In this special episode, Mark Holthe speaks with immigration lawyer Luca Vukolic about a bizarre Express Entry refusal involving a French citizen and McMaster research associate whose application was refused based on job duties from an entirely unrelated robotics role.

They discuss how generative AI may have been involved in the processing or refusal letter, why human review matters, and what lawyers and applicants should do when an immigration decision appears to rely on incorrect or fabricated facts.

Key Topics Discussed
- AI in immigration processing
- Express Entry refusals
- Incorrect job duty analysis
- Reconsideration and court options

Key Takeaways
- AI-related errors can seriously affect immigration files.
- Refusal letters may contain incorrect facts.
- Applicants must act quickly after a refusal.
- Clear records and organized evidence are essential.

Booster Strategies to Improve Your Chances
- Keep Complete Records
- Save copies of all forms, letters, uploads, and submission confirmations.
- Make Job Duties Easy to Review
- Use clear employer letters and consider a NOC duty-matching table.
- Act Quickly After a Refusal
- File a reconsideration request and protect Federal Court timelines.

Quotes from the Episode

Mark Holthe:
“The question isn’t whether a human clicked the final refusal button. The question is whether the human meaningfully reviewed the actual evidence.”

Luca Vukolic:
“Move quick, prudently, but quick.”

Links and Resources

Watch this episode on YouTube

Canadian Immigration Podcast

Book a consult

Subscribe for More
Stay up-to-date with the latest in Canadian immigration by subscribing to the Canadian Immigration Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, or YouTube. Don’t miss future episodes on policy changes, strategies, and practical advice for navigating Canada’s immigration process.

Disclaimer

This episode provides general information about Canadian immigration and is not intended as legal advice. For personalized assistance, consult an immigration lawyer.