and Robert Garza’s powerful stories to interviews with alienated parents and former clients, the podcast has created space for voices rarely heard in courtrooms. It’s also opened doors beyond the mic: invitations to testify at the Texas Legislature, collaborations with reform advocates, and a growing community of listeners across the state.

    What They’ve Learned—and What Surprised Them

    The Egglestons share how the podcast has changed the way they practice law. Listening deeply to personal stories outside the courtroom has given them fresh perspective and greater patience with clients. It’s also reminded them that legal victories don’t always equate to emotional closure.

    Not every surprise has been positive. Bryan reveals that opposing attorneys have tried to disqualify professionals from family law cases simply because they appeared on the podcast—citing “bias” for having shared their expertise in an open forum. The couple finds this tactic both absurd and ironic, but it’s not stopping them from inviting future guests. If anything, it’s motivation to keep the conversations going.

    The Good, The Absurd & The Future

    They also reflect on the lighter side: sugary rims, wild cocktails, and the occasional on-camera garnish that ends up stuck in Bryan’s beard. The couple jokes about the humble office wall they use as their backdrop and brainstorm future podcast goals, including:

    ✅ Inviting a sitting judge to the podcast
     ✅ Recording on location (yes, beach episodes were mentioned)
     ✅ Featuring more guests with personal family law journeys
     ✅ Expanding into video platforms and maybe—just maybe—getting sponsors

    Despite some online critics (and bathroom stall graffiti, apparently), the Egglestons are all in for the next chapter. The feedback from listeners—including fellow attorneys, judges, and current clients—has been overwhelmingly positive. Many viewers say the stories shared each week offer hope, guidance, and a sense of community during their own legal challenges.

    Final Thoughts

    Episode 30 is a celebration of everything Cases & Cocktails was meant to be—real, unfiltered, and rooted in the shared humanity behind family law. Whether it’s laughter, tears, or tequila-fueled truth bombs, the Egglestons are proud to keep the conversations going.

    📅 Tune in next week for Episode 31. Until then, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more stories, insight, and Texas-sized family law realness—served with a splash of lime.

    23 min
  • Professional Athletes' Contracts, Prenups & Child Support - Ep 29

    In Episode 29 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston sit down with podcast producer Joshua Sharon for a lively (and legally loaded) conversation about high-profile sports contracts, prenups, and celebrity child support cases. Blending pop culture with Texas family law, the episode tackles real legal implications behind recent headlines involving NFL and NBA stars.

    To match the bold topic? A bold drink: the Lavender Fizz—a mix of gin, lavender syrup, lime juice, and Topo Chico (recalled or not). It's a refreshing change of pace for an episode that’s more sports talk radio than courtroom drama—yet still delivers serious legal insight.

    Travis Hunter, NFL Money & Prenup Controversy

    The episode opens with a breakdown of Travis Hunter’s recent wedding—and the Internet’s reaction to the fact that the Heisman Trophy winner and #1 NFL draft pick reportedly did not sign a prenup. The Egglestons explain what this could mean if the marriage were governed by Texas community property law.

    In Texas, any earnings or assets acquired during the marriage—yes, even million-dollar game checks—are presumptively considered community property, subject to a 50/50 division. That’s why, as Bryan puts it, prenups aren’t just for the ultra-rich—they’re a tool for creating clarity, protection, and fairness in advance.

    The team also discusses the importance of full disclosure, independent legal counsel, and the many ways prenups can be customized—everything from asset separation to specific payouts per year of marriage. And yes, even “infidelity clauses.”

    Anthony Edwards & the Lump-Sum Child Support Rumor

    From marriage to parenting, the group shifts focus to NBA star Anthony Edwards and the online rumor that he prepaid 18 years of child support in one check—allegedly around $1.08 million.

    Can you do that? In short: yes—with the right legal agreement.

    Bryan and Janice explain how lump-sum child support payments can work, but only if they are agreed upon by both parties and entered as a formal court order. Otherwise, without a written agreement, such a payment could still leave the door open for future modifications, especially if the paying parent’s income increases significantly—as often happens in pro sports careers.

    The lesson? Without a solid, court-approved agreement, even a $1 million check might not be the end of the conversation.

    Legal Strategy Lessons from the Headlines

    This episode isn’t just gossip—it’s a legal deep dive into what can go right (and wrong) when major life changes meet financial realities. The key takeaways:

    ✔ Prenups can (and should) be tailored to fit your relationship, assets, and goals.
     ✔ Child support orders can be flexible—but only with proper documentation.
     ✔ Judges don’t have the time or context to craft highly personalized orders—negotiated agreements will almost always serve families better.

    And whether it’s a prenup, child support order, or custody agreement, Bryan reminds listeners: “Anytime you can sit down and reach your own deal, you’re in a thousand percent better spot than rolling the dice and letting someone else decide for you.”

    Final Thoughts

    Episode 29 blends sports, law, and hard truths into a conversation that’s both entertaining and educational. From celebrity contracts to the value of proactive legal planning, it’s a reminder that even the most famous families aren’t immune to the complexities of family law.

    📅 Catch the next episode of Cases & Cocktails next week. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more real-life legal stories, personal insights, and cocktails served with a twist.

    38 min
  • Divorce, Taxes & CPA Truth Bombs – Episode 28

    In Episode 28 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston sit down with CPA Michael Boatright for a surprisingly entertaining deep dive into one of divorce’s most overlooked (yet potentially devastating) issues: taxes. Boatright, the managing principal of Boatright CPA and the face behind the unofficial new brand “Taxes, Taxes, Taxes,” joins the couple for a candid conversation about joint returns, IRS liability, tax fraud, and everything divorcing couples need to know—but are rarely told.

    To pair with the tax talk? A bold Bourbon Coffee Flip made with Buffalo Trace, cold brew, and simple syrup. Strong enough to power through some heavy financial topics—yet smooth enough to make it all go down easier.

    What the IRS Cares About—and What It Doesn’t

    One of the biggest takeaways from the episode? The IRS doesn’t care what your divorce decree says. If you and your spouse filed joint tax returns, you’re both on the hook. That’s called “joint and several liability,” and it means the IRS can collect 100% of the balance from either person—regardless of what your court order says about who’s “responsible.”

    This issue comes up all the time in family court, where one spouse insists the other should carry the burden of old tax debt. But as Boatright explains, federal law overrides the divorce decree. If the IRS comes knocking, they’ll take what they can—then you’ll have to turn around and seek reimbursement through state court.

    Innocent Spouse Relief: Rare but Real

    What about cases where one spouse had no idea the other was committing tax fraud or hiding income? There’s something called “innocent spouse relief”—but it’s not easy to qualify for. The spouse must prove they had no knowledge of the wrongdoing and no benefit from it, and the standard of proof is high.

    Boatright walks listeners through how the process works and when it applies. His advice? Don’t count on it. If your name is on the return, you’re probably on the hook.

    Shoeboxes, Feed Buckets & Filing Back Taxes

    In one of the more colorful segments, Boatright recalls the days when clients brought their tax documents in literal buckets—feed buckets, boot boxes, and all. While the firm has modernized since then, the lesson stands: clean records matter, especially during divorce.

    When clients haven’t filed taxes in years—and that’s more common than you might think—it complicates everything from asset division to child support calculations. And if one spouse ran a sole proprietorship? Things can get messy fast.

    Advice for Post-Divorce Taxpayers

    For the spouse who wasn’t the financial decision-maker during the marriage, Boatright stresses the importance of building a support team—CPA, financial advisor, and attorney. “It doesn’t matter if you make $40,000 or $4 million,” he says. “You need professionals who understand your situation and can guide you forward.”

    He also emphasizes planning ahead. Many tax mistakes come from assumptions and bad advice (especially from social media). The best time to talk to a CPA isn’t after the damage is done—it’s before.

    Final Thoughts

    Episode 28 tackles a topic most divorcing couples would rather ignore—but absolutely shouldn’t. From audit risk to return strategies to liability landmines, Michael Boatright breaks it all down with clarity and a sense of humor.

    📅 Catch the next episode of Cases & Cocktails next week. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more legal insight, personal stories, and real conversations about family law in Texas—one case (and cocktail) at a time.

    32 min
  • A Child’s View of Divorce – Episode 27

    In Episode 27 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston sit down with Jessica Waite, a graduate counseling student who shares her deeply personal experience growing up as a child of divorce. The episode offers a unique and emotional look into the long-term impact of divorce through the eyes of someone who lived it—and who is now preparing to help others navigate similar experiences through therapy.

    To complement the conversation, the cocktail of the day is a Pineapple Coconut Margarita—made with tequila, lime juice, pineapple juice, and cream of coconut—first enjoyed by Janice on Mother’s Day and now served up for a powerful discussion on emotional growth and healing.

    From Barn Living to Emotional Insight: Jessica’s Story

    Jessica’s upbringing was anything but conventional. Raised in a historic barn in Dripping Springs that her parents relocated and rebuilt beam-by-beam, her childhood was unique—and at times, isolating. With no finished walls or even a bathroom until middle school, she remembers feeling hesitant to invite friends over, sensing early on that her family life was different from others.

    Her parents’ relationship was passionate but tumultuous. The divorce process began when she was 13, after years of escalating arguments. She recalls the exact moment her father moved out—opening a curtain (not a door) to say goodbye, signaling the start of a new and uncertain chapter.

    Therapy, Narrative, and Finding Her Voice

    Jessica, now in graduate school at Texas State University, is studying counseling with a focus on narrative therapy—a method that emphasizes separating the individual from their problems and understanding how personal stories and family dynamics shape our sense of identity.

    She explains how this approach helped her understand her own past and why it’s so vital for children of divorce to have a safe, neutral space to process their feelings. Even as a teen, she found solace in therapy, noting that while she didn’t share everything with her counselor, the sessions gave her the freedom to speak openly without hurting either parent’s feelings.

    Jessica emphasizes that therapy is not about reliving trauma, but about creating space to explore thoughts and patterns. “Even good parents can unintentionally burden their children during divorce,” she says, especially when kids feel pressured to manage adult emotions or become a confidant during difficult transitions.

    Advice for Divorcing Parents: Meet Your Kids Where They Are

    As someone who’s lived through a divorce and now studies how to help others heal from it, Jessica offers heartfelt advice to parents: “Your kids are more aware than you think. Even if they don’t bring it up, they’re feeling it. Let them know the door is open when they’re ready to talk.”

    Her story is a reminder that children often carry more emotional weight than parents realize—and that open communication, professional support, and empathy are key to helping them cope during and after a divorce.

    Final Thoughts

    Episode 27 provides a rare, honest perspective from the child’s side of a custody case—and highlights the importance of emotional support throughout the process. Jessica Waite’s insights not only validate the experiences of other children of divorce but also offer valuable lessons for parents, counselors, and legal professionals alike.

    📅 Tune in next week for another episode of Cases & Cocktails! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more powerful stories and expert perspectives on family law in Texas—one case (and cocktail) at a time.

    26 min
  • The Power of Appeals & Passion for Family Law – Episode 26

    In Episode 26 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston welcome a distinguished guest to the show—veteran family law attorney and double board-certified appellate expert Jimmy Vaught.

    The conversation is paired with a Watermelon Chili Lime Cooler, a refreshing mix of tequila, watermelon juice, lime, agave, and syrup—an ideal match for a warm Texas day and a deep discussion on the evolution of family law and appellate practice.

    Welcoming a Legend to the Firm

    The Egglestons proudly announce that Jimmy Vaught is joining their team at The Eggleston Law Firm. With over four decades of experience, including time as a staff attorney for the Texas Supreme Court, Jimmy brings unparalleled knowledge to the table. His dual board certifications in Family Law and Civil Appellate Law make him one of the few attorneys in Texas with this rare distinction.

    Jimmy’s journey into family law wasn’t straight. After working in civil litigation and insurance law, he eventually found his calling in family law, citing a true passion for helping people through life’s most difficult transitions.

    From Prenups to Appeals: A Legal Career Spanning All Angles

    Jimmy’s work covers the full spectrum of family law—from drafting prenuptial agreements to litigating complex divorce cases and handling high-stakes appeals.

    On the podcast, he shares how prenups often involve helping couples navigate financial transparency and future planning, especially in blended families. He also dives into his work on appeals, explaining how appellate law demands precision, structure, and strict attention to deadlines.

    📌 “An appeal is not about whether the judge made the right call emotionally—it’s about whether the judge abused their discretion or made a legal error,” Jimmy explains.

    What Clients Need to Know About Appeals

    Appeals are governed by a rigid process that begins the moment a final order is signed. Jimmy walks listeners through each step—from filing a notice of appeal and ordering the court record to writing persuasive briefs that are often the only arguments the appellate court will consider.

    A few key takeaways from Jimmy’s expertise:

    ✅ Appeals are limited to the record created at trial—no new evidence can be introduced.
     ✅ Most appeals take 12–18 months before a ruling is issued.
     ✅ Oral arguments are rarely granted; success often depends solely on written briefs.
     ✅ Winning an appeal often means the case returns to the original judge for a new trial—potentially in front of the same judge you just challenged.

    Despite the challenges, Jimmy emphasizes the importance of preserving the record at trial. “If objections aren’t made during trial, they’re usually waived,” he says. “Appeals are won or lost based on what’s already in the record.”

    The Human Side of Family Law

    Beyond the technical details, the episode highlights what makes Jimmy such a valued member of the family law community—his collaborative approach and compassion for clients. Both Bryan and Jimmy reflect on how the best family lawyers aren’t combative but instead focused on solutions.

    “It’s not about being enemies in the courtroom,” Bryan adds. “It’s about doing right by your client—and recognizing that a good lawyer on the other side helps the process, not hinders it.”

    Final Thoughts

    Jimmy Vaught’s presence on this episode—and now at The Eggleston Law Firm—is a reminder that the best legal minds are those who never stop learning, collaborating, and fighting for what’s fair. Whether drafting a prenup or navigating a complex appeal, the right lawyer makes all the difference.


    38 min
  • Lawmaking & Custody Enforcement – Episode 25

    In Episode 25 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston step outside the courtroom and into the Texas Capitol to share their experience testifying before a Senate committee in support of a bill addressing custodial interference.

    To complement the high-stakes conversation, the couple sips a Coconut Tequila Cooler—made with Ocho tequila, coconut water, lime juice, and agave. While the drink is refreshing, the topic is anything but light.

    A Lawyer’s Perspective on the Legislative Process

    For the first time, the Egglestons were invited to testify as expert witnesses on a family-law-related bill—one seeking to revise the Texas Penal Code’s treatment of possession interference. They were among the first to speak at the Senate committee hearing, offering testimony in support of a proposal that would hold both parents accountable when one denies the other their court-ordered parenting time.

    What stood out most? The formality, the brevity (each speaker was limited to two minutes), and the genuine attentiveness of the senators. Even seasoned litigators like Bryan and Janice found the experience both exciting and nerve-wracking. But more than that, it revealed just how misunderstood basic custody terms are—even among lawmakers.

    Understanding the Proposed Bill: A “Three Strikes” Model for Custodial Interference

    Currently, the Texas Penal Code allows for criminal charges only when the noncustodial parent violates visitation terms. The new bill—authored by Robert Garza and sponsored by Senator Angela Paxton—removes the outdated “custodial” and “noncustodial” designations and applies equally to either parent.

    Here’s how the amendment would work:

    ✅ First Offense – A Class C misdemeanor citation (a simple ticket)
     ✅ Second Offense – Another citation
     ✅ Third Offense – A state jail felony

    This model allows law enforcement to respond immediately when a parent denies visitation. It removes the burden from the other parent to initiate costly and time-consuming enforcement litigation, while also giving repeat violations serious consequences.

    As Janice explains, “It’s about giving officers the tools they need to act in the moment—before things escalate into more serious family disruptions.”

    Challenging Dangerous Assumptions in Family Law

    During their visit to the Capitol, the Egglestons witnessed a heated exchange on the Senate floor where one senator openly opposed the bill. Her reasoning? That the custodial parent is the “better” parent and should be trusted to override the court’s orders.

    Bryan and Janice found this perspective not only incorrect—but dangerous.

    The labels “custodial” and “noncustodial” are administrative and often rooted in child support designations. They do not reflect parenting quality, nor do they define legal rights. As the Egglestons emphasize in the episode, family law is based on orders, not titles. If a parent believes a court order is no longer appropriate, the solution is to seek a legal modification—not to violate the order on personal judgment.

    Final Thoughts

    This episode offers a behind-the-scenes look at how laws are made—and why family law practitioners need to stay involved beyond the courtroom. The bill in question passed the Texas Senate and is now on its way to the House.

    For families caught in the painful loop of denied visitation, this proposed legislation offers hope for a more practical, enforceable solution. And for legal professionals, it serves as a reminder that education and advocacy are just as important outside the courtroom as in it.



    33 min
  • Healing After Divorce—A Mother & Son's Journey Through Trauma and Therapy – Episode 24

    In Episode 24 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston sit down with Carolyn Bishop and her son Matthew Wright, two guests whose personal stories offer an extraordinary window into the lasting effects of divorce, abuse, and recovery. What makes this episode particularly special? Both Carolyn and Matthew have turned their past trauma into purpose: they are now therapists helping others work through their own emotional challenges.

    This deep and emotional conversation is paired with a summery Peach Sangria, made with tequila, peach liqueur, dry rosé, agave, and fresh fruit.


    From Survival to Service

    Carolyn recounts her experience leaving an abusive marriage, one marked by emotional control and isolation, and how she planned her escape with the help of friends and family. After a harrowing departure that involved crossing state lines with her children, she faced criminal threats and a long custody battle. Though she initially lost primary possession of her children, her persistence and eventual legal action helped restore custody and begin the healing process.

    Matthew, then a child, later chose to live with his father during his teenage years. It was a decision rooted in unresolved anger, confusion, and the promise of fewer rules. Eventually, that choice exposed him to neglect and reinforced the emotional scars left from earlier years. By age 17, after seeing his father's true character and reconciling with his mom, he moved back and began his own healing journey.


    The Power of Therapy (and the Long Road There)

    Carolyn and Matthew both emphasize that healing is never linear. Carolyn credits her transformation to years of therapy, supportive relationships, and specific modalities like Internal Family Systems (IFS) and sand tray therapy. Matthew discusses how giving himself permission to feel anger was a turning point, leading to deep introspection and self-growth.

    Their dynamic as mother and son is open and honest. They share how boundaries, forgiveness, and mutual growth have reshaped their relationship in powerful ways.


    Final Thoughts

    This episode is a testament to the resilience of the human spirit. From fleeing an abusive household to walking the road of recovery together, Carolyn and Matthew show that it is possible not only to survive trauma but also to thrive beyond it.

    Their story resonates with anyone who's experienced the emotional aftermath of divorce or family conflict. If you or someone you know is struggling with similar challenges, know that help is out there, and healing is possible.

    🎧 Listen to Episode 24 now for an intimate, inspiring journey of recovery and hope.


    39 min

About Cases & Cocktails

From the publisher's feed

Cases & Cocktails is your go-to weekly podcast for raw, real, and revealing conversations about family law. Hosted by Bryan & Janice Eggleston of The Eggleston Law Firm,…