Sign up to save your podcastsEmail addressPasswordRegisterOrContinue with GoogleAlready have an account? Log in here.
Welcome to CyberCode Academy — your audio classroom for Programming and Cybersecurity.🎧 Each course is divided into a series of short, focused episodes that take you from beginner to ad... more
FAQs about CyberCode Academy:How many episodes does CyberCode Academy have?The podcast currently has 339 episodes available.
February 05, 2026Course 22 - Digital Forensics: RAM Extraction Fundamentals | Episode 2: Benchmarking Tools and Using MoonSols DumpItIn this lesson, you’ll learn about:Why Benchmarking RAM Extraction Tools MattersHow benchmarking supports defensible tool selection in forensic investigations.Using measurable metrics to justify decisions during reports or court testimony.Understanding that different systems and environments can affect tool behavior.Key Benchmarking CriteriaRAM Footprint: Measuring how much memory the tool consumes while running and how much evidence it overwrites.Extraction Speed: Evaluating how fast a full memory dump can be completed, especially when using high-speed media like USB 3.0 drives.Execution Context: Distinguishing between kernel-mode and user-mode tools, with kernel-mode execution preferred for bypassing OS-level protections such as anti-debugging and anti-dumping mechanisms.MoonSols DumpIt: Technical EvaluationWhy DumpIt is favored for live response and incident handling.Its portable design, allowing execution directly from removable media without installation.An exceptionally small memory footprint (under 1 MB), minimizing evidentiary impact.Proven efficiency, capable of dumping large memory sizes (e.g., ~9 GB) in a matter of minutes.Automatic output as a raw memory image, simplifying downstream analysis and tool compatibility.Live Benchmarking and VerificationObserving DumpIt in real time using Task Manager to confirm actual memory usage.Correlating observed performance with documented benchmarks.Recognizing the significance of the final success confirmation and proper storage of the raw memory image for triage and analysis.By the end of this episode, you’ll be able to benchmark RAM acquisition tools systematically, understand why DumpIt is often chosen as a primary option, and confidently explain your tool selection based on measurable, repeatable criteria rather than preference alone.You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:https://linktr.ee/cybercode_academy...more12minPlay
February 04, 2026Course 22 - Digital Forensics: RAM Extraction Fundamentals | Episode 1: Value, Strategy, and Technical PreparationIn this lesson, you’ll learn about:Why RAM Is Critical Forensic EvidenceHow volatile memory captures data that never touches disk and is lost on shutdown.Recovering private browsing sessions, chat data, webmail content, and remnants of failed wiping attempts.Identifying in-memory malware, including rootkits, injected code, and hidden processes that evade disk-based scanners.Extracting encryption keys and credentials (e.g., BitLocker, TrueCrypt, cached passwords) that unlock otherwise inaccessible evidence.The “RAM Debate”: When to Capture vs. When to SkipUnderstanding how missing RAM evidence can be argued as exculpatory in court.Evaluating the forensic footprint: every capture tool overwrites some memory.Making defensible decisions to omit RAM collection when:The suspect has confessed.Disk artifacts already answer the investigative questions.Live triage indicates the system was likely uninvolved.Learning how to justify your decision either way in reports and testimony.RAM Footprint and Evidentiary IntegrityWhat a RAM footprint is and why courts care about it.Minimizing contamination by selecting lightweight, trusted tools.Documenting tool choice, execution order, and system state to maintain credibility.Hardware Preparation for Live Memory CaptureWhy USB 3.0 magnetic hard drives are preferred over flash drives:Faster acquisition times.Higher capacity for large memory dumps.Reduced risk of incomplete captures.Planning storage capacity based on installed system RAM.Tool Redundancy and Operational ReadinessWhy investigators should maintain 2–4 validated RAM tools.Handling failures caused by OS updates, drivers, or endpoint security controls.Understanding that redundancy is a professional requirement, not overkill.Recommended Free RAM Capture ToolsDumpIt – simple, fast, minimal user interaction.Belkasoft Live RAM Capturer – reliable and widely court-tested.Magnet RAM Capture – integrates cleanly with Magnet analysis workflows.FTK Imager – versatile option when already deployed on-scene.By the end of this episode, you’ll understand not just how to extract RAM, but when, why, and how to defend your decision under scrutiny—turning volatile memory into some of the most powerful evidence in a live forensic investigation.You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:https://linktr.ee/cybercode_academy...more17minPlay
February 03, 2026Course 21 - Digital Forensics: Windows Shellbags | Episode 5: Shellbags Forensics: Validating Network Drive ActivityIn this lesson, you’ll learn about:Validating Network Drive Activity with ShellbagsHow Windows Shellbags act as a silent witness for user interaction with network shares and mapped drives.Why UsrClass.dat is a critical artifact for proving access to remote resources, even when permissions are restricted.Recording Remote Folder AccessHow accessing a mapped network drive (e.g., Z:) generates Shellbag entries.Capturing exact remote folder paths (such as administrative or restricted directories) that a user navigated to.Demonstrating that Shellbags records navigation, not just file creation or modification.Timestamp Behavior in Network ShellbagsUnderstanding how remote MAC times are copied and stored locally:Last Accessed Time: Often reflects the precise moment the user viewed or entered the network folder.Last Written Time: May indicate when the network drive was first connected or when folder view settings were changed.Created Time: Represents the state of the folder metadata at the moment it was first recorded in Shellbags.Recognizing that all timestamps must be interpreted in UTC and converted to local time for reporting.Event Reconstruction and AttributionReconstructing timelines that show who accessed which network location and when.Correlating Shellbag entries with other evidence to confirm intentional user interaction rather than background system activity.Differentiating between mere drive connection and active navigation into specific subfolders.Investigative and Evidentiary ValueUsing Shellbag evidence to prove file awareness and knowledge, not just theoretical access.Supporting cases involving unauthorized access, insider threat activity, or data exfiltration.Reinforcing why Shellbags are especially powerful when files no longer exist or access logs are unavailable.By the end of this episode, you’ll be able to confidently analyze Shellbag artifacts related to network drives, interpret their timestamps accurately, and use them to demonstrate user knowledge and interaction with remote file systems in a forensic investigation.You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:https://linktr.ee/cybercode_academy...more13minPlay
February 02, 2026Course 21 - Digital Forensics: Windows Shellbags | Episode 4: Shellbag Forensics: Tracking USB Device History and Artifact ValidationIn this lesson, you’ll learn about:USB Forensics Using Shellbag ArtifactsHow Windows Shellbags can be leveraged to reconstruct user interaction with removable media.Why Shellbags are valuable for determining whether files were copied to or from USB devices, even when the media is no longer connected.Initial Evidence Generation and CollectionCreating controlled forensic artifacts by moving test files onto a FAT16-formatted USB drive.Exporting relevant registry hives (such as USRCLASS.DAT) using FTK Imager.Loading these hives into Shellbag Explorer for structured analysis.Understanding File System Timestamp BehaviorRecognizing FAT16 limitations, where Last Accessed timestamps record only the date, not the time.Interpreting Created timestamps as the moment files or folders were moved onto the USB device.Understanding why Modified timestamps often remain unchanged during copy or move operations.Shellbag Data Merging and Ghost ArtifactsLearning how Windows may merge Shellbag data when a USB device is reformatted, renamed, or reused.Understanding how previously accessed folders can still appear in Shellbag Explorer due to reuse of the same drive letter or volume identifiers.Identifying “ghost” directories and avoiding false assumptions about current device contents.Handling Multiple Removable DevicesObserving how Windows assigns new drive letters (e.g., E:, then F:) when multiple USB devices are connected.Using Last Write Time values to infer when a USB device was inserted or when its folder view preferences were modified.Forensic Validation and ReportingEvaluating whether timestamps and folder structures logically align with expected user behavior.Understanding why investigators must not rely solely on automated tool output.Emphasizing manual validation to prevent misinterpretation caused by merged or residual Shellbag data.By the end of this episode, you’ll be able to analyze Shellbag artifacts related to USB devices, accurately interpret file system timestamps, and validate whether removable media activity supports or contradicts suspected data exfiltration or injection events.You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:https://linktr.ee/cybercode_academy...more13minPlay
February 01, 2026Course 21 - Digital Forensics: Windows Shellbags | Episode 3: ShellBag Forensics: Practical Validation and Timestamp AnalysisIn this lesson, you’ll learn about:Practical ShellBag Forensics WorkflowHow ShellBags function as registry-based artifacts that record user folder interaction and view preferences.The full investigative cycle: evidence creation, acquisition, analysis, and validation.Registry Hive AcquisitionCreating controlled user activity (e.g., test folders) to deliberately generate ShellBag evidence.Exporting NTUSER.DAT from the root of the user profile and USRCLASS.DAT from the AppData directory using FTK Imager.Required system configuration steps, including enabling hidden files and protected operating system files, to access locked registry hives.Interpreting ShellBag TimestampsUnderstanding the forensic meaning of Last Write Time, which reflects either the first folder access or a change in folder view settings.Differentiating embedded MAC times (Created, Modified, Accessed) as historical snapshots captured when the ShellBag entry was first generated.Correctly handling UTC/GMT timestamps and applying local time offsets to ensure accurate forensic timelines.Validation Through Controlled ExperimentsDemonstrating that changing folder view options (such as switching to large icons) updates the Last Write Time without altering embedded MAC timestamps.Recognizing normal conditions where certain directories—such as system folders or hard-coded shortcuts—do not contain MAC times.Evidence Location AwarenessKnowing where user-specific ShellBag data resides within the Windows registry structure.Understanding how these locations support user attribution and timeline reconstruction during forensic investigations.By the end of the episode, you’ll be able to confidently extract ShellBag-related registry hives, correctly interpret their timestamps, and validate user activity findings through repeatable forensic testing.You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:https://linktr.ee/cybercode_academy...more14minPlay
January 31, 2026Course 21 - Digital Forensics: Windows Shellbags | Episode 2: Forensic System Setup and Local Drive IntegrationIn this lesson, you’ll learn about:Preparing a Forensic WorkstationThe purpose of using a controlled forensic setup to safely extract and analyze system artifacts.Why working from an acquired drive or image is critical for maintaining evidentiary integrity.Essential Tools for Shellbag and Registry AnalysisShellbags Explorer: Used to parse and analyze shellbag artifacts associated with user folder navigation.FTK Imager (Lite): A portable, self-contained tool for accessing drives and exporting forensic artifacts without installing software on the target system.Loading a System Drive as EvidenceHow to use “Add Evidence Item” in FTK Imager to load a local physical drive (e.g., the C: drive).Understanding the evidence tree and how FTK represents the file system for forensic browsing.Navigating the File System for Forensic ArtifactsTraversing the directory structure within FTK Imager to locate user-specific data.Focusing on the Users directory and individual user home folders, which contain critical registry files.Target Registry Files for AnalysisIdentifying user-specific registry hives stored within the home directory.Understanding why these files are essential inputs for tools like Shellbags Explorer when reconstructing user activity.By the end of the episode, you’ll be able to set up the required forensic tools, load a system drive as evidence, and confidently locate the registry hives needed to analyze shellbags and other user activity artifacts.You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:https://linktr.ee/cybercode_academy...more15minPlay
January 30, 2026Course 21 - Digital Forensics: Windows Shellbags | Episode 1: Windows Shellbags: Forensic Fundamentals and Deep Dive AnalysisIn this lesson, you’ll learn about:What Windows Shellbags Are and Why They MatterHow shellbags are registry-based artifacts created by Windows Explorer to store folder view preferences.Why they are a powerful source of user activity evidence, even when files or folders no longer exist.How Shellbags Are Created and UpdatedThe specific user actions that trigger shellbag updates, such as resizing windows or changing icon views.Why even casual folder browsing can leave long-lasting forensic traces.Forensic Value of ShellbagsHow shellbags persist even after folders are deleted or external/network drives are removed.How they enable user attribution, allowing investigators to determine which user accessed which path and when.Registry Locations and Data SourcesThe role of NTUSER.DAT and USRCLASS.DAT in storing shellbag data.The importance of the BagMRU registry key for tracking hierarchical folder navigation.Manual Reconstruction and ValidationHow investigators can manually “walk” BagMRU subkeys to reconstruct exact directory paths.Using hex and Unicode analysis to identify drive letters and folder names.Why manual validation is essential for evidence verification and expert testimony, even when automated tools are used.By the end of the episode, you’ll understand how Windows Shellbags record user navigation activity, where this data lives in the registry, and how to manually reconstruct folder paths to validate forensic findings with confidence.You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:https://linktr.ee/cybercode_academy...more14minPlay
January 29, 2026Course 20 - Malware Analysis: Identifying and Defeating Code Obfuscation | Episode 5: Identifying and Analyzing Cryptography in MalwareIn this lesson, you’ll learn about:Why Malware Uses Cryptography and EncodingHow encryption and encoding are used to conceal payloads, configuration data, and command-and-control traffic.The difference between encoding (obfuscation for transport) and encryption (confidentiality and anti-analysis).Why cryptographic protections are often the final barrier hiding a malware sample’s true behavior.Common Encoding and Encryption TechniquesSimple schemes such as XOR loops and Base64 for lightweight obfuscation.Strong cryptographic algorithms including AES and RC4 to protect embedded payloads and network communications.How multiple layers of encoding and encryption are frequently combined to slow down analysis.Identification TechniquesEntropy analysis to detect encrypted or compressed data, with high entropy values indicating strong obfuscation.Searching for cryptographic constants and algorithm “magic values” used during initialization.Import and library inspection to identify usage of cryptographic APIs or external crypto libraries.Analysis Tools and WorkflowUsing PE Studio for rapid triage to identify packing, suspicious imports, and anomalous strings.Tracing decryption routines in IDA Pro to locate keys, loops, and payload-handling logic.Leveraging dnSpy for .NET malware to view high-level encryption and decryption functions directly in decompiled code.Deobfuscation StrategiesDynamic analysis: pausing execution after decryption occurs to extract clean payloads or strings from memory.Static reimplementation: recreating the decryption logic in scripts or plugins to automatically decode all protected data.Choosing the fastest approach based on malware complexity and the analyst’s objectives.You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:https://linktr.ee/cybercode_academy...more19minPlay
January 28, 2026Course 20 - Malware Analysis: Identifying and Defeating Code Obfuscation | Episode 4: Dynamic API Resolution: Walking the PEB and ParsingIn this lesson, you’ll learn about:Why Malware Builds Its Own Import TablesHow bypassing static, dynamic, and runtime linking hides API usage from analysis tools.Why this technique is especially valuable for shellcode, which executes without a normal Windows loader.How custom API resolution breaks automated inspection and signature-based detection.Locating System Libraries via the PEBAccessing the Process Environment Block (PEB) through the FS register (offset 0x30).Navigating PEB_LDR_DATA to enumerate loaded modules.Walking linked lists such as InMemoryOrderModuleList to locate key DLLs.Extracting the image base (DLL base address) from LDR_DATA_TABLE_ENTRY.Manual Parsing of the PE FormatUsing the e_lfanew field (offset 0x3C) to locate the NT Headers.Navigating the PE Data Directory to find the Export Table.Understanding the role of:Address of FunctionsAddress of NamesAddress of Name OrdinalsChecksum-Based API ResolutionIterating through exported function names without storing them in cleartext.Computing a checksum for each name at runtime.Matching computed values against hard-coded checksums embedded in the malware.Resolving the correct function pointer using ordinals and function address tables.Indirect API InvocationStoring resolved function addresses in a custom array.Executing APIs via indirect calls (e.g., call eax) instead of named imports.Why this completely hides functionality from the binary’s static import table.You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:https://linktr.ee/cybercode_academy...more17minPlay
January 27, 2026Course 20 - Malware Analysis: Identifying and Defeating Code Obfuscation | Episode 3: Analyzing and Defeating String Obfuscation in NativeIn this lesson, you’ll learn about:String Obfuscation in Native Malware:Why string analysis is significantly harder in native code compared to interpreted languages.How compiled binaries store logic as machine instructions inside formats like the Portable Executable (PE), requiring reverse engineering rather than simple string extraction.Core Native String-Hiding Techniques:Stack Strings: Constructing strings dynamically on the stack using assembly instructions instead of storing them in readable sections of the binary.Checksum-Based Resolution: Hiding API and file names by comparing runtime-generated hashes against hard-coded checksums to build dynamic import tables without exposing cleartext strings.Encrypted Strings: Using encryption algorithms to keep strings unreadable until they are decrypted during execution.Static Analysis and String Recovery:Leveraging advanced extraction tools to recover stack strings that standard utilities cannot detect.Manually reconstructing strings in disassembly tools by converting numeric byte values into ASCII characters.Using cross-references (Xrefs) to confirm which functions are responsible for resolving APIs or decrypting strings.Dynamic Analysis and Debugging:Verifying static findings by stepping through execution in a debugger and observing register values and memory changes.Inspecting memory with appropriate commands to correctly display Unicode or multi-byte strings that contain embedded null bytes.Reversing Checksum Logic:Tracing low-level assembly operations such as bit rotations (ROL) and XOR instructions used to generate hashes from strings.Understanding normalization steps, such as converting strings to lowercase, to ensure consistent checksum comparisons across systems.You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:https://linktr.ee/cybercode_academy...more16minPlay
FAQs about CyberCode Academy:How many episodes does CyberCode Academy have?The podcast currently has 339 episodes available.