Original piece here. Bo’ness Gauge ‘O’ Group Facebook page here.

Thank you for reading Daniel's Den. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Daniel's Den is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Original piece here.

Thank you for reading Daniel's Den. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Daniel's Den is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thank you for reading Daniel's Den. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Daniel's Den is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

My review of Knife appeared in the Freethinker a couple of weeks ago; here are the opening paragraphs.

‘What you have made will long endure.’ This is how Salman Rushdie signed off one of his last emails to his friend Martin Amis. Amis was dying from oesophageal cancer (the same cancer that killed his and Rushdie’s old comrade Christopher Hitchens) and Rushdie was still recovering from the savage attack against him in Chautauqua, New York when those words were written. Amis had previously written to Rushdie, of seeing him for the first time since the attack, that ‘I expected you to be altered, diminished in some way. Not a bit of it: you were and are intact and entire. And I thought with amazement, He’s EQUAL to it.’

Simple expressions of love and solidarity between two men all too well acquainted with the destroying angel: the perfect riposte to death, and to the bigotry and fanaticism of those, like Rushdie’s attacker, who worship it. This is just one of many life-affirming moments in Rushdie’s account of what Amis so appropriately calls ‘the atrocity’ of August 2022 and its aftermath, Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder. Like the late Amis (who died last May), what Rushdie has made will long endure. His contributions to literature will endure for their power and beauty and truth, not because of the horrors inflicted upon their author. Still, and though he would prefer not to be defined by those horrors, his courage and his unswerving commitment to the defence of free expression in the face of them—this example, too, will long endure.

Continue reading here.

Daniel's Den is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thank you for reading Daniel's Den. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Original piece here.

Original piece, with links, here.

Daniel's Den is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thank you for reading Daniel's Den. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Original, written version, with links, here.

Thank you for reading Daniel's Den. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Daniel's Den is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

First reading and more thoughts on Napoleon here.

Daniel's Den is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thank you for reading Daniel's Den. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Race Hochdorf’s piece on Napoleon.

Below, a photo of my copy of Frank McLynn’s Napoleon biography, the painting on whose cover has long enthralled me. It is, apparently, of Napoleon at Borodino. Also below, my hardback of Napoleon the Great. While I’m at it, Philip Dwyer’s Napoleon trilogy is also well worth reading. Both McLynn and Dwyer are much more negative than Roberts, and wrongly so as far as I’m concerned, but they are still brilliant and insightful biographers.

Roberts’s account is, in my view, the best biography—or at least the best single-volume biography in the English language. Admittedly, I have not read Adam Zamoyski’s 2018 biography, but I do recommend his debate with Roberts about whether Napoleon deserves to be called ‘the Great’. As I recall, Roberts undeservedly lost the debate. Pfeh—foolish audience!

Thank you for reading Daniel's Den. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Daniel's Den is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

See the piece as originally posted below.

Thank you for reading Daniel's Den. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Daniel's Den is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.