In this podcast titled "The Altar Call," Erroll Hulse provides a critical examination of the modern "invitation system" used in evangelism, arguing that it is both unbiblical and based on a theological misunderstanding of conversion.
Hulse structures his critique around the following key themes:
Hulse argues that the altar call system often produces "false statistics" and a large number of "decisions" that do not result in long-term church involvement.
He cites examples of crusades where hundreds of respondents could not be found in churches six months later.
He recounts his own experience counseling 26 people at a Billy Graham crusade and finding that none truly understood what had happened to them.
He warns that this system creates a "harvest of hypocrites" and leads to the "carnal Christian theory," where people are told they are saved but don't have to live holy lives until a later "second decision".
Hulse disputes the idea that the altar call is an ancient practice, instead tracing its formalization to Charles Finney.
He acknowledges historical accounts of people responding emotionally during revivals (such as those led by Eliezer Wheelock) but argues these were spontaneous reactions, not a manufactured system.
He contrasts the modern system with the "mourners bench" of the 18th and 19th centuries, noting that the latter involved people "grappling with repentance" rather than making a quick, public decision.
Hulse rejects the biblical arguments often used to support the invitation system.
He dismisses the use of Adam and Eve or Abraham as "proofs," calling such interpretations irrelevant.
He points out that when Joshua told Israel to "choose," he followed it by telling them they were "unable" to serve the Lord without genuine repentance and the removal of their idols.
He asserts that Jesus often discouraged superficial followers by speaking "hard truths" and requiring them to count the cost rather than seizing on moments of popularity.
The core of Hulse’s argument is that the invitation system treats conversion as a human-centered response rather than a divine act of creation.
A New Creation: He defines the "New Birth" as a work of God that is not dependent on human will, "overt acts of the body," or emotional manipulation.
Divine Sovereignty: He argues that God is the author of the timing of conversion and may work "unexpectedly" and outside of human techniques.
Preparationism: He suggests that God often prepares a soul over time, and the "decision system" can disrupt this process by "pulling up the plants to see if they're growing".
Hulse concludes by urging a return to the "apostolic" method of preaching: a passionate, universal call to repentance and faith followed by baptism only when there is evidence of a "credible profession of faith". He calls on his peers to resist the "new sacramentalism" of the altar call and instead labor for the establishment of souls in Christ through the doctrines of grace.
1. Lack of Lasting Results
2. Historical Roots
3. Biblical Scrutiny
4. Misunderstanding the New Birth
Conclusion