1. English Translation
Petr Bittner: The New Soundtrack of the Old Christian Democrats
The Christian Democrats announce a change. After the municipal and senate elections, it seems that in cooperation with the Mayors, they have found a way to sell this change to a sufficient number of voters. The commentator world, looking at the (not only) personnel confusion of the democratic opposition, has been so hypnotized by the marketing itself that the question of whether this will be a change for the better has somehow been overlooked. With your permission, I will focus on South Moravia, where everything is always the most interesting – and of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that I live here.
"People want change," shouted Jakub Hruška in Brno immediately after the votes were counted. He is a representative of the party that co-governed the last three election periods and would like to invite old friends from ODS to the fourth. So, the handover of the mayoral chain at the city hall will probably be more of a ritual – without wanting to diminish the obvious increase of progressive forces. The Christian Democrats have simply learned networks, so they know that even an unchanging profile needs to change its profile picture from time to time.
A somewhat more significant change concerns, for example, the senate duel between Zdeněk Papoušek and Karel Zitterbart, who will face each other in the second round. To the question from the organization We Are Fair, whether he supports gay and lesbian marriage with all rights including joint adoption of children, Papoušek answered: "I do not have a clear opinion."
Well, I don't know, but I think many of Papoušek's voters do have a clear opinion. And before the second round, they should know that by choosing a popular and unorthodox figure, they may be voting against their own beliefs. And maybe I should not be the one to point this out, but the long line of liberal subjects and personalities who express unwavering support for him – yet here we are.
Papoušek has a reputation as a "decent person." But "decent people" here in Brno have also been called real Nazis. Historian Jan Tesař once wrote that this "decency" is, among other things, an "effective tool for promoting indecent ideas." Such a decent person may hesitate whether to grant you the same rights as himself. For a person affected by this wavering about whether to remain a second-class citizen, decency probably looks different.
It may be even more interesting for fans of the new attractive face of the opposition from the Christian Democrats, Jan Grolich. The young, fresh, agile, likable, funny, singing governor answered "no" in the same survey for certainty. Meanwhile, the viral dance, which has painfully flooded all the screens I had to stare at because of my profession in recent weeks, was usually performed by Christian Democrats exclusively with same-sex partners and without visible civilization consequences.
It would be unpleasant to find out that the change the new Christian Democrats are supposed to bring means a change for the worse in human rights. Today, we especially need strong liberal voices in the Senate as a counterbalance to conservative and ultra-conservative currents in the Chamber and government. We have already seen that the Senate can do this a few times in the past. In June, for example, Adéla Šípová and other senators helped reject the tightening of conditions for gender change. She will also defend her mandate in the second round. LGBT people and their true allies in Czech society count votes, not reach.
Petr Bittner is a publicist and media advisor.
2. Summary
The article discusses the recent changes announced by the Christian Democrats in the Czech Republic, especially after municipal and senate elections. Cooperation with the Mayors seems to have helped them attract more voters, but the author questions whether this change is truly positive. The article focuses on South Moravia, highlighting the upcoming senate duel between Zdeněk Papoušek and Karel Zitterbart, particularly on their views about gay and lesbian marriage. Papoušek's unclear stance contrasts with the clear opinions of many voters. The author warns that the change might lead to a decline in human rights, emphasizing the need for strong liberal voices in the Senate to balance conservative forces. The article ends by noting the importance of voting and supporting genuine allies of the LGBT community.
3. Reading Comprehension Exercise
1. What political change is the article mainly discussing?
2. Who is Jakub Hruška, and what did he say after the elections?
3. What is Zdeněk Papoušek’s position on gay and lesbian marriage?
4. Why does the author mention historian Jan Tesař’s view on "decency"?
5. What role does the author believe the Senate should play regarding human rights?
4. Key Vocabulary (English → Czech)
- change – **změna**
- voter – **volič**
- cooperation – **spojení**
- mayor – **primátor**
- election – **volby**
- opinion – **názor**
- human rights – **lidská práva**
- liberal – **liberální**
- conservative – **konzervativní**
- mandate – **mandát**
- alliance – **spojenci**
- society – **společnost**