Some will say that we should try to remove bias and look at the pros and cons for both sides of an issue. These people are boring naive and wrong. All you need to do is pick a side and then be a cheerleader or used car salesman for that side. They might try to point out that putting out one-sided propaganda is what Hitler did. They may also try to tell you that teaching our kids the persuasive essays format that only looks at supporting evidence is poisoning the future by creating little propagandist. That would be true if we didn't know that our side was right. And sure foreign people will tell you about confirmation bias and cognitive inertia and former cult leaders will tell you how easy it is to lie to yourself. And scientists that study bias will tell you that it's almost impossible to remove bias and see the world clearly. and that might be important for other people to learn but what we need to do is win. We just need to put out more and better propaganda than the other side. That's what I hear.

China and Russia are trying to sew dissension in the United States by amplifying group division hatred revenge and grievances. The media loves to join this process because an outraged American is is a outrage machine product consuming American. Wikipedia is able to take chaos and make order, by focusing people's attention span on their expertise and interest. We can focus Americans' knowledge to construct a cost benefit analysis that will help us compete with China and Russia. America has chaotic groups fighting for power and supremacy. China and Russia control the media and political descent. They don't have rules that govern interactions they have groups that have absolute power. They are able to have long-term strategy while Americans are currently forced to make political decisions through our citizens attention span and outrage amplifying media. However we can have political parties that use reason and Open debate and leverage the power of freedom and chaos to construct open online cost benefit analysis, similar to how Wikipedia allows everyone to participate. We can leverage the power of freedom and reason. We can tie the strength of our conclusions to the strength of the evidence. We can use the power of data to outline pros and cons. We can evaluate the strength of links between evidence and conclusions with linkage scores, we can give each argument a truth score to represent the strength of the truth subarguments, and we can give each argument a impact score to indicate if it was true how important would it be. How big would the cost or benefit be if it was true, would it be important? Let's stop group dynamics by separating into separate groups and trying to get our group to win by demonizing the other group and virtue signaling within our group to rise to the top by being continually more extreme. Let's avoid the passionate intensity on each side. Let's avoid group think. Let's avoid groups being able to punish dissension and independent thought.

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Minimum Acoustic Performance

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies

Low-Emitting Materials

Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan

Indoor Air Quality Assessment

Thermal Comfort

Interior Lighting

Daylight

Quality Views

Acoustic Performance

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification   

Minimum Energy Performance

Building-Level Energy Metering

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

Enhanced Commissioning

Optimize Energy Performance

Advanced Energy Metering

Demand Response

Renewable Energy Production

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

Questions and answers to help you study for the US green building council leed building design and construction certification exam

China and Russia are trying to sew dissension in the United States by amplifying group division hatred revenge and grievances. The media loves to join this process because an outraged American is is a outrage machine product consuming American. Wikipedia is able to take chaos and make order, by focusing people's attention span on their expertise and interest. We can focus Americans' knowledge to construct a cost benefit analysis that will help us compete with China and Russia. America has chaotic groups fighting for power and supremacy. China and Russia control the media and political descent. They don't have rules that govern interactions they have groups that have absolute power. They are able to have long-term strategy while Americans are currently forced to make political decisions through our citizens attention span and outrage amplifying media. However we can have political parties that use reason and Open debate and leverage the power of freedom and chaos to construct open online cost benefit analysis, similar to how Wikipedia allows everyone to participate. We can leverage the power of freedom and reason. We can tie the strength of our conclusions to the strength of the evidence. We can use the power of data to outline pros and cons. We can evaluate the strength of links between evidence and conclusions with linkage scores, we can give each argument a truth score to represent the strength of the truth subarguments, and we can give each argument a impact score to indicate if it was true how important would it be. How big would the cost or benefit be if it was true, would it be important? Let's stop group dynamics by separating into separate groups and trying to get our group to win by demonizing the other group and virtue signaling within our group to rise to the top by being continually more extreme. Let's avoid the passionate intensity on each side. Let's avoid group think. Let's avoid groups being able to punish dissension and independent thought.

Some will say that we should try to remove bias and look at the pros and cons for both sides of an issue. These people are boring naive and wrong. All you need to do is pick a side and then be a cheerleader or used car salesman for that side. They might try to point out that putting out one-sided propaganda is what Hitler did. They may also try to tell you that teaching our kids the persuasive essays format that only looks at supporting evidence is poisoning the future by creating little propagandist. That would be true if we didn't know that our side was right. And sure foreign people will tell you about confirmation bias and cognitive inertia and former cult leaders will tell you how easy it is to lie to yourself. And scientists that study bias will tell you that it's almost impossible to remove bias and see the world clearly. and that might be important for other people to learn but what we need to do is win. We just need to put out more and better propaganda than the other side. That's what I hear.

Linking pro/chin evidence to conclusions, creating order, fixing our reasoning, making reason, and fixing our broken world

Unity 2020, a process party