
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Watch this video ad-free on Nebula: https://nebula.tv/videos/city-beautiful-why-did-we-build-high-rise-public-housing-projects
In the spring of 2007, the Chicago Housing Authority demolished the last of the 28 buildings in the Robert Taylor Homes housing project. Robert Taylor Homes is one of several high profile housing project demolitions, from St. Louis’s Pruitt-Igoe to fellow Chicago project Cabrini Green. The demolitions serve as an admission that high-rise public housing wasn’t a good idea. The housing that replaced them are all low rise projects better integrated within existing neighborhoods. So why did anyone back then think it was a good idea? Why did housing authorities build these high rise projects in the first place?
Resources on this topic:
Hunt, D. B. (2001). What Went Wrong with Public Housing in Chicago? A History of the Robert Taylor Homes. Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society, 94(1), 96–123.
"Demolished: The End of Chicago's Public Housing" by David Eads and Helga Salinas. https://apps.npr.org/lookatthis/posts/publichousing/
"When Public Housing Was Paradise" by Joy Connelly https://openingthewindow.com/2011/06/13/when-public-housing-was-paradise-2/
"Elizabeth Wood, 93, Innovator In Early Days of Public Housing" by Bruce Lambert http://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/17/us/elizabeth-wood-93-innovator-in-early-days-of-public-housing.html
"A Brief History of Public Housing" by Jennifer Amy Stoloff https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jennifer_Stoloff/publication/228789405_A_brief_history_of_public_housing/links/5643a68008ae9f9c13e05df6/A-brief-history-of-public-housing.pdf
Video sources:
- Archive.org, Prelinger Archives
Photo sources:
- Wikimedia Commons
- Flickr user Samuel A. Love
- Zahiri, N., Dezhdar, O., & Foroutan, M. (2016). Rethinking of Critical Regionalism in High-Rise Buildings. Buildings, 7(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7010004
Filmed in sunny Sacramento, California.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Many U.S. cities were founded with a street grid. Why? This video describes the historic factors that contributed to the adoption of a grid. This includes influential city designs from Versailles, London, Philadelphia, New York, Chicago, and Reno.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Click https://saily.com/citybeautiful or use the code CityBeautiful to get an exclusive 15% off your first Saily purchase!
U.S. architect Frank Lloyd Wright proposed Broadacre City in the 1930s. It was a vision for a decentralized, low-density city that presaged the exurbs, or the most rural of the suburbs. What did Broadacre City get right, and what did it miss?
Resources on this topic:
- The Disappearing City by FLW: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015047936219
- The Suburbanite of FLW's Broadacre City: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0096144218797923?casa_token=Ym9IPiU9YloAAAAA%3AXniSCLN0XfasavCJ2xLoH8R8ZMlJoJJlWLD483Sb_JpeZ7Ph3R9Lu83YHoJA8n7bPAKhduI-CPYU
Produced by Dave Amos and the fine folks at Nebula Studios.
Written by Dave Amos.
Select images and video from Getty Images.
Black Lives Matter.
Trans rights.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
I'm on Patreon! Consider supporting this channel: https://www.patreon.com/citybeautiful
I live in Sacramento, and when I moved here I learned two things quickly. First, Sacramento summers are hot. Like really hot. Many days are over 100 degrees. The second thing I learned is that Sacramento is livable, even with those high temperatures, thanks to its extensive tree canopy. The trees provide shade that makes me feel about 10-15 degrees cooler, and without them I probably would’ve moved a long time ago. Shade is just one of the many many benefits trees provide in urban areas, and I’m going to count down my favorites, as well talk about what it takes to maintain a verdant urban forest.
Information gathered from these excellent websites:
The Arbor Day Foundation: https://www.arborday.org/trees/benefits.cfm
Friends of the Urban Forest: https://www.fuf.net/benefits-of-urban-greening/
Sources:
A. Wolf, Kathleen L, PhD, University of Washington (2007) City Trees and Property Values. Arborist News. 16, 4:34-36.
B. Donovan, G.H.; Butry, D.T. (2010). Trees in the City: Valuing Street Trees in Portland, Oregon. Landscape and Urban Planning 94:77-83
C. McPherson, Greg, Center for Urban Forest Research via https://www.arborday.org/trees/benefits.cfm
D. U.S. Department of Agriculture via https://www.arborday.org/trees/benefits.cfm
E. Naderi, Jody Rosenblatt, Young Suk Kweon, and Praveen Maghelal (2008). The Street Tree Effect and Driver Safety. ITE Journal on the Web. http://www.naturewithin.info/Roadside/Tree&Driver_ITE.pdf
F. Global Status Report on Road Safety (2015). World Health Organization. (https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=wV40DgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=road+safety+and+speed&ots=DJSBBThVnn&sig=I3zRpXGQVhaEUoonWoi-EGPX2TI#v=onepage&q=road%20safety%20and%20speed&f=false
G. Benefits of Urban Greening. Friends of the Urban Forest. https://www.fuf.net/benefits-of-urban-greening/
H. McPherson, Gregory, James Simpson, Paula Peper, Aaron Crowell, and Qingfu Xiao (2010). Northern California Coast Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs, and Strategic Planting. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/topics/urban_forestry/products/2/psw_cufr790_psw_gtr228.pdf
I. Wolf, Kathy (1998). Urban Forest Values: Economic Benefits of Trees in Cities. Center for Urban Horticulture. https://www.naturewithin.info/Policy/EconBens-FS3.pdf
J. Benefits of Urban Greening. Friends of the Urban Forest. https://www.fuf.net/benefits-of-urban-greening/
K. Lovasi, Gina, James Quinn, Kathryn Neckerman, Matthew Perzanowski, and Andrew Rundle (2008). Children living in areas with more street trees have lower asthma prevalence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. http://jech.bmj.com/content/early/2008/05/01/jech.2007.071894
L. New Varieties of Elm Raise Hope of Rebirth for Devastated Tree (1989). The New York Times. https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1989/12/05/303289.html?action=click&contentCollection=Archives&module=LedeAsset®ion=ArchiveBody&pgtype=article&pageNumber=64
M. Turner, Rob (2015). Nightmare on Elm Streets. Sactown Magazine. http://www.sactownmag.com/April-May-2015/Nightmare-on-Elm-Streets/
Produced in sunny Sacramento, California.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
I just created a Patreon! If you want to support City Beautiful, consider becoming a patron: http://www.patreon.com/citybeautiful
Resources on this topic:
Rational Comprehensive Model: More info here: http://www.geo.fu-berlin.de/en/v/geolearning/watershed_management/introduction_wm/natural_resource_management_planning/how_to_plan/planning_models/rational_planning/index.html
Incrementalism: “The Science of Muddling Through” by Charles Lindblom. http://www.sims.monash.edu.au/subjects/ims5042/stuff/readings/lindblom.pdf
Advocacy Planning: “Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning” by Paul Davidoff. http://urbanpolicy.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Davidoff_1965_Advocacy-and-pluralism-in-planning.pdf
Images copyright 20th Century Fox/Disney/don't sue me, it's fair use
Produced in sunny Sacramento, California.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
I have a Patreon! If you want to support City Beautiful, consider becoming a patron: http://www.patreon.com/citybeautiful
On Friday, Elon Musk tweeted:
“Adjusting The Boring Company plan. All tunnels and hyper loop will prioritize pedestrians and cyclists over cars. Will still transport cars, but only after all personalized mass transit needs are met. It’s a matter of courtesy and fairness. If someone can’t afford a car, they should go first.”
his is a shift from his original plan, where cars would be the primary vehicle traveling through underground tunnels in urban areas. That plan had received lots of criticism from transit advocates and planners. What does this planner think of Elon’s change of course? Stay tuned to find out.
Sources:
https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/972233079342297088
https://www.boringcompany.com/faq/
Photo and video sources:
- The Boring Company
- Omaha World-Herald
- Corevette
- Mariordo
- Maurizio Pesce
Produced in sunny Sacramento, California
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Check out “Beyond the Bleachers”! https://nebula.tv/maapify/beyond-the-bleachers?ref=citybeautiful
Subscribe to Nebula and get $20 off at: https://go.nebula.tv/citybeautiful
Watch this video on Nebula: https://nebula.tv/videos/citybeautiful-can-churches-end-the-housing-crisis-yigby
Faith-based organizations often have more land than they need. They also may want to build housing on that land to further their mission. But they aren't always allowed to. But if they could build housing, it could help end the housing crisis.
Donate to St. John's (if you like): https://www.moreformadison.org
Resources on this topic:
About the amount of church-owned land:
https://ltams.org/what-to-know-when-handling-transactions-involving-church-owned-property/
YIGBY article in Christianity Today:
https://www.christianitytoday.com/2023/09/church-buildings-size-sale-development-multiuse-empty/
Terner Center report on California's YIGBY law:
https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Faith-Based-Housing-Updated-October-2023.pdf
Florida's YIGBY law:
https://www.heraldtribune.com/story/news/local/sarasota/2025/08/04/yes-in-gods-back-yard-law-churches-could-address-housing-crunch/85411086007/
Cities and YIGBY:
https://stateline.org/2025/10/14/can-states-and-a-little-bit-of-faith-convert-church-land-into-affordable-housing/
Produced by Dave Amos and the fine folks at Nebula Studios.
Written by Dave Amos.
Select images and video from Getty Images.
Black Lives Matter.
Trans rights.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Sign up for a 30 day Audible free trial and a free audio book: http://www.Audible.com/CityBeautiful or text citybeautiful to 500500
Check out the latest video on Polymatter: https://youtu.be/NM-odCvJdrI
Support City Beautiful on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/citybeautiful
This idea of free mass transit is not as crazy as you might think. Plenty of cities offer free transit to students and seniors. Some systems offer free transit in designated zones or on certain routes. Others, like Seoul (2), offer free transit on days where the air is too smoggy. Only a few cities have gone all the way and done what I’m proposing: free transit for everyone, everywhere, at all times.
Sources:
A. https://www.citylab.com/environment/2018/01/seoul-takes-on-air-pollution-with-free-public-transit/550829/
B. https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2018/05/estonia-will-roll-out-free-public-transit-nationwide/560648/
C. https://web.archive.org/web/20081020214003/http://www.hasselt.be/content/content/record.php?ID=4418
D. http://www.fdot.gov/research/completed_proj/summary_pto/fdot_bc137_38_ff_rpt.pdf
E. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/27ad/af099f77cee5a1643c896c9ce0cd89647edd.pdf
Produced in sunny Sacramento, California.
Audio and video editing by: Eric Schneider
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Check out “Beyond the Bleachers”! https://nebula.tv/maapify/beyond-the-bleachers?ref=citybeautiful
Subscribe to Nebula and get 50% off at: https://go.nebula.tv/citybeautiful
Watch this video on Nebula: https://nebula.tv/videos/citybeautiful-why-are-city-boundaries-so-weird
Many city limits look like a tangled mess. Why? The answer is a combination of politics, taxes, autonomy, systemic racism, contiguity, and topography.
Resources on this topic:
The Most Segregated City in America: https://www.amazon.com/Most-Segregated-City-America-Birmingham/dp/0813923344
Fiscal case for annexation: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Evgenia-Gorina/publication/326867365_Fiscal_effects_of_municipal_annexation_Evidence_from_a_large_national_sample_of_urban_municipalities/links/652ef34a0ebf091c48fd4511/Fiscal-effects-of-municipal-annexation-Evidence-from-a-large-national-sample-of-urban-municipalities.pdf
Politics in annexation: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/D-Austin/publication/4889705_Politics_vs_Economics_Evidence_from_Municipal_Annexation/links/602d4769299bf1cc26d22040/Politics-vs-Economics-Evidence-from-Municipal-Annexation.pdf
Birmingham info: https://www.bhamwiki.com/w/1970s-1980s_Birmingham_annexations
https://www.nytimes.com/1986/10/10/us/growing-birmingham-irks-neighbors.html
Vestavia Hills info: https://vestaviavoice.com/news/road-to-prosperity-how-two-boundary-crossing-annexations-ves/
Interesting contract cities info I didn't get to in the video: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2683&context=ulj
Produced by Dave Amos and the fine folks at Nebula Studios.
Written by Dave Amos.
Select images and video from Getty Images.
Black Lives Matter.
Trans rights.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
To support City Beautiful and learn more about Brilliant, go to http://brilliant.org/CityBeautiful/ and sign up for free. The first 200 people that go to that link will get 20% off the annual Premium subscription.
Here is Mr. Beat’s video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7-UAcRTW58
Subscribe to Mr. Beat: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmYesELO6axBrCuSpf7S9DQ/?sub_confirmation=1
This video is based on the book Nature’s Metropolis by William Cronon. Check out this amazing book: https://www.amazon.com/Natures-Metropolis-Chicago-Great-West/dp/0393308731/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1534132675&sr=8-1&keywords=nature%27s+metropolis
Chicago is the greatest metropolis in the interior of North America. The region is home to almost 10 million people, 29 Fortune 500 companies, the Obamas, and the 2016 World Series Champion Chicago Cubs. There is no bigger or more influential city between Los Angeles and New York, but Chicago’s dominance was not a foregone conclusion. Why did Chicago grow biggest, bigger than competitors such as Detroit, St. Louis, Cincinnati, or Pittsburgh?
Produced in sunny Sacramento, California.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
From the publisher's feed