Here at the Radical Agenda, one of our favorite things about getting involved in the Alt Right was learning about “dog whistles.” Not literal wind instruments for quadrupeds, but messages hidden in plain sight for us wicked white capitalist patriarchs to communicate secretly with one another in public messages.

For example, who knew before Donald Trump ran for president, that “America First” was anti semitic? Here I was this whole time thinking that putting one’s country first was just normal, especially for a President. As it turns out, what is good for America and what is good for Jews are diametrically opposed, and therefore “America First” is thoughtcrime. That “OK” hand symbol? Turns out that actually means “White Power,” because one can trace “WP” inside of it, somehow. I never used to throw up signs like that, but now that I know “White Power” is the same thing as “OK” I do it all the time.

Learning to read in between the lines is a difficult task that not all of us have fully mastered yet. So when I have a chance, I try to educate my audience on what ostensibly respectable people are actually saying.

Take the Stefan Molyneux video below for a great example. I’ve been trying to have a conversation with him for years. Even though I got fired from broadcast radio for defending him, he steadfastly refuses to speak to me, no matter how much money I send him. I don’t hold it against him though, because he has to keep up appearances. Being on that side of the Canadistani border is a hazardous thing for a person with an IQ over 85 these days. Telling the truth can get you locked up there, while enemy prisoners of war are awarded apologies and millions of dollars. Talking honestly with a guy like me could cause him a great deal of trouble. So he talks about “arguments” instead of “physical removal” even though he knows as well as us, that there are no more arguments to be made, and the time for less verbose warriors has arrived. Notice also, how he only refers to the (((people))) ruining the world as “not white Christian males”.

I’m figuring he felt bad about ignoring me, and that’s why he inserted this dog whistle into his latest solicitation for contributions. After skillfully avoiding any mention of the chosenites in a monologue about advertising and media censorship, he tells his audience the following;

Support whoever you find the most powerful, the most compelling, the deepest, the most committed. Find who those people are, support them with everything you’ve got. There’s nothing left to keep in reserve. There’s no reason to keep everything in reserve. I’m going, all out. I invite you please, please, to help those who are leading the way. The icebreakers who are dragging us along to a sunnier climate. Please, please, get behind those who are doing the greatest work. Because if we don’t succeed now, there will be no success possible. If we fail now, there will be nothing left to save.

So, the Patriots just won the Super Bowl. They said it was impossible, that nobody could make a comeback from that far behind that late in the game. I seem to remember hearing something like that last November. But everybody knows the truly important thing about the Super Bowl is the commercials, and I want to talk to you about the one 84 Lumber ran tonight.

In case you haven’t seen it. The ad played during the game was a short spot that began with a Mexican woman being woken up by her daughter. The two head out on a mission to illegally cross the United States border, and along the way the daughter is picking up bits of fabric. It ends with the duo sitting by a campfire in the desert, and a message to see the rest of the journey at their website.

Right here we can remark about the brilliance of the ad. A contentious political issue, being exploited by an advertiser during the most watched television event in the country, to get people to their website. It could pay for itself in controversy alone, or it could turn one or both halves of the country against you. One thing’s for sure, people are going to talk about it.

If you go to the website you see a longer version of the the advertisement. In this one the scene continues into the next morning as the mother and daughter walk the desert with several other people. The daughter is thirsty and asks the mother for water, but she doesn’t have any. So the mother asks fellow travelers for some of theirs, and they provide it, showing what virtuous people they are.

Someone else has a bottle of water too. He’s a brown skinned man working on a construction site along with a diverse workforce of other laborers. The mother and daughter suddenly seem to have lost the nice folks who gave them life saving water, as they approach the newly built border wall which wasn’t nearly half as beautiful as the God Emperor had promised. The daughter opens her backpack, and shows her mother that the fabric she had been picking up along their journey were all red white and blue, and she used them to make an American Flag out of garbage. The mother is so proud, she sheds a tear and hugs the future postmodern art major.

A man is driving away from the construction site. A white man, in a pickup truck, you know the type. He has a bunch of lumber in the back of his truck as he is driving away, obviously feeling good about his day’s work building racist walls.

But, oh wait! The mother sees something a little further down the wall. She urges her daughter to rush toward it with her, and there it is. A big beautiful door on our not so beautiful wall, made out of wood. The scene flashes back to the white man in the truck, then back to the border jumpers. The mother pushes on the door, and it opens, reminding racist white people why they lock their doors, and why we need snipers on the wall.

The scene flashes back to back of the white man’s truck, and the lumber in it. Across the screen appear the words “The will to succeed is always welcome here” and we end with the company logo.

I imagine I’m not the only one who felt pretty good seeing that, at first. It reminds me of a thing I used to believe very strongly in. America is a place where people who are willing to put in the effort can make anything of themselves. A place where we’ve moved beyond physical appearances and live together as a people united under the ideas of freedom, merit, and prosperity. A place that welcomed all who wanted to strive for a better life.

It even tried to bridge the gap between our very polarized political parties, and take some of the wind out of the sails of the left wing insurrectionists trying to overthrow the president. It was done beautifully, and I wish I was your average person who didn’t...

Over the weekend at the Libertarian Party Convention, losing presidential candidate John McAfee added to a growing and troubling anti-white trend in libertarian circles. He told those gathered for the convention “When I first joined the Libertarian party, two things stood out very starkly. One, 75% of you are men. Number two, 99.8% of you are white. Shame on you.” McAfee went on to say “and shame on me for not bringing it up sooner” before lauding himself for marrying a nigger prostitute. That’s right, white man. John McAfee thinks you are less than him if you don’t travel to some third world shit hole and marry a dark skinned hooker.

Moreover, it’s your responsibility, white man, to make sure women and non-whites have the correct ideas. If they disagree with the politics of non-aggression, if they want to initiate force against you, then that’s your fault. You see, in the mind of John McAfee, women and non-whites are not responsible for their own ideas or behaviors. Only white men are capable of having agency, and it is unto them that all responsibilities ultimately fall. 

John should know, after all, how the non-whites operate. He fled his white country, and took all his money south of the border where he married a nigger prostitute and spent his time with black and brown people who kissed his ass over his money. He knows better than anybody just how easy it is to manipulate these inferior races because his failures in the United States were immediately forgotten once he was the richest whitest guy in the poor brown and black neighborhood.

How many of you have McAfee installed on your computers? Those of you who raised your hands, how many of you installed it intentionally? Very few I imagine. John’s software company survives on legacy alone. If your computer didn’t come with McAfee installed, or if McAfee wasn’t installed by some third party bloatware nonsense, you are terribly unlikely to use it because it is garbage. Just like John is, just like his relationship decisions are, and just like his politics are.

John is representative of a growing cancer in our civilization. One that praises failure and seeks ever lower standards for performance, behavior, epistemology, and genetics. For John, it wasn’t lousy enough to make a bloated worthless piece of software. It wasn’t lousy enough to marry a nigger, even if she was a prostitute. It wasn’t lousy enough to lose the libertarian presidential nomination to the anti-libertarian Gary Johnson. His streak of failures and destruction had to continue by shaming the high genetic and intellectual quality of the people in attendance. Don’t let him fool you. This is not about opposing “racism” or trying to bring liberty to more people. He’s trying to take a good thing and ruin it, just like he’s done with everything else in his miserable excuse for a life.

Libertarianism appeals to white males, just like Bitcoin, science, and lots of other awesome things. White men tend to be ahead of the curve on subjects that require some thought, because we’re fuckin awesome (John excluded, of course). Electricity for example, you know, modern medicine, everything we would today recognize as science, these are all products of white males. That other groups came to benefit from them later is a testament to how we benefit the world, and yet these inferior peoples continue to insist we’re somehow “privileged” and in need of having our “privilege checked” in the name of equality.

Well, libertarianism is not about equality. It’s about merit. If non-whites see a competitive market economy as not in their best interests, then they are not going to vote for it. They rather enjoy a system that takes wealth and prosperity from well performing whites, and subsidizes the irresponsible breeding patterns of wild animals in inner city ...

I have an important message to Ted Cruz supporters.

More specifically, the Ted Cruz supporters who did not support Ron Paul. If you were a Ron Paul guy in 2012, consider yourself excused from this particular admonishment, but if you opposed Ron Paul, and now you’re calling into talk radio talking about how Donald Trump is not a “constitutional conservative” then do us all a favor and end your miserable fucking life. I don’t care if you do it with a rope. I don’t care if you do it with a gun. Just don’t waste my time with any of these plea for attention took too many pills things or the cliche horizontal wrist slitting like you’ve never heard the correct way to do this. Do it right the first time or by all means vote Democrat. I’m sick of having you incoherent retards in my primaries.

I don’t want to hear another word about Ted Cruz’s constitutional credentials. If Ted Cruz gave a fucking shit about the constitution, he would not have been running around touting the USA Freedom act as some kind of win for liberty. In case you’re not familiar with that, it took the old federal surveillance model where the federal government disastrously tried to store all the communications records of everyone in America, and it essentially half privatized it. Instead of the federal government building these massive datacenters and getting their water supply cut off by the state of Utah etc… They just forced the communications carriers to store your records and give them to the federal government upon demand. Ted Cruz, voted for this, and in a manner that would make George Orwell frightened, he went around simultaneously calling it a victory for privacy, and saying it expanded the surveillance apparatus of the federal government. Sorry there Teddy, you can’t have it both ways, and last I checked there was nothing in article 1 section 8 about compelling Verizon to spy on me for the federal government.

So you people had more dirt, and blood, and constitutional violations on your hands going into this, than Donald Trump will have at the end of his second term. If you wanted a constitutional conservative, you had Ron Paul. But Ron Paul didn’t want to run around dropping depleted uranium in every third world shithole you can’t find on a globe, and so you supported Mitt fucking Romney and John fucking McCain. So I’m not gonna listen to your whining for one more day.

All these idiots are still clinging to the foreign policy madness that gave us the Iraq war. That’s what Never Trump is about. That’s what took Ted Cruz from long shot underdog to 1st place loser. If you want your war, and your police state, and you don’t even want to use it to execute the communists amongst us, then your whining about the constitution is no better than that of Barack Obama.

The Republican party has a presidential candidate, and he is going to brutalize Hillary Clinton for the next 6 months, and in November you will go to your polling place, and you will vote for him. And if you do not, then you have no more love of liberty or the constitution than does Bernie Sanders. I will not suffer another 8 years under Democrat rule. So either get on board, or lock and load, because the time for Americans to start shooting back was when the first American tax collector was hired. We should have finished that revolution and freed mankind instead of setting up this monstrosity that rules over us today.

Here’s the sad truth, and I don’t like it any more than you do. The Constitution is a dead letter. It’s an ancient text, written by dead men, who aren’t around anymore and in all likelihood had all manner of corruption in their own lives that they weren’t exactly anxious to see history record. The left doesn’t give a fuckin shit about the constitution, they will use every dirty rotten trick they can co...

As I write this, the headline at Drudge Report is about another “voterless victory” for Ted Cruz in the 2016 Republican Primary against Donald Trump. This comes on the heels of him winning the state of Colorado in a similar fashion. On the other side of the spectrum, Hillary Clinton leads Bernie Sanders in delegates to the Democratic convention, in no small part thanks to “Super Delegates” from states where Senator Sanders actually won.

There are mixed opinions about these matters in the public. Some say “those are the rules” and others say it is a perversion of the Democratic process. I say to hell with them both.

The nomination process is rigged, and to the same extent one can say a nominating process should exist, one can also say it should be rigged. The public is unfit to choose rulers for one another. Most Americans have little to no savings, they are heavily in debt, and a growing number of them are increasingly dependent upon the State for their very sustenance. It should come as no surprise then, that a democratically elected government finds itself in an almost identical predicament.

In fact, the government, unhinged from the economic barriers we mere mortals face, is in a far worse position. One which threatens the safety and well being of even its responsible subjects. When those irresponsible voters run up debts in their own lives, their creditors cut them off. When they provoke violent conflicts in their own neighborhood, they wind up dead or in prison. When they do this in the polling place, the fit and capable pick up the tab instead. The honorable fight the battles of the belligerent. The successful pay the debts of the irresponsible. That is a pattern which cannot continue, yet nearly all voters insist that it can and should, in one manner or another.

So yes. The democratic process is rigged, as it should be. The problem, as it were, is those doing the rigging. The Republican and Democratic parties enjoy occupancy in a very unique grey area between public and private institutions. With the benefits of both and the obligations of neither. They occupy power in the exclusively public domain, and when an exclusively private institution is better suited to the task at hand they simply create one on paper, or pay an existing private institution for whatever favor needs doing, often at public expense. When the public is fooled by their lies, they are quite democratic, and when the public gets wise to their tricks, we’re suddenly living in a nation of “laws” once more. Quite convenient, isn’t it? Long live the republic.

As this existential threat becomes more obvious and imminent, various “solutions” abound.

I sympathize strongly with those who say it should all be scrapped and replaced with nothing. The fact of the matter is, we don’t “need” this at all in any real sense. Absent the “services” of the omnipotent State, market forces would surely fill the worthwhile gaps and do away with the bloat.

Sadly, few are familiar with the works of Rothbard and Hoppe. Even those who purport to be libertarians are rarely more than left liberal communist degenerates who fantasize about responsibility free living in some Utopian conflict free paradise. The moment private entities tell them to take their pot smoke and tranny sex shows to their own property (of which there is none) they will be right back to demanding their votes be counted.

That is to say nothing of the teaming masses of enthusiastic voters and taxpayers who expect nothing other than wide open public spaces, government roads, and public security and defense. Let’s not even waste our time talking about the parasitic lower classes who consider the leech lifestyle their birthright as Americans.

Surprisingly, there are still libertarians and conservatives out there who seem convinced Trump is some sort of worst case scenario as a presidential candidate. There are reasons of course to question his conservative credentials, his economic plans, and even his honesty, but anyone qualified to vote in a Republican primary should be able to agree that leftists fleeing the country is a good thing. Trump is the only candidate spurring any such “threats” from our communist neighbors.

Al Sharpton, Raven Symone, John Stewart, Whoopi Goldberg, Rosie O’Donnell, and Samuel L. Jackson are just seven highly recognizable names threatening to leave the country if Donald Trump is elected. This certainly isn’t because he lacks the right wing credentials they expect of a Republican president, but rather because their leftist values are so horribly offended by his mere attitude that they would find living under his rule intolerable.

But it’s not just celebrities plotting their escape. Your average run of the mill Democratic primary voter is also seeking to flee. As results rolled in with Donald Trump dominating the Super Tuesday primaries, Google says searches for “How to move to Canada” spiked 350%. When they did, they surely found out about other Americans who fled during the Bush administration, enjoying the Canadian socialized health care system, strict gun regulations, and leftist multicultural attitudes.

Canadians couldn’t be happier. They celebrate the idea of more leftist Americans pouring across their borders to join the Syrian refugees they are also welcoming. Anyone who will vote to expand the powers of the Canadian government is enthusiastically supported, though dissidents need not apply.

If Canada doesn’t appeal to a particular Clinton enthusiast, the New York Daily News published a list of countries for liberals to escape to should The Donald take the White House. Singapore was touted as the most “well rounded” expat destination, Ecuador the cheapest,  Austria the safest (though they might want to re-evaluate since those numbers are from prior to the migrant crisis), and Mexico as the most “American”. Personally I would have suggested North Korea for its economic policies, or South Africa for their diversity, perhaps Somalia for their attitudes on Christianity, but as long as they get the hell out of America, I don’t care where they go.

With liberals realizing that smashing “RACIST” across their keyboards no longer wins political arguments, they are looking to find the comforting bonds of leftist enslavement elsewhere. Not even Ted Cruz elicits such a response, and he is by any measurement the most conservative candidate in the race. They are even willing to tolerate Marco Rubio’s warmongering and absolute hostility toward privacy and all manner of personal freedom.

With any other candidate, liberals will still be in America.

Right now an estimated 150 men occupy a building at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Harney County, 30 miles South of Burns, Oregon. In defiance of federal authorities, the self described “militia” vows to occupy the building and the land for years to come, and is purportedly prepared to fight to defend it.

The standoff comes as the latest escalation in a decades long conflict between ranchers in the area, and two federal bureaucracies. The Bureau of Land Management, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service have long been buying up land in the area, and becoming increasingly belligerent toward land owners who refused to sell. In 2014 this culminated in an armed standoff between federal authorities and various self described “patriot” groups at a ranch owned by Cliven Bundy, and ended (for the time being) with the retreat of federal agents.

Organized by Cliven Bundy’s son Ammon Bundy, the militiamen claim to stand in defense of the Hammond family – whom the federal government has persecuted for decades over their refusal to sell. The Hammonds have been subjected to perpetual harassment and threats, hundreds of thousands in fines, months in federal prison, and today Dwight & Steven Hammond are expected to turn themselves in to serve a five year minimum sentence over the absurd claim that their efforts to extinguish a fire was terrorism.

The precise details of what led up to the present standoff will be beyond the scope of this post, as they are quite numerous and happened over the course of decades. The Conservative Treehouse has put together an excellent timeline of events for those wishing to have a fuller comprehension of the nature of the conflict, Oath Keepers has also released a statement, and I would encourage everyone to read them. Few seem to truly understand the particularly cruel treatment these fine folks have suffered, or the righteous frustration of the men Twitter liberals have mockingly dubbed #YallQaeda. This is hardly surprising however, since liberals are not known for their capacity to understand complex things.

Suffice to say for our purposes, the federal government is acting as it often does, as a belligerent aggressor operating outside of its purported constitutional boundaries. The entire case stinks of corruption and deceit, and all decent people should be grossly offended by it. I dare say I have a great deal of sympathy for the men who occupy the refuge.

That men would rise in armed rebellion against federal authorities comes to me as neither aberrant nor abhorrent, far from it. The federal government stands guilty of crimes far greater than the one inspiring this particular standoff, and so if there is anything to be said of insurrection, it is only that it is long overdue. I will over the coming paragraphs express some disillusionment with the particular actions of the “militiamen” in question, I will thusly advise against joining them, but this is due in no part to any aversion toward violence. Quite the contrary, I rather find their purported willingness to fight and die, a very hopeful thing indeed.

My objections come merely as a disapproval of resource allocation. If these men are prepared to lay down their lives in a fight against a tyrannical government, I would think it quite the malinvestment to see those lives snuffed out or spent in cages,

I was recently invited to be a guest on the Cop Block Radio show. I was told it was to debate someone about my support for Donald Trump, but the conversation ended up turning to the Black Lives Matter movement and demographic disparities in crime and police encounters.

Unsurprisingly, most of the panel members were outright convinced that we simply live under a white supremacist criminal justice system, and that police were just out hunting down black people for sport. However, as I’ve discussed repeatedly, that is simply not the case. I’m all for curbing police abuse, even ending their profession as we know it. But we can’t do that by lying about reality.

Armed with facts and statistics, I entered the fray. Shockingly enough, not much data was forthcoming from the other panel members. Check out the video below, I feel comfortable saying that it was an unmitigated verbal and intellectual bloodbath. Their copy of the video is presently unlisted as of the time of this posting, and I have been told they are considering deleting the video. Fear not though, I’ve already downloaded it and have embedded my segment below.

This effort is made possible by donors like you. You can also help by shopping through my Amazon affiliate link. Without that support, this site will cease to exist.

Subscribe via email and never miss another post!

[mc4wp_form id=”7723″]

If you have been paying any attention to the goings on in libertarian circles over the last few years, you would probably have a difficult time not noticing the massive buildup of left wing lunacy that has been boiling over as of late. Misandry parading as feminism, anti-white sentiment disguised as anti-racism, crackpot economic theories, promotion of deviant sexual behaviors, pacifism, drugs, you name it. Libertarianism is being laughed out of the human consciousness because so many of those calling themselves libertarians are little more than debaucherous reality detached libertines and sodomites. Murray Rothbard spent some time associating with similar elements after his departure from the National Review back in the 60s, it was a disaster.

I had previously speculated their recent rise had a lot to do with the Ron Paul campaign. Ron Paul’s candidacy was about the single largest boost we’ve seen in people’s interest in libertarianism to date, and it moved the discussion considerably rightward. Simultaneously, it had anti-war Democrats registering Republican for a chance to vote in the primary, and getting involved in libertarian circles.

After being profoundly disrespected at the GOP convention, the movement largely began to embrace its anarchist roots. This seemed very positive at first, libertarians are anarchists whether they realize it or not, after all. But the shift contained a fatal flaw. This was not Rothbardian anarcho-capitalism, it was “voluntaryism”. It embraced the non-aggression principle, or at least it purported to, but it lacked certain underlying presumptions about the reality of the world. Instead, it replaced the ontological structure of the universe with what Rothbard called “The New Menace of Gandhism,” a mystical theology of dogmatic pacifist gobbledegook.

Inside this petri dish of fantastical nonsense, leftism thrived. The leftist elements old and new, recruited to begin vanquishing and shaming their reactionary counterparts. How fantastic the world would be, they told their liberal friends, if they could have all their irrationality and irresponsibility, and yet not have to pay taxes? This became very popular, especially among student groups. Why pay your student loans? We’ll just collapse the government with flower power!

They grew their ranks, and foolishly were celebrated, elevated, and given positions of respect and power within libertarian organizations. Even

When a mass political movement is sparked by sympathy for violent criminals, culminates in race riots and arson, and is amplified by the Democratic Party and President of the United States, we have no right to act surprised when it results in death. Unfortunately, nobody died when a group of whites shot 5 blacks at a Black Lives Matter demonstration in Minneapolis last night.

Unsurprisingly, leftist outfits are trying to portray it as a story of white supremacists terrorising peaceful protesters. But even by their own accounts, you can tell this was not a peaceful act. From USUncut;

Misky Noor, a Black Lives Matter spokeswoman, told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, “A group of white supremacists showed up at the protest, as they have done most nights.” Protesters tried to eject them peacefully when they suddenly opened fire about a block away from the 4th precinct.

 

Similar to what we saw at the University of Missouri, these left wing fanatics attempt to force outsiders from their demonstrations on public property. You can’t “peacefully eject” people from a public place. This requires force and intimidation.

And that’s exactly what the “protesters” did. A video shows two blacks wearing masks and explaining how these “white supremacists” showed up, also wearing masks, carrying a Black Lives Matter sign, and recording the event. The black demonstrators didn’t want the white people wearing masks and demanded they remove them, but the whites refused. It is worth pointing out that everyone at the event is wearing heavy winter clothing due to the weather.

When the whites refused to remove their masks, one of the blacks punched one of the whites, and then another black punched another white. When the whites retreated, the blacks gave chase, and several blocks from the #4thPrecinctShutdown event, the whites drew their weapons and fired on their assailants. Reports are stating that 8 shots were fired, and 5 people suffered non-life threatening injuries.

Minnesota is a “shall issue” state with regard to carry permits, and is also an open carry state. Minnesota statutes don’t mention a duty to retreat, but that duty has been inferred by the courts. Governor Mark Dayton vetoed a bill in 2012 that would have made Minnesota a “stand your ground” state. Still, this was a clear cut case of righteous and legal self defense. The whites were violently assaulted by the blacks, they retreated, and the blacks gave chase. Only after being pursued for several blocks, did the whites turn around, draw their (presumably licensed) firearms, and fire on their assailants.

In Minneapolis, protesters have been camping out in front of the 4th Precinct since Nov. 15, when two MPD officers were involved in the killing of Jamar Clark. More than 50 protesters were arrested on Nov. 16 after they shut down a highway. And on Friday, police announced they had arrested two men for spray-painting profanity on the 4th precinct’s walls. Police also claim to have found molotov cocktails at the encampment.

Clark was shot by police after he attacked a paramedic. Black Lives Matter protesters insist Clark was shot after he was handcuffed, but police say this is completely false and have video of the incident which has not yet been released.