Topic in one line: This section studies the Rosh’s fuller treatment in Bava Kamma of when a litigant may demand to go to the Beit Din HaGadol, and how to prevent false claims from being used as pressure.

Topic in one line: This section presents the Rosh’s third resolution, based on Rabbeinu Tam, distinguishing between a regional center of scholars and the supreme Beit Din.

Topic in one line: This section begins the Rosh’s analysis of the apparent contradiction between the sugyot about whether a defendant can demand to go to a superior Beit Din.

Topic in one line: This section examines additional sugyot that appear to qualify or challenge the rule about when a litigant can demand that the case be moved from the local Beit Din to a greater court.

Topic in one line: This section discusses what happens when litigants disagree about whether their case should be heard locally or before a greater Beit Din elsewhere.

Topic in one line: If the parties appointed a specific group of people to decide their case, even by majority, the ruling is invalid if one of the appointed members withdraws or refuses to state an opinion.

Topic in one line: When the chosen דיינים — dayanim are unsure how to rule, they may consult a greater בית דין — Beit Din, but the final ruling must still be issued by the dayanim before whom the parties appeared.

Topic in one line: A party may not use זבל"א — Zabla to neutralize the other side’s witness by choosing that witness as a דיין — dayan, because of the rule אין עד נעשה דיין — a witness cannot become a judge.

Topic in one line: A litigant cannot disqualify the דיין — dayan chosen by the other party through his own testimony, even together with one other witness, because he is considered נוגע בעדות — personally interested in the testimony.

Topic in one line: In the system of זבל"א — Zabla, the Mishnah discusses whether one party may reject the דיין — dayan chosen by the other party, and the Gemara explains that this depends on whether the dayan is valid or disqualified.