
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


As the Brewers inch closer to 100 wins and a deep postseason run, radio voice Lane Grindle reflects on one of the most memorable seasons in franchise history. From the team's relentless style of play and growing national respect to the challenges that still await in October, Grindle discusses why this club feels different from past contenders. The conversation also explores the final pieces the Brewers hope to solidify before the playoffs, the importance of pitching depth, and why many around baseball are openly rooting for Milwaukee to capture its first World Series championship.
The Packers are back in the win column, and Jason Wilde breaks down what Green Bay's gritty victory over the Jets really means. The conversation centers on the team's ability to overcome injuries, the emergence of Lucas Van Ness as a game-changing defender, and why the win may provide a much-needed confidence boost after a lengthy drought. Wilde also discusses the impact of Micah Parsons' presence, the growing concerns over Green Bay's penalty problems, and what the Packers must clean up before a quick turnaround against Atlanta. While the performance was far from perfect, the segment explores why an ugly win can sometimes be exactly what a team needs.
Gas prices continue to climb across Wisconsin while communities search for creative ways to attract new residents and workers. The hour also looks at the Packers' gritty overtime win over the Jets, what it revealed about the team heading into a short week, and why the Brewers continue to build momentum as they chase both 100 wins and a deep postseason run. Plus, a unique Lake Geneva competition celebrates a Wisconsin tradition, and legal analyst Royal Oakes examines the First Amendment battle sparked by the Trump administration's decision to revoke White House credentials for several major news organizations.
A legal battle is brewing between the White House and several major news organizations after the Trump administration revoked press credentials for CNN, MSNBC, and Politico. ABC News legal analyst Royal Oakes joins the show to explain the First Amendment issues at the center of the lawsuit, the limits of presidential authority over press access, and how past fights involving reporters and administrations of both parties could shape the outcome. The conversation explores the distinction between denying access to specific events and banning reporters from the White House press corps, the legal standards that courts have applied in similar disputes, and what the upcoming hearings could mean for the future relationship between the presidency and the press.
From the publisher's feed