There is a recent report by Menlo Ventures, 2025: The State of Consumer AI, stating that, "More than half of American adults (61%) have used AI in the past six months, and nearly one in five rely on it every day. Scaled globally, that translates to 1.7-1.8 billion people who have used AI tools, with 500-600 million engaging daily. This is no longer experimentation; it's habit formation at an unprecedented scale. When we do the math, 1.8 billion users at an average monthly subscription cost of $20 per month equals $432 billion a year; $12 billion market indicates that only about 3% pay for premium services - a strikingly low conversion rate and one of the largest and fastest-emerging monetization gaps in recent consumer tech history. Even ChatGPT, with its first-mover advantage, only converts about 5% of its weekly active users into paying subscribers. This gap between usage and payment represents a major opportunity."

David Stephen, who does research in conceptual Brain Science explores innovation for Consumer AI profitability

The problem for consumer AI companies is simply not for the lack of need but for the absence of - products and services - branching. What are people already paying for that they would be willing to pay extra for, given valuable AI features?

Computing for Consumer AI Profitability

What are people not paying for that they would be willing to pay for, because it augments their abilities with AI, in a way that is not simply AI agentic usage? What are people using AI for that they have found that comes with risks that they would be willing to pay for [safety] to mitigate those risks?

News in Two Languages

News publishers are seeking more digital subscriptions amid lower traffic from major search engines because of AI summaries. What else can be added to news [as a service] to make people pay more? Language. All news can be displayed in at least 2 languages: side-by-side, line-by-line, paragraph-by-paragraph. The purpose of this will be to build familiarity with the other language. By seeing sentences, words and so on, in another language, regularly, without the burden of memorization, it can become easier to learn the other language, and maintain a mental consistency in sustaining what is learned. There would be learning resources for the rudiments of the language, but it would be easier for languages with similar alphabets. For those with different alphabets, prior lessons would be necessary.

The objective will be to have dynamic and sustained continuity even when there is no one to speak - or practice - with, to solidify the knowledge. A platform can be developed. News publishers can own accounts on it. Then translations are provided for their contents, based on subscriptions and they get something more. They may also host the API on their websites and apps, to have their subscribers there have access. News is not information to memorize. Combining another language would boost cognition across ages, ensure AI is inducing better neuroplasticity for humans and providing new value for mind, not just a utility providing some answers in dissociation - without learning. It may also be useful to source news at certain destinations, with happenings but with only one news edition. It may shape how loved ones from afar get informed. News is what people are paying for already that they would be willing to pay more for, with an extra AI service for language.

AI Pen beyond AI Wearable or AI Pin or AI Sound Device

What would be the next biggest AI device that would scale and be pervasive would not be an AI wearable or some AI sound device. It would be a pen that would fascinate users. Most humans write with their dominant hands, because of concepts in brain science called laterality and handedness. Simply, one hand delivers more coordination and stability than the other. So, most pens - including digital pens - are built to work with the dominant hand since balance and coordination are not an issue. However, what if a...