According to Ideological Social Justice, What is our Primary Moral Duty, and How Do We Know What is True?

From Scott Allan’s book, Why Social Justice is Not Biblical Justice

What is our fundamental problem as human beings, according the Ideological Social Justice worldview? Reading from Scott Allan’s book, Social Justice is not Biblical Justice

Examining the tenets of Ideological Social Justice as a worldview and then contrasting them with a Biblical Worldview

At what point did we move from a society that values “equality of opportunity” to a society that demands equality of outcome?”

Why do some utopian social visions have no basis for grace or mercy? Ideological Social Justice as a worldview, is a utopian ideal that has no categories for grace or mercy, let alone redemption. What are the implications of that for a society who adheres to its core tenets?

Before contrasting with the counterfeit —

This episode is the first in a series that aims to offer a warning about the deeply anti-Christian ideas behind much of the modern “social justice” movement which consists of the critical theory mood that is the air we breathe right now in the West. This movement insists on dividing all of society into the oppressors (people of privilege who can do nothing good) and the oppressed (people who can do nothing evil). My goal is to ground my argument in Biblical ideas of Justice.

In this episode, an overview of the history of the judges in the Bible, and then a description of the United States judicial makeup. From there, I ask the question, “What has it actually happened in the United States?” Has the Supreme Court, over time, been found to have unlimited, unchecked power in making laws?

Continued — Biblical Reasons for Patriotism