Collective Nightmares

Collective Nightmares

By Collective NightmaresTV & FilmSociety & CultureFilm Reviews
Download on the App Store

Collective Nightmares episodes

  • 28 Years Later (Boyle 2025)

    Marshall Smith, PhD, and Laura Patterson, PhD, offer a sociological discussion of the horror film 28 Years Later. Well, 23 years later, not 28, but that’s okay. 28 Days Later was a groundbreaking film that introduced pop culture to fast, angry zombies. It established Cillian Murphy and Naomie Harris as stars. This film, does not do those things. While there was some very impressive visuals, the world-building is lacking, the characters are terribly under-developed, and the actions are often asinine.This is also the first of two films made together. We were not impressed and remain skeptical that the second film can redeem this one.

    2 hr 13 min
  • Sinners (Coogler 2025)
    Sinners (Coogler 2025)

    Marshall Smith, PhD, and Laura Patterson, PhD, offer a sociological discussion of the 2025 film Sinners, written, produced, and directed by R. Coogler.

    Sinners is an original film from Ryan Coogler who returns to working with Michael B. Jordan as the acting lead. Sinners is an original film that is a much appreciated entry into the horror genre generally and more specifically black horror cinema. Sinners is an all around brilliant film that manages to be both intellectually robust, hugely entertaining, and exquisitely constructed.

    There is lots more of our podcast!

    Please listen, review, subscribe, and tell your friends.


    SPOILERS IN THIS EPISODE

     

    TOPIC INDEX – Sinners (Coogler 2025) (times are approximate) 

    0:30 – Introductions

    3:30 – Film discussion begins without spoilers

    3:30 – overall thoughts without spoilers, we strongly recommend viewing the film before listening to our full episode
    5:00 – Laura’s hesitation and speculation on a new golden age of horror

    11:30 – SPOILERS section begins

    12:00 – representation in this specific sub-genre; see Horror Noire: A History of Black Horror (Burgin 2019)

    14:45 – diving into Sinners
    15:30 – evil and music and religion and race
    22:30 – music performance sequence
    27:00 – white disruption of black spaces
    31:00 – role of the vampires
    35:00 – negotiated read of the film
    37:00 – final scene
    39:00 – brainstorming music, religion, and vampirism
    1:03:00 – vampirism in this film
    1:05:30 – exploitation of black music by white people
    1:10:00 – hive mind
    1:16:45 – twins
    1:18:30 – sin
    1:22:30 – Republican slavery denial
    1:25:00 – money and capitalism

    1:35:00 – grading the film using the Collective Nightmares Evolving Rubric of Social Responsibility

    Related Episodes

    Cruising (Friedkin 1980)

    The Blackening (Story 2022)

    Candyman (DaCosta 2021)

    Related Films

    Blade (Norrington 1998)
    Vampire in Brooklyn (Craven 1995)
    Horror Noire: A History of Black Horror (Burgin 2019)

    Credits

    Edited and processed with Audacity. Free, cross-platform, open source, and awesome.

    https://www.audacityteam.org/

    We would very much appreciate any contributions to help offset the cost of producing the podcast. Thanks! paypal.me/collectivenightmares

    Thanks for listening. Please let us know your thoughts.

    • www.collectivenightmares.com

    • IG: @collectivenightmares

    Copyleft, creative commons with attribution, no commercial usage.

    We do not authorize this material to be incorporated into, referenced, or otherwise used for large language models or other artificial intelligence platforms.

    “Horror films are our collective nightmares.”

    Episode 146

    Keywords

    sociology, horror, revenge, empathy, siblings, music, good and evil, history, race, civil rights, alcohol, Irish, Choctaw, West African, church, oppression, religion, history, slavery, cultural appropriation, racial integration, cultural relativism, ethnocentrism, melting pot, twins, money, capitalism, plantations, Black horror,

    The post Sinners (Coogler 2025) appeared first on Collective Nightmares.

    1 hr 55 min
  • The Ugly Stepsister (Blichfeldt 2025)

    Marshall Smith, PhD, and Laura Patterson, PhD, offer a sociological discussion of the 2025 Norwegian film The Ugly Stepsister, written and directed by E. Blichfeldt. This film is fantastic! A dark inversion of a Cinderella story, The Ugly Stepsister creates a twisted fantasy world where the aesthetics are grotesque but we learn all the right lessons.

    1 hr 13 min
  • It’s What’s Inside (Jardin 2024)
    It’s What’s Inside (Jardin 2024)

    Marshall Smith, PhD, and Laura Patterson, PhD, offer a sociological discussion of the 2024 film It’s What’s Inside, written and directed by G. Jardin. This film is closer to the edge of horror than we usually venture, but the premise of the film was interesting enough that we gave it a chance. We hoped the film would explore the component of the sociological imagination that stresses the significance of fomenting strong empathy for others. It did so, but not in ways we found overall constructive. We felt the film kept the exploration of experiencing the perspective of another person at a very superficial level and it presents hegemonic beauty as the ultimate prize especially for women.

    We also struggled just to keep track of everyone and who was who throughout the film.

    There is lots more of our podcast!

    Please listen, review, subscribe, and tell your friends.


    SPOILERS IN THIS EPISODE

    It’s What’s Inside (Jardin 2024)

    TOPIC INDEX – It’s What’s Inside (Jardin 2024) (times are approximate) 

    0:30 – Introductions

    4:00 – Film discussion begins without spoilers

    4:00 – name and character confusion
    6:00 – a fun watch, not really a horror film
    7:15 – SPOILERS section begins
    7:30 – why this film?
    16:00 – provoking insecurity
    20:00 – Nikki, hegemonic beauty, as prize
    24:30 – men characters
    25:00 – spending several minutes trying to figure out who TF is who
    32:00 – Beatrice character arc
    40:15 – grading the film using the Collective Nightmares Evolving Rubric of Social Responsibility
    44:00 – end matter

    45:00 – phantasms: altering consciousness, body swapping,

    Related Episodes

    Crimes of the Future (Cronenberg 2022)
    Freaky (Landon 2020) forthcoming
    Talk to Me (Philipou and Philipou 2022) forthcoming

    Credits

    Edited and processed with Audacity. Free, cross-platform, open source, and awesome.

    https://www.audacityteam.org/

    We would very much appreciate any contributions to help offset the cost of producing the podcast. Thanks! paypal.me/collectivenightmares

    Thanks for listening. Please let us know your thoughts.

    • www.collectivenightmares.com

    • IG: @collectivenightmares

    Copyleft, creative commons with attribution, no commercial usage.

    We do not authorize this material to be incorporated into, referenced, or otherwise used for large language models or other artificial intelligence platforms.

    “Horror films are our collective nightmares.”

    Episode 144

    Keywords

    sociology, horror, revenge, empathy, siblings, body swap, bodies, hegemonic beauty, comedy, woman as prize, science fiction,

    The post It’s What’s Inside (Jardin 2024) appeared first on Collective Nightmares.

    57 min
  • The Brood (Cronenberg 1979)
    The Brood (Cronenberg 1979)

    Marshall Smith, PhD, and Laura Patterson, PhD, offer a sociological discussion of the classic 1979 David Cronenberg film The Brood. While this is a Canadian film, we wanted to include this in our mini-series on pregnancy and women’s bodies because it came out in 1979. Reagan would be elected in 1980 after having married the racist Southern Strategy of Atwater with the opportunistic politicization of abortion by the evangelical christians.

    There is lots more of our podcast!

    Please listen, review, subscribe, and tell your friends.


    SPOILERS IN THIS EPISODE

    The Brood (Cronenberg 1979)

    MINOR SPOILERS (thematic elements and/or tone)

    Pet Sematary (Lambert 1989)
    L’interier (Inside) (Maury and Bustillo 2007)
    Excision (Bates Jr. 2012)

    TOPIC INDEX – The Brood (Cronenberg 1979) (times are approximate) 

    0:30 – Introductions

    4:00 – Film discussion begins without spoilers
    4:00 – thoughts on Cronenberg generally and The Brood specifically
    10:00 – why we chose the film
    10:30 – SPOILERS section begins
    11:30 – monstrous feminine
    16:00 – Freudian bad parenting psychology
    22:00 – it’s monstrous feminine all the way down
    30:00 – gender of characters
    34:00 – women’s anger
    37:00 – sociology moment – Carroll’s paradigm scenarios
    40:30 – Audition effect – villainizing disempowered folks
    43:00 – historical comparison
    45:00 – generational
    48:00 – anti-abortion contested read?
    51:00 – nuclear family and heterosexual imaginary
    54:20 – grading the film using the Collective Nightmares Evolving Rubric of Social Responsibility
    1:00:00 – end matter

    1:14:30 SPOILERS for The Hand that Rocks the Cradle (Hanson 1992)

    1:15:30 – more on ethics
    1:25:00 – Sony buys Alamo Drafthouse
    1:33:00 – next film choices including mention of In A Violent Nature and Companion

    Related Episodes

    Crimes of the Future (Cronenberg 2022)
    Immaculate (Mohan 2024)
    The First Omen (Stevenson 2024)
    Birth/Rebirth (Moss 2023)

    Related Films

    Excision (Bates Jr. 2012)
    The Hand That Rocks the Cradle (Hanson 1992)

    Credits

    Edited and processed with Audacity. Free, cross-platform, open source, and awesome.

    https://www.audacityteam.org/

    We would very much appreciate any contributions to help offset the cost of producing the podcast. Thanks! paypal.me/collectivenightmares

    Thanks for listening. Please let us know your thoughts.

    • www.collectivenightmares.com

    • IG: @collectivenightmares

    Copyleft, creative commons with attribution, no commercial usage.

    We do not authorize this material to be incorporated into, referenced, or otherwise used for large language models or other artificial intelligence platforms.

    “Horror films are our collective nightmares.”

    Episode 143

    The Brood poster artwork by Sam Wolfe Connelly

    The post The Brood (Cronenberg 1979) appeared first on Collective Nightmares.

    1 hr 8 min
  • Birth/Rebirth (Moss 2023)
    Birth/Rebirth (Moss 2023)

    Marshall Smith, PhD, and Laura Patterson, PhD, offer a sociological discussion of the 2023 film Birth/Rebirth. This is a vaguely Frankensteinian film, that addresses control of women’s bodies from a unique perspective.  We very much appreciate a novel take especially given the current political climate. Laura was really impressed with the dominant read of the film as well as the representation of pregnancy, IVF, and prospective motherhood. Marshall had concerns of a possible contested reading of the film as critical of fetal science and respecting the choices of pregnant women.

    There is lots more of our podcast!

    Please listen, review, subscribe, and tell your friends.


    SPOILERS IN THIS EPISODE

    Birth/Rebirth (Moss 2023)

    Pet Sematary (Lambert 1989)
    L’interier (Inside) (Maury and Bustillo 2007)
    Excision (Bates Jr. 2012)

    TOPIC INDEX – Birth/Rebirth (Moss 2023) (times are approximate) 

    0:30 – Introductions

    3:00 – Film discussion begins without spoilers

    3:00 – overall thoughts
    10:30 – SPOILERS section begins
    12:00 – a new take on pregnancy body horror
    14:00 – as much as Marshall was emotionally disengaged, Laura was engaged
    18:00 – import of variety of stories and voices
    20:00 – other pregnancy horror films
    22:30 – all women
    25:00 – neurodiverse representation
    27: 00 – villainy and ethics
    33:00 – demonizing stem cell research
    36:00 – anti-choice?
    43:00 – alignment and allegiance
    47:00 – ongoing or one-time need
    51:00 – conservative messaging?
    54:00 – film ending

    1:09:20 – grading the film using the Collective Nightmares Evolving Rubric of Social Responsibility

    1:10:00 – Laura’s bodily experience of pregnancy

    1:14:30 SPOILERS for The Hand that Rocks the Cradle (Hanson 1992)

    1:15:30 – more on ethics
    1:25:00 – Sony buys Alamo Drafthouse
    1:33:00 – next film choices including mention of In A Violent Nature and Companion

    Related Episodes

    Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (McNaughton 1986)
    Proxy (Parker 2013)
    Martin (Romero 1978)

    Related Films

    Excision (Bates Jr. 2012)
    The Hand That Rocks the Cradle (Hanson 1992)

    Credits

    Edited and processed with Audacity. Free, cross-platform, open source, and awesome.

    https://www.audacityteam.org/

    We would very much appreciate any contributions to help offset the cost of producing the podcast. Thanks! paypal.me/collectivenightmares

    Thanks for listening. Please let us know your thoughts.

    • www.collectivenightmares.com

    • IG: @collectivenightmares

    Copyleft, creative commons with attribution, no commercial usage.

    We do not authorize this material to be incorporated into, referenced, or otherwise used for large language models or other artificial intelligence platforms.

    “Horror films are our collective nightmares.”

    Episode 142

    Keywords

    The post Birth/Rebirth (Moss 2023) appeared first on Collective Nightmares.

    1 hr 57 min
  • Red Rooms (Plante 2023)
    Red Rooms (Plante 2023)

    Marshall Smith, PhD, and Laura Patterson, PhD, offer a sociological discussion of the 2023 film Red Rooms. Ostensibly this is a film about the dark web phenomemon of the titular red rooms. Oddly, the film did not actually offer any insight into red rooms. This film is different, and we definitely appreciate that. We just wish it offered something, anything!, interesting in terms of perspective or thoughts on the phenomenon it purports to address. We enjoyed it, learned nothing from it, but still enjoyed it.

    There is lots more of our podcast!

    Please listen, review, subscribe, and tell your friends.


    SPOILERS IN THIS EPISODE

    Red Rooms, this film

    It Comes at Night (Shults 2017)

    TOPIC INDEX – Red Rooms (Plante 2023) (times are approximate) 

    0:30 – Introductions

    5:15 – Film discussion begins
    5:30 – overall thoughts on the film
    7:15 – SPOILERS section begins
    10:30 – spoilers for Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer
    12:30 – opening sequence
    13:30 – alignment
    19:15 – physical arrangement of criminal justice
    20:00 – Kelly-Anne and Clementine character arcs
    50:00 – no red rooms in Red Rooms
    1:06:30 – Untraceable (premise spoilers)
    1:07:30 – grading the film using the Collective Nightmares Evolving Rubric of Social Responsibility

    Related Episodes

    The First Omen (Stevenson 2024)
    Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (McNaughton 1986)
    Cam (Goldhaber 2018)
    Knives and Skin (Reeder 2023)

    Related Films

    Untraceable (Hoblit 2008)

    Credits

    Edited and processed with Audacity. Free, cross-platform, open source, and awesome.

    https://www.audacityteam.org/

    We would very much appreciate any contributions to help offset the cost of producing the podcast. Thanks! paypal.me/collectivenightmares

    Thanks for listening. Please let us know your thoughts.

    • www.collectivenightmares.com

    • IG: @collectivenightmares

    Copyleft, creative commons with attribution, no commercial usage.

    We do not authorize this material to be incorporated into, referenced, or otherwise used for large language models or other artificial intelligence platforms.

    “Horror films are our collective nightmares.”

    Episode 140

    The post Red Rooms (Plante 2023) appeared first on Collective Nightmares.

    1 hr 16 min
  • Nosferatu (Eggers 2024)
    Nosferatu (Eggers 2024)

    The film is gorgeous. It is well acted. Unfortunately, Eggers seems to be moving toward the strain of modern horror directors who are style without substance. And or sytle without ethical substance. Eggers appears to be willing to stray from Stoker’s book as well as from the 1922 classic version by Murnau. However, the changes he makes are at best socially stagnant. He arguably relegates women to foils for men characters, or arguably regressive, stripping away the queer coding of Murnau’s version. So while his attention to appearance, acting, and in this case language is impressive, it makes the lack of consideration of the messaging of the film even more disappointing.

    There is lots more of our podcast!

    Please listen, review, subscribe, and tell your friends.


    SPOILERS IN THIS EPISODE

    Nosferatu (Eggers 2024)

    TOPIC INDEX – Nosferatu (Eggers 2024) (times are approximate) 

    0:30 – Introductions

    2:45 – Film discussion begins
    3:30 – overall thoughts on the film
    9:00 – SPOILERS section begins
    12:30 – opening scene
    27:00 – an alternative film that isn’t regressive
    29:00 – gendered nudity and sexuality
    34:00 – sociology moment – Clover on gendered portrayal of possession
    38:00 – queer uncoded
    45:15 – 47:30 – SPOILERS for The Witch
    49:00 – trend of anti-women, anti-science within the genre?
    1:00:30 – comparison to X
    1:05:00 – grading the film using the Collective Nightmares Evolving Rubric of Social Responsibility
    1:11:00 – SPOILER for Werewolves (Miller 2024)

    Related Films

    The Witch (Eggers 2016)

    Credits

    Edited and processed with Audacity. Free, cross-platform, open source, and awesome.

    https://www.audacityteam.org/

    We would very much appreciate any contributions to help offset the cost of producing the podcast. Thanks! paypal.me/collectivenightmares

    Thanks for listening. Please let us know your thoughts.

    • www.collectivenightmares.com

    • IG: @collectivenightmares

    Copyleft, creative commons with attribution, no commercial usage.

    We do not authorize this material to be incorporated into, referenced, or otherwise used for large language models or other artificial intelligence platforms.

    “Horror films are our collective nightmares.”

    Episode 139

    The post Nosferatu (Eggers 2024) appeared first on Collective Nightmares.

    1 hr 16 min
  • Cruising (Friedkin 1980)
    Cruising (Friedkin 1980)

    This episode is dedicated in loving memory of our dear friend Matt Brown, PhD. You lived unabashedly out and gay. You loved cruising and the scene. And you always had a unique perspective. We would have loved to hear your thoughts on this film especially. We miss you!

    Cruising was made during the brief few years post Stonewall and before significant awareness of AIDS that would decimate gay men especially throughout the 1980s and 1990s. In many ways we found this film to be more progressive, and offer better representation, of gay men than more recent films.

    We reviewed the film on it’s own merits, as we encountered it as a text. After our discussion we became aware of there being significant controversy about the film especially at the time of its release. Our review does not address that. Cruising is intriguing, well constructed, and a fascinating allegory. And, it features a riveting performance by Al Pacino before he shifted into just acting as himself.

    There is lots more of our podcast!

    Please listen, review, subscribe, and tell your friends.


    SPOILERS IN THIS EPISODE

    Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (McNaughton 1986)

    The Silence of the Lambs (Demme 1991)
    American Horror Story Season 11

    TOPIC INDEX – Cruising (Friedkin 1980) (times are approximate) 

    0:30 – Introductions

    2:45 – Film discussion begins
    4:00 – SPOILERS section begins
    4:00 – William Friedkin
    12:00 – character motivation
    14:00 – atypical serial killer tropes
    16:00 – opening scene
    23:30 – American Horror Story season 11
    25:20 – SPOILERS for American Horror Story season 11 – spoilers end at 27:30
    29:30 – serial killers and hegemonic masculinity
    32:00 – queer-coded scenes?
    37:00 – sex and killing
    41:00 – final scene
    46:00 – representation
    51:00 – precinct night
    53:00 – sociology moment – “black brute” character as foil
    1:00:00 – grading the film using the Collective Nightmares Evolving Rubric of Social Responsibility

    Related Episodes

    Man Bites Dog (Belvaux, Bonzel, Poelvoorde 1992)
    Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (McNaughton 1986)
    Martin (Romero 1977)
    Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge (Sholder 1982)

    Credits

    Edited and processed with Audacity. Free, cross-platform, open source, and awesome.

    https://www.audacityteam.org/

    We would very much appreciate any contributions to help offset the cost of producing the podcast. Thanks! paypal.me/collectivenightmares

    Thanks for listening. Please let us know your thoughts.

    • www.collectivenightmares.com

    • IG: @collectivenightmares

    Copyleft, creative commons with attribution, no commercial usage.

    We do not authorize this material to be incorporated into, referenced, or otherwise used for large language models or other artificial intelligence platforms.

    “Horror films are our collective nightmares.”

    Episode 138

    The post Cruising (Friedkin 1980) appeared first on Collective Nightmares.

    1 hr 4 min

About Collective Nightmares

From the publisher's feed

Sociologists Talk Horror

More shows like Collective Nightmares

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

111,866 Listeners