
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: R v Sweet [2021] QDC 216
Kym Anthony Sweet was charged with committing two criminal drug offences. He argued that he couldn't be charged because he consists of two separate entities:
There was the real-life flesh and blood man that goes by the name Kym-Anthony and then there is a straw man or dummy corporation which goes by KYM ANTHONY SWEET.
And the real person, Kym-Anthony, was not subject to the laws of Queensland. Therefore, he argued, the criminal charges against him should be dismissed.
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: R v Sweet [2021] QDC 216
Kym Anthony Sweet was charged with committing two criminal drug offences. He argued that he couldn't be charged because he consists of two separate entities:
There was the real-life flesh and blood man that goes by the name Kym-Anthony and then there is a straw man or dummy corporation which goes by KYM ANTHONY SWEET.
And the real person, Kym-Anthony, was not subject to the laws of Queensland. Therefore, he argued, the criminal charges against him should be dismissed.

22 Listeners

793 Listeners

641 Listeners

91 Listeners

230 Listeners

329 Listeners

43 Listeners

811 Listeners

35 Listeners

149 Listeners

47,945 Listeners

308 Listeners

44 Listeners

240 Listeners

381 Listeners