
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: R v Sweet [2021] QDC 216
Kym Anthony Sweet was charged with committing two criminal drug offences. He argued that he couldn't be charged because he consists of two separate entities:
There was the real-life flesh and blood man that goes by the name Kym-Anthony and then there is a straw man or dummy corporation which goes by KYM ANTHONY SWEET.
And the real person, Kym-Anthony, was not subject to the laws of Queensland. Therefore, he argued, the criminal charges against him should be dismissed.
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: R v Sweet [2021] QDC 216
Kym Anthony Sweet was charged with committing two criminal drug offences. He argued that he couldn't be charged because he consists of two separate entities:
There was the real-life flesh and blood man that goes by the name Kym-Anthony and then there is a straw man or dummy corporation which goes by KYM ANTHONY SWEET.
And the real person, Kym-Anthony, was not subject to the laws of Queensland. Therefore, he argued, the criminal charges against him should be dismissed.

37,636 Listeners

86 Listeners

25 Listeners

785 Listeners

752 Listeners

111,948 Listeners

1,276 Listeners

307 Listeners

484 Listeners

720 Listeners

1,183 Listeners

386 Listeners

805 Listeners

239 Listeners

2,300 Listeners