
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Content warning! This episode talks about an academic research paper titled "ChatGPT is bulls**t", and we've not edited the word out - in fact, we've gone to town with it, talking about the different types of it (in the strictest academic sense). So you may not want to play this in the car on your school run!
The news item discussed is:
Student crafts elaborate AI scheme to pass university exam, gets arrestedhttps://cybernews.com/news/turkish-student-found-using-ai-arrested/
This week's papers discussed are:
Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligencehttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321
Prompting Large Language Models for Zero-shot Essay Scoring via Multi-trait Specialization
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04941
Working Alongside, Not Against, AI Writing Tools in the Composition Classroom: a Dialectical Retrospective
https://uen.pressbooks.pub/teachingandgenerativeai/chapter/working-alongside-not-against-ai-writing-tools-in-the-composition-classroom-a-dialectical-retrospective/
GPT versus Resident Physicians — A Benchmark Based on Official Board Scores
https://ai.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/AIdbp2300192
Evaluating General Vision-Language Models for Clinical Medicine
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.12.24305744v1
Re-evaluating GPT-4’s bar exam performance
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-024-09396-9
Automated Social Science: Language Models as Scientist and Subjects
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11794
Large language models cannot replace human participants because they cannot portray identity groups
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01908
I also mentioned the article about the the Infinite Focus Group, which is here:
https://www.ai-mindset.ai/ai-mindset-newsletter/the-infinite-focus-group
The impact of large language models on university students’ literacy development
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/07294360.2024.2332259?needAccess=true
Do teachers spot AI? Evaluating the detectability of AI-generated texts among student essays
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24000109
Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4
ChatGPT is bullshit
https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5?sharing_token=0CIhP_zo5-plierRq8kkDPe4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY77xTOWyddkW01qGFs1m5zuuoZGBctVlsJF8SbYqcxWi-XzgEYEPiw7xwWi4bMYXJ_1JARDrER9JGdWZOW-UGSkrk_tXPjPh-XWvFNoiFzNlnDUUUEBAztiX9PtP2p6jfI%3D
By Dan Bowen and Ray Fleming3.3
77 ratings
Content warning! This episode talks about an academic research paper titled "ChatGPT is bulls**t", and we've not edited the word out - in fact, we've gone to town with it, talking about the different types of it (in the strictest academic sense). So you may not want to play this in the car on your school run!
The news item discussed is:
Student crafts elaborate AI scheme to pass university exam, gets arrestedhttps://cybernews.com/news/turkish-student-found-using-ai-arrested/
This week's papers discussed are:
Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligencehttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321
Prompting Large Language Models for Zero-shot Essay Scoring via Multi-trait Specialization
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04941
Working Alongside, Not Against, AI Writing Tools in the Composition Classroom: a Dialectical Retrospective
https://uen.pressbooks.pub/teachingandgenerativeai/chapter/working-alongside-not-against-ai-writing-tools-in-the-composition-classroom-a-dialectical-retrospective/
GPT versus Resident Physicians — A Benchmark Based on Official Board Scores
https://ai.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/AIdbp2300192
Evaluating General Vision-Language Models for Clinical Medicine
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.12.24305744v1
Re-evaluating GPT-4’s bar exam performance
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-024-09396-9
Automated Social Science: Language Models as Scientist and Subjects
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11794
Large language models cannot replace human participants because they cannot portray identity groups
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01908
I also mentioned the article about the the Infinite Focus Group, which is here:
https://www.ai-mindset.ai/ai-mindset-newsletter/the-infinite-focus-group
The impact of large language models on university students’ literacy development
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/07294360.2024.2332259?needAccess=true
Do teachers spot AI? Evaluating the detectability of AI-generated texts among student essays
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24000109
Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4
ChatGPT is bullshit
https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5?sharing_token=0CIhP_zo5-plierRq8kkDPe4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY77xTOWyddkW01qGFs1m5zuuoZGBctVlsJF8SbYqcxWi-XzgEYEPiw7xwWi4bMYXJ_1JARDrER9JGdWZOW-UGSkrk_tXPjPh-XWvFNoiFzNlnDUUUEBAztiX9PtP2p6jfI%3D

365 Listeners

1,633 Listeners

1,083 Listeners

301 Listeners

342 Listeners

156 Listeners

211 Listeners

489 Listeners

209 Listeners

557 Listeners

267 Listeners

105 Listeners

47 Listeners

41 Listeners

0 Listeners