
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: R v Sweet [2021] QDC 216
Kym Anthony Sweet was charged with committing two criminal drug offences. He argued that he couldn't be charged because he consists of two separate entities:
There was the real-life flesh and blood man that goes by the name Kym-Anthony and then there is a straw man or dummy corporation which goes by KYM ANTHONY SWEET.
And the real person, Kym-Anthony, was not subject to the laws of Queensland. Therefore, he argued, the criminal charges against him should be dismissed.
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: R v Sweet [2021] QDC 216
Kym Anthony Sweet was charged with committing two criminal drug offences. He argued that he couldn't be charged because he consists of two separate entities:
There was the real-life flesh and blood man that goes by the name Kym-Anthony and then there is a straw man or dummy corporation which goes by KYM ANTHONY SWEET.
And the real person, Kym-Anthony, was not subject to the laws of Queensland. Therefore, he argued, the criminal charges against him should be dismissed.

37,605 Listeners

84 Listeners

17 Listeners

819 Listeners

769 Listeners

113,078 Listeners

1,358 Listeners

325 Listeners

555 Listeners

769 Listeners

1,229 Listeners

386 Listeners

936 Listeners

260 Listeners

2,366 Listeners