Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Jordan Belliveau was two years old when he was reunified with his parents in the summer of 2018, months after his own court-appointed guardian ad litem formally objected. Five months later, his mother told police a stranger had abducted him from a park. It wasn't true — she had killed him weeks earlier and buried him behind a recreation center in Largo, Florida.

This episode traces how a two-year-old with an active dependency case ended up back in a home the system had already found unsafe: a magistrate who overruled the one advocate whose sole job was to speak for him, a domestic violence arrest involving a death threat against police that never reached the judge who signed a permanent custody order two days later, and a state review that later found the reunification was driven by the parents' "perceived compliance": not verified change. It also looks at the three-agency structure managing the case (Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, Directions for Living, Eckerd Connects), the reform legislation that followed (Jordan's Law), and how this case compares to others covered on this show, including Nixzmary Brown, Zymere Perkins, and Mason Jet Lee.

Content warning: this episode discusses child abuse, domestic violence, and child death in detail.

Sourcing note: this episode is built from public court records, Florida DCF's own internal case review, and contemporaneous reporting (Tampa Bay Times and others). Direct quotes are used only where they were reported as verbatim; several details: including the resolution of the father's domestic violence charge and the final custody outcome for Jordan's younger sister: are not publicly confirmed, and the episode says so rather than guessing.

Please reach out to me at [email protected] . I love hearing from you to just say hi or if you would like a specific case covered by me.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Between October 2004 and December 2005, New York City's child welfare hotline received at least eight separate reports about one Brooklyn family. On January 11, 2006, seven-year-old Nixzmary Brown died weighing just 36 pounds, having been beaten, starved, and confined to a room in her family's apartment. This episode traces the full case file: the fourteen months of missed warning signs, the trial and conviction of her mother Nixzaliz Santiago and stepfather Cesar Rodriguez, the sweeping reforms that followed inside New York City's child protection agency, and the sobering five-years-later coda of Marchella Brett-Pierce, a second child who died on the same agency's watch. Along the way, the episode draws research comparisons to Baby P, Zymere Perkins, Adrian Jones, Star Hobson, and Arthur Labinjo-Hughes, and closes with hard questions for anyone currently working in the field.

Runtime: 74 minutes

Content warning: This episode contains detailed descriptions of child abuse, starvation, and death. Listener discretion advised.

Sources referenced: NBC News; Wikipedia; New York City Department of Investigation case review; Youth Law Center / New York Times reporting on ACS reforms; Schnitzer & Ewigman, Pediatrics (2005) study on child fatality risk factors; Child Welfare League of America caseload standards; NYC Independent Budget Office review of post-2006 ACS reforms.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Child Protection Files

Episode Description

In the eight months before sixteen-month-old Star Hobson died in Bradford, West Yorkshire, at least five different people who loved her (a family friend, her grandmother, her great-grandfather, her father, her grandfather) independently contacted social services or the police to say she was in danger. Every referral was investigated. Every case was closed.

On the 22nd of September, 2020, Star died in hospital from an abdominal injury a judge would later compare, in terms of force, to a road traffic accident. Her mother's partner, Savannah Brockhill, was convicted of murder. Her mother, Frankie Smith, was convicted of causing or allowing her death.

This episode reconstructs Star's case in full: who Savannah Brockhill and Frankie Smith were, the pattern of referrals and closures between January and September 2020, the CCTV and social media evidence presented at Bradford Crown Court, the sentencing remarks of Mrs Justice Lambert.

Content warning: this episode contains detailed discussion of the sustained abuse and death of a child. Listener discretion is advised.

Case Outcome (as of this recording)

Savannah Brockhill remains in prison serving her life sentence (twenty-five-year minimum before parole eligibility). Frankie Smith is serving her twelve-year sentence and, per multiple news reports, was expected to become eligible for release on licence around September 2026.

Sources and Research Referenced

• Joint National Review into the deaths of Star Hobson and Arthur Labinjo Hughes, Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel (May 2022)
• Independent Office for Police Conduct investigation into West Yorkshire Police (concluded November 2022)
• Sentencing remarks of Mrs Justice Lambert, Bradford Crown Court (December 2021)
• Schnitzer, P. G. and Ewigman, B. (2005), Household Composition and Fatal Child Maltreatment, Pediatrics: on elevated risk associated with an unrelated adult in the household
• Eileen Munro's research on confirmation bias and fixed thinking in child protection decision-making, and her 2011 review of the English child protection system
• Scoping review on child protection workforce turnover, British Journal of Social Work

Discussion Questions

1. What happens in your own system when the same family generates a fifth referral, a sixth, a seventh, from different reporters over a period of months? Is there a mechanism that surfaces the full pattern, or does each new contact start from zero?
2. When a possible motive is offered for dismissing a concern (a family feud, a grudge, disapproval of a parent's relationship or identity), what is the process for testing that explanation against the facts, rather than letting its mere possibility settle the question?
3. If your own team or service is genuinely in crisis, understaffed, high turnover, overloaded, what is being done about that as a safeguarding issue in its own right, not just a staffing problem to be managed around?

This episode is a forensic case analysis presented by a social worker with 14+ years of industry experience. All case details are drawn from public court reporting, sentencing remarks, and official review findings. Prisoner locations and release dates are subject to change and are current only as of the recording date.

Let me know if you would like me to cover any cases by emailing [email protected]

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Episode Notes: Mason Jet Lee: The Full Case File

Mason Jet Lee was twenty-one months old when he died in Caboolture, Queensland, in June 2016, from peritonitis caused by an untreated ruptured intestine, inflicted by his mother's partner, William O'Sullivan, days earlier. The day before his death, a neighbour called Queensland's Child Safety Department and said Mason was being held "like a hostage." The staff member who took the call did nothing and went home. A 2020 coronial inquest found the department's handling of his case "a failure in nearly every possible way," and found Mason should have been removed from the home.

Background: Mason's mother, Anne-Maree Lee, was herself known to protective services from around age fourteen, after a "succession of brutally violent partners"; she was homeless in the year before Mason's death. O'Sullivan, also known to protective services in his own right, had presented at hospital with police involvement in April 2015 reporting suicidal and homicidal ideation. Mason was in O'Sullivan's primary, largely unsupervised care in his final weeks — a dynamic the court suggested was a form of coercive control over Lee.

Research discussed: the "Cinderella effect" (Daly & Wilson) on elevated risk from non-biological caregivers; intergenerational transmission of abuse (Kaufman & Zigler, ~30% transmission rate); coercive control theory (Evan Stark); alarm fatigue/normalization of deviance in high-volume frontline decision-making; pre-verbal child abuse detection risk in children under two.

Legal outcome: O'Sullivan pleaded guilty to manslaughter and child cruelty (9 years, 2018), later increased to 12 years on Attorney-General appeal with a serious violent offender declaration (80% of sentence before parole eligibility). Anne-Maree Lee was sentenced to 9 years for manslaughter and child cruelty (2019), granted parole in 2021.

Themes: how documented risk histories sit in disconnected records systems; the four-year gap between death and public coronial findings; Queensland's repeated cycle of child safety inquiries (four in under three decades); a personal reflection on the frontline worker who "went home."

Sources: Findings of the coronial inquest into the death of Mason Jet Lee (Deputy State Coroner Jane Bentley, June 2020), ABC News Australia, and reporting on the criminal proceedings against Anne-Maree Lee and William O'Sullivan.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Episode Notes — Meika Jordan: The Full Case File

Meika Jordan was six years old when she was tortured to death over several days in November 2011 by her father, Spencer Jordan, and his partner, Marie Magoon, in Calgary, Alberta. Her death came roughly ten weeks after a judge reversed an earlier custody order and returned her to their care, despite the couple having disappeared with Meika and her brother for three weeks that August, surfacing in a homeless shelter, an incident police were directly involved in resolving. As far as the public record shows, Alberta's child protection agency never independently assessed her safety at any point.

Background: Meika's parents separated before 2010; her mother, Kyla Woodhouse, retained primary care until a bitter, year-long custody dispute began after Spencer Jordan started a relationship with Marie Magoon. The episode traces how that dispute, and the family court process that governed it, became the system that ultimately decided where Meika lived, rather than a child protection investigation.

Themes: the structural gap between family court custody proceedings and independent child protection assessment; how a documented, police-involved incident (the shelter disappearance) still didn't trigger a protective referral; a personal reflection on the discomfort of a case with no caseworker file to examine; the five-year gap between conviction and the Supreme Court's landmark ruling on what counts as unlawfully confining a child.

Legal outcome: Convicted of second-degree murder in 2015 (life, no parole for 17 years); upgraded to first-degree murder by the Alberta Court of Appeal in 2016; upheld unanimously by the Supreme Court of Canada in November 2017 (life, no parole for 25 years). The ruling, R. v. Magoon, is now a controlling precedent establishing that coercive control alone, without physical restraint, can constitute unlawful confinement of a child.

Sources: CBC News, Global News, and CTV News trial and appellate coverage; the Supreme Court of Canada's published reasons in R. v. Magoon; contemporaneous Alberta press coverage of the custody proceedings.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Sherin Mathews was three years old when she died in Richardson, Texas, in October 2017, months after a forensic child abuse pediatrician told Texas CPS that fractures found on her body were most likely the result of ongoing abuse in her adoptive home. CPS closed the case anyway in April 2017, concluding the abuse "may have happened prior to her adoption." Seven months later, her adoptive father, Wesley Mathews, reported her missing; her body was found in a drainage culvert two weeks later. He later confessed to force-feeding her milk and to disposing of her body after she died.

Background: Wesley and Sini Mathews, originally from Kerala, India, adopted Sherin (born Saraswati Kumari) from a Bihar orphanage in 2016 through Holt International, despite not sharing her language. Wesley worked in finance at Citigroup; the family was stable, employed, and active in their local Malayali church community: a profile the episode argues made the case easier to deprioritise despite the medical evidence.

Themes: how international adoption oversight actually works and where its gaps sit; how a specialist's clear, credentialed warning can still be overridden by a caseworker's own read of a family; outward stability as a blind spot; a personal reflection segment on the discomfort of suspecting families that look like "success stories."

Legal outcome: Wesley Mathews pleaded guilty to causing serious bodily injury to a child, sentenced to life with parole eligibility after 30 years (June 2019). Charges against Sini Mathews were dropped in March 2019 for insufficient evidence. Texas CPS Commissioner Hank Whitman publicly acknowledged the state failed Sherin; the agency changed procedure to act faster on forensic specialist findings. India suspended Holt International's operations and tightened its adoption process.

Sources: Texas DFPS case reporting, Dallas Morning News, WFAA, CBS Dallas-Fort Worth, Indian press coverage, and trial reporting on Wesley Mathews's 2019 guilty plea and sentencing.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Episode Notes — Zymere Perkins: The Full Case File

Zymere Perkins was six years old when he died in a Harlem apartment in September 2016, after months of escalating abuse by his mother's boyfriend, Rysheim Smith, with his mother, Geraldine Perkins, also complicit. New York City's ACS had investigated five separate reports involving Zymere in the year before his death, including a school report of a broken jaw and knocked-out tooth, and the state later found the agency's casework "grossly incomplete." The case triggered the resignation of ACS Commissioner Gladys Carrión, the firing of three caseworkers, an independent monitor imposed by the state, and fifteen citywide reforms.

Background: Geraldine Perkins was raised by her grandmother and had recently finished high school when Zymere was born; by 2015 she and Zymere were living in a homeless shelter, where she met Rysheim Smith, roughly twice her age, who had a prior drug-related arrest record and no documented employment. Their relationship follows a pattern this show has flagged before: an unrelated adult male partner entering a household and becoming the primary threat to a child.

Themes: converging reports across time not read as an escalating pattern; a mandatory reporter's unambiguous signal (broken jaw, missing tooth) not triggering rigorous investigation; new-partner risk; caseload pressure as a structural (not excusing) factor; institutional accountability reaching commissioner and system level, not just individual caseworkers.

Sources: NYC Administration for Children's Services' December 2016 internal report, the parallel New York State Office of Children and Family Services review, contemporaneous NY press coverage (CBS New York, Gothamist, NBC New York, DNAinfo), and trial reporting from Rysheim Smith's 2020 murder trial.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Episode Notes — Arthur Labinjo-Hughes: The Full Case File

Arthur Labinjo-Hughes was six years old when he died in Solihull, England, in June 2020, after months of sustained abuse at the hands of his father's partner, Emma Tustin, with his father, Thomas Hughes, convicted of manslaughter for failing to protect him. This episode traces the case from Arthur's early childhood through the ten critical days in April 2020 when his grandmother's emergency call, photographic evidence, and a school's follow-up contact all failed to trigger protective action, through the trial, sentencing, and the joint National Review conducted alongside the case of Star Hobson.

Timeline: February 2019 — Olivia Labinjo-Halcrow (Arthur's mother) convicted of manslaughter, loses care of Arthur. August 2019 — Thomas Hughes begins relationship with Emma Tustin. March 2020 — Hughes and Arthur move into Tustin's home amid the UK's first COVID-19 lockdown. April 16, 2020 — grandmother Joanne Hughes photographs bruising, makes emergency call. April 17, 2020 — social worker visit finds only a "faint" bruise, assesses no concern. April 20 — school contacts social services, told no concerns. April 24 — photos sent directly to social services. June 16-17, 2020 — Arthur dies from an "unsurvivable" brain injury. December 2021 — Tustin convicted of murder, Hughes of manslaughter. May 2022 — National Review and MacAlister Independent Review published.

Themes: mandatory reporting and emergency escalation not translating into urgent assessment; a documented discrepancy between a family member's evidence and a professional's same-week findings; COVID-19 lockdown as a structural risk multiplier that removed routine school-based observation; failure to convene a required Strategy Meeting before a high-risk home visit; the gap between intense public/media reaction and slower, harder-to-see structural reform.

Sources: Coventry Crown Court trial coverage and sentencing remarks (Mr Justice Wall), the joint National Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel report on Arthur Labinjo-Hughes and Star Hobson (May 2022), the MacAlister Independent Review of Children's Social Care (2022), and contemporaneous UK press reporting.

Production note included in the episode: this case intersects with the COVID-19 pandemic as a genuine structural factor in the failures described, which is treated factually and not as an excuse for the specific decisions made.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Episode Notes — Thirteen Medications: The Lindsay Clancy Case [Developing — Trial Ongoing]

Case: Lindsay Clancy Location: Duxbury, Massachusetts Status: Ongoing — trial nearing conclusion, no verdict as of publication Period covered: 2022–2026 (production date: August 2026)

Key people:

• Lindsay Clancy — former labor and delivery nurse, pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to three counts of first-degree murder
• Patrick Clancy — Lindsay's husband, discovered the children and called 911
• Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy — the three children, ages 5, 3, and 8 months, who died on 24 January 2023
• Rebecca Jollotta — psychiatric nurse practitioner who managed much of Clancy's outpatient care in the weeks before the killings

Timeline:

• December 2016 — Lindsay marries Patrick Clancy
• 2017–2022 — Cora, Dawson, and Callan are born
• Mid-late 2022 — Lindsay's mental health deteriorates following Callan's birth
• Late December 2022 — inpatient admission to McLean Hospital
• 5 January 2023 — discharged from McLean Hospital
• 24 January 2023 — the three children die; Lindsay attempts suicide, is left paralyzed
• September 2023 — indicted on three counts of first-degree murder
• July 2026 — trial begins
• August 2026 — defense rests; closing arguments imminent; no verdict yet

Themes covered:

• Fragmented psychiatric care across multiple providers and institutions with no shared record access
• Rapid escalation of psychiatric medication (13 drugs in 4 months) across multiple prescribers
• Discharge decisions from acute psychiatric care
• What postpartum psychosis actually is, clinically, presented factually and separately from the contested question of whether Clancy experienced it
• Explicit framing as an outlier in this series — no child protection agency involved

A critical note on this episode: Because the trial is unresolved, this episode does not characterize the strength of either side's case or predict the verdict. The central clinical question — whether Clancy experienced postpartum psychosis — is presented as actively contested in court, not settled. This episode will be revisited once a verdict is reached.

Sources: Publicly reported court testimony from the ongoing trial, filed legal motions, and contemporaneous coverage (Boston-area outlets including WBUR and Boston Globe, national coverage including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, and Fox News, and specialist health reporting from NPR, PBS, and Psychiatric Times).

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Episode Notes — Four Days of School: The Kiesha Weippeart Case

Case: Kiesha Weippeart Location: Mount Druitt, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Period covered: 2004–2013

Key people:

• Kiesha Weippeart — the child at the centre of this case, murdered 14 July 2010, age 6
• Kristi Abrahams — Kiesha's mother, pleaded guilty to murder, sentenced to 22 years 6 months (non-parole 16 years, eligible 2027)
• Robert Smith — Kiesha's stepfather, pleaded guilty to manslaughter and being an accessory after the fact, sentenced to 16 years (non-parole 12 years), later granted parole
• Justice Ian Harrison — presided over sentencing at the NSW Supreme Court
• Dr Matthew Orde — forensic pathologist who testified to Kiesha's injuries at sentencing

Timeline:

• April 2004 — Kiesha born
• July 2005 — hospitalised with a bite mark; removed into care
• December 2006 — returned to her mother following anger management counselling
• ~2007 — age 3, discloses a cigarette burn: "Mum did that"; not removed
• 2005–2010 — repeated reports from neighbours, family, and teachers; only 4 days of school attendance in her life
• 14 July 2010 — Kiesha dies after assault; death concealed
• 1 August 2010 — false missing-person report to police
• 3 August 2010 — televised public appeal
• Early 2011 — remains found in bushland at Shalvey
• 2013 — Abrahams and Smith charged and plead guilty
• May–July 2013 — sentencing

Themes covered:

• Reunification decisions based on program completion rather than demonstrated change in risk
• A direct child disclosure that didn't trigger removal
• Reports from multiple independent sources never aggregated into one risk picture
• Extreme school non-attendance as an unactioned red flag
• Intergenerational trauma acknowledged by the sentencing judge, without excusing accountability
• Deliberate public deception (false missing-person report) layered on top of earlier system failures

A note on process: No separate coronial inquest was held in this case, as it proceeded through a full criminal prosecution with guilty pleas. The sentencing hearing and Justice Harrison's remarks serve as the primary official record referenced here. No single named legislative reform tied specifically to this case could be confirmed; it fed into broader, ongoing NSW child protection resourcing debates.

Sources: Agreed facts and evidence from Supreme Court of New South Wales sentencing proceedings, Justice Ian Harrison's published sentencing remarks, and contemporaneous coverage from ABC News and SBS News.