
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: R v Sweet [2021] QDC 216
Kym Anthony Sweet was charged with committing two criminal drug offences. He argued that he couldn't be charged because he consists of two separate entities:
There was the real-life flesh and blood man that goes by the name Kym-Anthony and then there is a straw man or dummy corporation which goes by KYM ANTHONY SWEET.
And the real person, Kym-Anthony, was not subject to the laws of Queensland. Therefore, he argued, the criminal charges against him should be dismissed.
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: R v Sweet [2021] QDC 216
Kym Anthony Sweet was charged with committing two criminal drug offences. He argued that he couldn't be charged because he consists of two separate entities:
There was the real-life flesh and blood man that goes by the name Kym-Anthony and then there is a straw man or dummy corporation which goes by KYM ANTHONY SWEET.
And the real person, Kym-Anthony, was not subject to the laws of Queensland. Therefore, he argued, the criminal charges against him should be dismissed.

37,595 Listeners

85 Listeners

21 Listeners

897 Listeners

759 Listeners

113,121 Listeners

1,331 Listeners

351 Listeners

534 Listeners

779 Listeners

1,314 Listeners

454 Listeners

907 Listeners

227 Listeners

2,536 Listeners