Register to be part of future conversations in real time hereOr schedule a time to talk directly to our team here

 

Key Highlights

• Opinion vs. perspective defined: Opinions are immediate reactions grounded in feelings and bias that often shut down conversations; perspectives are broader views based on data that raise questions and open up thinking
• When opinions are appropriate: Three situations call for direct opinions - time-sensitive decisions, when someone explicitly asks for your judgment, and very high-stakes scenarios where deliberation isn't feasible
• Four question frameworks for offering perspective: "What lens are we using?", "If we thought of this as an X problem instead of Y, how would we approach it?", "What would [person/role] say that we're not seeing?", and "What are we optimizing for?"
• Acknowledge your bias to counter it: Either admit your bias upfront and ask others for different perspectives, or actively seek people with different biases and ask "What would be true if I abandoned my bias?"
• Perspectives early, opinions at decision time: When you have the benefit of time, gather perspectives through questions; when it's "go time" and a decision must be made, that's when opinions are needed

Notable Quotes

• "An opinion is your immediate reaction, grounded in feelings and bias. A perspective is a broader view based on data that raises more questions than answers."
• "Opinions often shut down conversations, especially if you're a leader. If you have a really strong opinion, everyone goes 'well, I'm not going to bother to weigh in.'"
• "When you have the beauty of time, let's get perspectives. If it's go time - high stakes, decision needed - that's where opinions come in."
• "Before you assert an opinion, ask yourself: What am I assuming here? The problem may be misidentified."
• "If you always offer opinions, your team gets lazy - they just wait for you to give the answer. If you offer perspectives, they learn to understand trade-offs and ask better questions."

Featured Speakers

• Dr. Suzanne Peterson is a Partner at CRA | Admired Leadership with over 25 years of experience coaching Fortune 500 executives. Known for helping leaders shift from "here's what I think" to "here's what you might not be seeing," she specializes in expanding how leaders see their challenges and opportunities. Her work focuses on high-performance coaching with teams already operating at top levels who want to get 10-20% better.
• Wes Bender serves as a facilitator and thought leadership coordinator at CRA | Admired Leadership, helping to connect practical leadership insights with real-world application through webinars and educational content. A proud Tennessee Volunteers fan navigating parenting teenagers.

Resources Mentioned

• Field Note: "Leaders Give Perspective More Than They Give Opinions"

 

Register to be part of future conversations in real time hereOr schedule a time to talk directly to our team here

 

Key Highlights

• The praise-stingy paradox: Leaders with extremely high standards tend to withhold feedback because excellence is simply expected - but this silence causes people to presume negative, making regular feedback essential even for high performers
• The 2x2 feedback framework: Effective feedback balances valence (how it's received - positive or negative) with utility (how actionable it is), aiming for the "Holy Grail" of positive reception with high usefulness while avoiding the "insult bucket"
• Be specific when seeking feedback: Never ask "Give me some feedback" - instead, identify one specific area you're working on and ask people who see you in action to tell you when they observe you doing it well or poorly
• Leading without domain expertise: When leading people whose expertise exceeds your own, focus on developmental experiences, removing roadblocks, and creating high-performing team dynamics rather than trying to match their technical knowledge
• The 1-10 framework for actionable feedback: Ask "On a scale of 1-10, how am I doing as your [role]?" then follow with "What one thing could I do to get from a [X] to a [X+1]?" to generate specific, actionable insights

Notable Quotes

• "Leaders who demand the best from others tend to be praise stingy because that desire for excellence is so high. But when they do give feedback, it lands with real power and meaning."
• "The Holy Grail is feedback that's received in a positive way and also has usefulness - it's actionable, I can do something with it in the future."
• "How you do anything is how you do everything. If you have blind spots at work, they're likely showing up at home or in the community too."
• "Leadership is a contact sport. There is feedback all around you if you're open to it - in how people react to your presentations, in the questions they ask, in their behavior."
• "The best teams are more player-led than leader-led. Your job isn't to know their role better than they do - it's to create clarity around goals, remove obstacles, and point to the North Star."

Featured Speakers

• John Cook is a Partner & Executive Coach at CRA | Admired Leadership, specializing in executive coaching and leadership development. A father of four and avid fly fisherman, he works extensively with C-suite leaders while also developing emerging coaches within the firm. Known for his constant pursuit of feedback and commitment to continuous improvement, he brings practical frameworks for talent development and team performance.
• Wes Bender serves as a facilitator and thought leadership coordinator at CRA | Admired Leadership, helping to connect practical leadership insights with real-world application through webinars and educational content. A proud Tennessee Volunteers fan from Knoxville.

Resources Mentioned

• Field Note: "In the Absence of Feedback, the Most Experienced People Presume the Negative" (inspired by Pat Summitt)

Register to be part of future conversations in real time hereOr schedule a time to talk directly to our team here

 

Key Highlights

• Reframe speed vs. quality: Leadership strength isn't about making fast decisions - it's about making quality decisions informed by the right people, aligned with values, and considering second-order consequences
• ASAP vs. ALAP framework: Distinguish between decisions that must be made "as soon as possible" (low consequences or time-sensitive) versus "as late as possible" (complex decisions where maintaining optionality reveals better options over time)
• The dangers of binary thinking: Black-and-white decision-making leads to missing facts, flip-flopping on decisions later, and ignoring your own judgment in favor of perceived group wisdom
• Train yourself to ask questions first: Instead of immediately answering "yes" or "no" to requests, develop the habit of responding with questions like "What needs to be true for this to happen?" to create space for better thinking
• Ladder of autonomy for teams: Help staff understand when to seek input (political decisions, precedent-setting, budget thresholds) versus when they have autonomy to act, preventing the "checkbox mentality" while ensuring quality decisions

Notable Quotes

• "We confuse strength of leadership with decisiveness, and really decisiveness meaning speed of decision-making. We think we need to know the right answer and say it quickly, and if we can't, it makes us look weak."
• "When people say 'I don't have time to think in the gray,' my reaction is you don't have time not to, because you're going to end up going back on decisions you made."
• "Train yourself to never answer a definitive question at the beginning, and start asking questions. If somebody says 'Do you think we should do this?' do not say yes or no."
• "Quality decisions often come down to: Have you gotten the right people to weigh in on it? Options will reveal themselves over time if you're not trying to be fast and decisive."
• "Values-driven leaders are often the most admired leaders. Spend time thinking about how you can be a values-driven leader too."

Featured Speakers

• Carolynne Thomas is a Partner & Executive Coach at CRA | Admired Leadership, known for her expertise in organizational culture transformation and strategic decision-making. With extensive experience helping leadership teams articulate and implement cultural change, she exemplifies the ability to operate in gray areas while maintaining clarity on values and outcomes. Her work focuses on creating experiences that help leaders and teams align around shared objectives.
• Wes Bender serves as a facilitator and thought leadership coordinator at CRA | Admired Leadership, helping to connect practical leadership insights with real-world application through webinars and educational content.

Resources Mentioned

• Field Note: "On Thinking Gray"

Register to be part of future conversations in real time hereOr schedule a time to talk directly to our team here

 

Key Highlights

• Common goals vs. common ground: While we naturally gravitate toward people who share our interests or backgrounds, focusing on what we're building together creates stronger, more sustainable relationships than waiting for personality clicks
• Effort matters more than ease: The relationships that required the most work to build often become the deepest and most trusted - don't assume that natural or easy connections are automatically better
• Incremental trust building: When relationships are damaged, create small, shared goals with quick wins rather than attempting one big conversation - trust builds through repeated small promises kept, not dramatic gestures
• Organizational impact of leader relationships: When leaders have tension, it forces team members to pick sides and creates psychological unsafety - people have to watch what they say and consider political repercussions
• Building collaboration muscles: Start with deliberately created shared projects, even if they're not mandated from above, to develop habits of communication and accountability that transfer to future collaborations

Notable Quotes

• "If you focus less on commonality and more on common goals - what are we building that we can share together - that ends up actually unifying us more over time than waiting for some magical click to happen."
• "Effort matters, and that's actually completely controllable, because we can control the amount of effort we put into a relationship. It doesn't have to be this mystical personality match."
• "Trust happens incrementally. Trust doesn't happen in big, dramatic swoops - it's small, incremental promises that were made, kept, and followed through."
• "When leaders have tension, we're subtly telling people around us that you gotta pick a side. That makes people feel less safe because now they have to watch what they say."
• "Just by the fact of signing up to say 'I'm committing to doing this, it's not natural, it's not easy, but I'm committing' - that's what actually makes the relationship start gelling together."

Featured Speakers

• Diana Hong is a Partner & Executive Coach at CRA | Admired Leadership, specializing in organizational change and relationship dynamics. With extensive experience coaching senior leaders through complex interpersonal challenges, she brings practical insights on building trust and collaboration in high-stakes environments. Her approach emphasizes actionable strategies over theoretical frameworks.
• Wes Bender serves as a facilitator and thought leadership coordinator at CRA | Admired Leadership, helping to connect practical leadership insights with real-world application through webinars and educational content.

Resources Mentioned

• Field Note on finding common ground vs. common goals

 

Register to be part of future conversations in real time hereOr schedule a time to talk directly to our team here

 

Key Highlights

• The Clarity Index reveals five essential topics for regular communication: strategy, culture, functional strategy, role clarity, and employee value proposition (why work here vs. elsewhere) - lack of clarity in these areas directly impacts engagement and decision-making speed
• Connect everything back to strategy: Don't just communicate strategy once in January - every decision, change, or new initiative should be explicitly connected back to your organizational strategy throughout the year
• Cultural clarity requires specificity: Values like "excellence" or "trust" are meaningless without behavioral examples - use promotions, hiring decisions, and daily interactions to demonstrate what these values actually look like in practice
• Conditions of accountability drive clarity: Set clear expectations (format, detail level, deadlines), provide proper resources (templates, examples of excellence), give appropriate autonomy, and define positive/negative consequences
• Tailor detail to audience: With senior leaders, be brief, brilliant, and be gone - they'll ask for more if needed. With teams, mix formats using pre-reads, focused meetings, and detailed follow-ups rather than cramming everything into one communication

Notable Quotes

• "Message sent is rarely message received. People are looking at your actions, decisions, and interactions to see what's really true."
• "When senior leaders want three things from you: be brief, be brilliant, and be gone. If they want more detail, they'll ask."
• "Your strategy can only be clear if there aren't detractors from it. You have to proactively look for where skeptics will roll their eyes."
• "Do a little bit more work up front to create clarity for better results the first time, rather than going back and forth on details later."
• "Before important communications, ask yourself: What is the one thing I want people to take away from this?"
• "Culture itself is intangible - we have to tie cultural values into things we're already communicating about, like promotions and daily interactions."

Featured Speakers

• Sierra Holland is a Managing Director in CRA | Admired Leadership's Strategic Communications practice, specializing in helping leaders become better communicators for their teams. With expertise in organizational communication strategy and the proprietary Clarity Index research, she focuses on creating communication experiences that drive engagement and decision-making effectiveness. Known for her sharp facilitation skills and curiosity-driven approach to client work.
• Wes Bender serves as a facilitator and thought leadership coordinator at CRA | Admired Leadership, helping to connect practical leadership insights with real-world application through webinars and educational content.

Resources Mentioned

• Field Note - The Signs a Team is Waiting for a Decision or Strategy

Register to be part of future conversations in real time hereOr schedule a time to talk directly to our team here

 

Key Highlights

• Values vs. virtues distinction: Values should be specific, actionable, and behavioral (like "I include every voice in meetings") rather than abstract virtues (like "inclusion") that don't provide clear guidance for decision-making
• The admiration approach: Instead of asking "What are your values?" ask "Who do you admire and what specifically do you admire about them?" This cuts through the noise of aspirational lists and reveals authentic priorities
• Focus on attributes, not whole persons: Rather than putting leaders on pedestals, identify specific behaviors or qualities you admire - collecting "points of reference" from multiple people to build your own leadership approach
• Making values actionable: Test your values by examining where they show up in daily decisions - who you hire, how you spend time, what you fund, how you give feedback, and who gets airtime in meetings
• Organizational vs. individual values: In team settings, use inclusive language ("What do we value?") and let organizational strategy be the equalizer when individual values conflict

Notable Quotes

• "Values should be specific and actionable and behavioral. Virtues are sort of that aspirational list of descriptors, but what we want to strive for are practical manifestations that show up in how we lead day-to-day."
• "It's really hard to put that lens on yourself and say, here's everything that I value. But a great indicator is discerning what people value or admire in others as a starting point."
• "I think about it as collecting points of reference. Pretty much everybody's got something you can admire - not a person as much as pieces and parts of lots of people."
• "The great equalizer is the organizational vision and strategy. When values are in tension, the question shouldn't be personal preference as much as what does the organization need."
• "If I've said this is important to me, would somebody else be able to observe that and say, yeah, that's important to you?"

Featured Speakers

• Ben Stringfellow is an Executive Coach and Partner at CRA | Admired Leadership, known for his expertise in organizational communication and strategic leadership development. Despite being one of the firm's busiest members, he's recognized for always making time to support colleagues and clients with thoughtful guidance and practical insights.
• Mallory Stacey is an Executive Coach at CRA | Admired Leadership, filling in as host for this session. She brings expertise in leadership coaching and team development, with a focus on helping leaders translate abstract concepts into actionable behaviors.

Resources Mentioned

• Field Note: Your Admiration for Others Reveals Your Core Values

Register to be part of future conversations in real time hereOr schedule a time to talk directly to our team here

 

Key Highlights

• Two contrasting leadership stories: One showing how a senior admiral responded with grace when David made a career-threatening mistake with VHS tapes during a high-stakes presentation, and another where David's own reactive response to a difficult colleague cost him $50,000 in bonus and a promotion opportunity
• Moving beyond conventional wisdom: Traditional advice like "count to 10" treats symptoms rather than root causes - the best leaders develop consistent behaviors that create natural space between triggers and responses
• The power of inquiry over immediate answers: Develop the habit of asking 1-3 questions before responding, using phrases like "Tell me more about that" or "Say more about why you're feeling that way" to create thinking space
• Throwing problems back strategically: When someone brings you an emotionally charged issue, ask them for more context about how and why they feel that way - this gives you time to reflect while helping them process their emotions
• Judicious shows of emotion can be motivational: Sometimes a look or controlled display of frustration can be effective feedback, but only when built on a foundation of clear expectations and strong relationships

Notable Quotes

• "Leadership is what you do. It's how people react to you that's most important. Everybody else that engages with us is grading our papers based on our engagement."
• "Our goal isn't really to eliminate our emotional reactions because we are first human beings. What we want to do is develop consistent behaviors that create a space between the trigger and the response."
• "What we're not trying to do is automatically equal an answer in the immediate. What we're trying to do is become an excellent problem solver."
• "You owe them a response, not necessarily an answer to their question. Think about the difference in the frame with those two."
• "If you respond smartly, you can diffuse or derail a negative situation versus reacting immediately and viscerally and creating a kerfuffle."

Resources Mentioned

• Field Note: "Learn to Respond Instead of React"

Register to be part of future conversations in real time hereOr schedule a time to talk directly to our team here Key Highlights

• Leadership resides in behavior, not personality: Excellence in any domain comes from what you do, not who you are - leadership is a composite of choices, routines, and actions rather than innate traits or psychological dispositions
• Self-assessments can create self-limiting beliefs: Tools like Myers-Briggs, DISC, and others risk becoming excuses for behavior rather than catalysts for growth, leading people to say "this is just who I am" instead of "who do I want to become?"
• Focus on commonalities over differences: Great teams function because of what they share - values, standards, expectations - rather than constantly highlighting how members are different from each other
• Better alternatives for building awareness: Use direct feedback, smart questions, and honest conversations rather than formal assessments - ask "What's it like to be on the receiving end of me?" or "How do I get to the next number on a 1-10 scale?"
• The Venn diagram approach to development: Focus where two circles intersect - things you're not good at AND things others need you to be great at, discovered through conversation rather than assessment

Notable Quotes

• "Leadership resides in behavior. Who you are as a leader is a composite, a stained glass window of lots of things that you do or don't do."
• "I'm much more interested in teams about what we have in common than what we have in difference. Great teams don't function because they all talk about each other's differences all the time."
• "What a shame that I know what your DISC profile is, but I don't know why you asked your wife to marry you or where you asked her to marry you."
• "Don't work on what you want to get better at - work on what people need from you most that you're not good at."
• "The question is, who do you want to be? Not who are you today. I think that's the wrong question."
• "My job is to hold up a mirror that other people won't hold."

Resources Mentioned

• Field Note: "When Self-Assessment Harms Your Personal Development"

Register to be part of future conversations in real time hereOr schedule a time to talk directly to our team here Key Highlights

• The four-ingredient framework for compelling visions: Strong purpose (why do we exist?), vivid imagery (people can see and imagine the destination), credibility (prevents eye rolls), and cultural resonance (uses language that connects with your specific team)
• Strategic planning trap revealed: Most organizations develop strategy first, then try to communicate it - but once language gets "baked" into planning documents, it becomes nearly impossible to change the clunky management-speak
• The eye roll test: Before launching your vision, identify every policy, practice, or behavior that contradicts what you're saying - either eliminate them publicly or explain why you can't change them yet
• Leadership fatigue phenomenon: Leaders spend 6 months developing their vision and strategy, then get bored with it just as they need to start communicating it - "the song is in their head but not in anyone else's head yet"
• Making visions actionable: Your vision must be something your average team member can actually do something about in their daily work - if they can't see how they personally contribute, you won't create intrinsic motivation

Notable Quotes

• "You gotta keep the main thing the main thing" - everything you communicate should connect back to your vision and strategy
• "People will believe what you do before what you say" - contradictory actions will undermine even the most compelling vision
• "Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth" - Mike Tyson's wisdom on why 5-10 year strategic plans may be foolhardy in today's world
• "Great place for great people to do great work" - a vision so memorable that an employee could recite it perfectly 10 years later at a new organization
• "You need to look for signals that you're not serious about your vision and strategy" - identifying and eliminating contradictions is critical for credibility

Featured Speaker

• Carolynne Thomas is an Executive Coach and Partner at CRA | Admired Leadership, specializing in strategic organizational communication and leadership coaching. She spends her time helping organizations mobilize around vision and strategy, working across both the leadership and strategic communications practices of the firm.

Resources Mentioned

• Field Note: "The Ingredients of a Compelling Vision"
• Four-question organizational messaging framework

Register to be part of future conversations in real time hereOr schedule a time to talk directly to our team here

 

Key Highlights

• Redefining high potential: High potential does not necessarily equal ready to lead - the skills that make someone excellent in their current role don't automatically translate to leadership capability
• Two critical talent indicators revealed: - "Excellence Someplace Else": Look for people who've achieved excellence in any domain (sports, music, academics) as they understand the work ethic and commitment required to master skills - Deep Self-Awareness: True self-awareness means understanding not just your weaknesses, but how those weaknesses affect other people around you
• Strategic hiring approach: Don't overweight background and track record since you can't determine if success came from the platform, team, or market timing - focus on talent indicators instead
• Talent development principles: Leaders must get out of the way of talented people, remove obstacles, and focus on continuous feedback rather than annual reviews
• Making it systematic: Talent assessment, nurturing, and development should be a standing agenda item with quarterly conversations, not an annual afterthought

Notable Quotes

• "High potential does not necessarily equal ready to lead, or even fit to lead, for that matter."
• "Hiring and managing talent is one of the most strategic and symbolic acts you can do as a leader."
• "True talent finds a way to win in good times and bad, high tide, low tide. They tend to operate well in different contexts, and even different organizations."
• "When's the last time someone misperceived you? And why? Because true self-awareness is understanding weaknesses and also knowing how that rubs off on other people."
• "If they're truly stars, you got to provide direction and guidance... but then get out of the way. You're never going to know their job as well as they know their job."
• "If talent is the most important thing, then we need to make time for it... it needs to be a standing agenda item."

Featured Speaker

• John Cook is an Executive Coach & Partner at CRA | Admired Leadership, specializing in talent assessment and leadership development. As a father of four and avid fly fisherman, he brings both professional expertise and personal perspective to helping senior leaders identify and develop talent within their organizations.

Resources Mentioned

• Field Note: "High Potential for What? Exactly"
• Nine proprietary talent indicators framework
• 10-minute coaching conversations with Admired Leadership coaches