What is mainstreaming? In previous generations, most students with special education needs were taught apart from their neurotypical peers, in self-contained classrooms, separate facilities, or even state institutions. Decades of research, however, showed that children with disabilities do better when included in the general education classroom and exposed to peer modeling. Now, school districts are obligated to educate children in the least restrictive environment, also known as inclusion or mainstreaming. But mainstreaming special education students can be complicated and challenging, even for experienced educators.
In this episode, Lisa and Miriam explore a recent surprise ruling from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals that addresses mainstreaming and highlights the potential legal liability that comes with using self-contained settings for children who can be served in the general education classroom. What are the challenges teams face when it comes to determining a child's least restrictive setting? Which factors must districts consider when deciding whether inclusion or a self-contained classroom is best? What benefits must a general education setting provide to a child with severe disabilities to qualify as a least restrictive environment, and what does that instruction look like practically? In this episode, we explore these complicated questions through the lens of the Sixth Circuit's recent ruling in LH v. Hamilton, and consider the wide-range of implications for school boards, administrators, and teachers.
Lisa and Miriam practice education law at Walter Haverfield in Cleveland, Ohio. We love hearing from you! Drop us a line, let us know what you thought, and tell us which education-related legal topics you'd like to hear about in future episodes! Check us out at:
https://www.walterhav.com/professionals/Miriam-M-Pearlmutter (https://www.walterhav.com/professionals/Miriam-M-Pearlmutter)
https://www.walterhav.com/professionals/Lisa-Woloszynek (https://www.walterhav.com/professionals/Lisa-Woloszynek)