
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Fed has cut rates, but it’s still battling hard to fulfill its famous dual mandate: Keep inflation low and employment high. To understand the recent furore over job numbers and its relation to interest rates, editor Peter Green spoke with Tim Mahedy, chief economist at economic consulting firm Access Macro.
BBTW: Is a recession now inevitable?Tim Mahedy: I don’t think it’s inevitable. I do think we’ve inched closer over the last year, and the data we keep getting, particularly in the labor market, shows us that we were closer than we thought last year. There are structural things happening with labor demand and supply that allow you to have fewer job gains every month and not have it be as worrying as it would have been 10 years ago. That said, the pace of job gains over the summer is below the break-even rate. I think we’re at a spot where we’ll start seeing the unemployment rate rise. We are tiptoeing towards that recession. It would require either a change in federal immigration and trade policy, or looser monetary policy to help us stave off a recession.
What got us here?It’s a bunch of things together: We had a big boom in immigration that lifted potential GDP and lifted the equilibrium interest rate, and also some productivity gains from AI. The underlying fundamentals of the economy were stronger in ‘23 and ‘24 than some of us initially thought, and that helped us absorb higher interest rates. Immigration has now gone the exact opposite direction. That’s going to have the opposite impact on potential growth and interest rates. Trade policy, very clearly, is going to be inflationary. It’s going to hurt consumption and investment, especially if it continues to roll out as it does in little announcements over time, in a sequence of one-time shocks. Restrictive monetary policy is also forming this cloud that is both changing the underlying fundamentals of the economy and creating cyclical risk.
What about jobs?Two things are happening. There’s both structural shifts happening in the labor market reducing the demand for labor and the supply — an aging population. College graduates are also not doing great in terms of long term unemployment. That’s really getting hollowed out because of AI. The other thing is that there was a surge in hiring post-pandemic that may have shifted demand from the future. So now we’re in a spot where people are over-hired.
The Fed cut rates by 25 basis points. Will that fix things?This is a really hard time to be making monetary policy. We don’t get these instances often where the dual mandate is truly in conflict.The core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index inflation rates have been increasing for five months. So we’re getting more and more inflation. At the same time, obviously, the labor market is weakening, so the Fed is stuck in a really tough spot where they’re going to have to pick between these things. What they’ve done is to try to split the difference.
Will that work? The New York Fed says we won’t see inflation down to the 2% target until the end of 2027.We’ve now had inflation above the target rate for 53 months. So, you’re talking about six and a half, seven years of inflation above 2% every single month. And you have to either acknowledge that risk and say we’re going to risk that and have inflation go even higher, to cut faster to avoid a labor market decline, or we’re going to have to really get inflation under control and we’re going to raise the risk of a recession. Going down the middle of the road is the most risky strategy.
Going forward, what should we be paying attention to in the job numbers?Look at the monthly pace of your core inflation, look at the concentration of job gains. At this moment, we’re adding jobs, but they’re concentrated in one sector. More than 80% of job gains this year have been in health care and social assistance. That’s a huge concentration. If we’re going to stay at this level of job gains, I’d like to see it spread out a bit. The economy is fragile, and just like your portfolio needs to be diversified, you want to see the economy adding jobs in lots of different places, even if it’s not a lot of jobs.
This interview has been edited and condensed for brevity and clarity.
—Peter S. Green
The usual suspectsWhat do you think of Big Business This Week? Tell us how you really feel in this survey!
The media mirrorGet Big Business This Week in your inbox every week—and read it before everybody else! Sign up today.
The short stackThe way people go to the movies has been changing but don’t be fooled into thinking the future is bleak for movie theaters. In fact, when you crunch the box office numbers they reveal some optimistic trends.
Some analysts panicked when James Camerons’ latest “Avatar” chapter debuted $20 million under box office projections on its opening weekend back in December 2022. But in due course, the film made five times that number in box office, and there is no reason to fret this summer’s box office, either, because numbers seem to be showing us that people tend to go out less for opening weekends of major movies than they used to. Instead, the secret to success for modern movies seems to lie in their long “legs.”
“Superman”, “Weapons,” and “F1: The Movie” each had solid opening weekends, but their real success was in their long legs. Not Aunt Gladys’ stellar gams, but the films’ weekend-to-weekend holds, with each making about three and a half times the amount of their debut weekend over the course of their theater runs. It means people actually liked these movies, told their friends and families to go, or returned themselves.
There have been a few other surprising trends in recent box office numbers. First up, reboots originally bound for streaming have outperformed. Both “Freakier Friday” and the summer’s biggest winner “Lilo & Stitch (2025)” were originally bound for streaming, so Disney would’ve been thrilled if they brought in any money at all, and they did in fact bring in a lot. The Lindsay Lohan reboot bought in almost $150 million and the Lilo and Stitch remake made $423 million domestically.
Different kinds of movies were making a splash in a way they haven’t in a while, with two R-rated horror films, “Weapons” and “Final Destination: Bloodlines” cracking the top 10 domestic summer box office and A24’s romantic dramedy ”Materialists” making over $100 million globally.
There were some surprising losses with films like Pixar’s “Elio” and “Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning”, which made $600 million globally but needed to make around $800 million to justify its $400 million production budget. But those aren’t the main story. Film going culture is rebuilding itself, and the future looks bright with great holds, studios making their streaming content profitable, and variety returning to the big screen.
From the publisher's feed