D&C Podcast Network

1. The first recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on November 30 by a resident who lives at the southern edge of the neighborhood. He used a digital camera to capture the sound which can be heard faintly here. (Headphones recommended)

2. The November audio was analyzed by University Rochester professor Ming-Lun Lee, who extracted and enhanced the audio to reveal a conspicuous tone with a frequency of about 315 hertz.

3. The second recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on May 1 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

4. The third recording was made at 7:40 p.m. on May 7 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

1. The first recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on November 30 by a resident who lives at the southern edge of the neighborhood. He used a digital camera to capture the sound which can be heard faintly here. (Headphones recommended)

2. The November audio was analyzed by University Rochester professor Ming-Lun Lee, who extracted and enhanced the audio to reveal a conspicuous tone with a frequency of about 315 hertz.

3. The second recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on May 1 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

4. The third recording was made at 7:40 p.m. on May 7 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

1. The first recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on November 30 by a resident who lives at the southern edge of the neighborhood. He used a digital camera to capture the sound which can be heard faintly here. (Headphones recommended)

2. The November audio was analyzed by University Rochester professor Ming-Lun Lee, who extracted and enhanced the audio to reveal a conspicuous tone with a frequency of about 315 hertz.

3. The second recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on May 1 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

4. The third recording was made at 7:40 p.m. on May 7 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

1. The first recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on November 30 by a resident who lives at the southern edge of the neighborhood. He used a digital camera to capture the sound which can be heard faintly here. (Headphones recommended)

2. The November audio was analyzed by University Rochester professor Ming-Lun Lee, who extracted and enhanced the audio to reveal a conspicuous tone with a frequency of about 315 hertz.

3. The second recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on May 1 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

4. The third recording was made at 7:40 p.m. on May 7 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

In this episode. Practising surgery on 3D printed organs, Is Rochester's largest medical cannabis supplier eyeing the recreational cannabis market?, we check in on law enforcement efforts to charge suppliers of opioids with higher level crimes and there are efforts to expand the city's bikeshare program into other areas of the city.

The VA has kept the inspection information and ratings for its own nursing homes secret, until a joint USA Today/Boston Globe investigation forced the VA into releasing the data. The VA Canandaigua Living Center in N.Y. was one of 60 facilities out of 133 nationally to receive the lowest one-star rating. Patti Singer reports. For more on that story go to https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2018/06/17/secret-va-nursing-home-ratings-canandaigua-one-star/699774002/

1. The first recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on November 30 by a resident who lives at the southern edge of the neighborhood. He used a digital camera to capture the sound, which can be heard faintly here. (Headphones recommended)

2. The November audio was analyzed by University Rochester professor Ming-Lun Lee, who extracted and enhanced the audio to reveal a conspicuous tone with a frequency of about 315 hertz.

3. The third sound file is a recording made at 12:30 a.m. on May 1 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

4. The fourth recording was made on May 7 at 7:40 p.m. in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

1. The first recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on November 30 by a resident who lives at the southern edge of the neighborhood. He used a digital camera to capture the sound, which can be heard faintly here. (Headphones recommended)

2. The November audio was analyzed by University Rochester professor Ming-Lun Lee, who extracted and enhanced the audio to reveal a conspicuous tone with a frequency of about 315 hertz.

3. The third sound file is a recording made at 12:30 a.m. on May 1 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

4. The fourth recording was made on May 7 at 7:40 p.m. in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

1. The first recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on November 30 by a resident who lives at the southern edge of the neighborhood. He used a digital camera to capture the sound, which can be heard faintly here. (Headphones recommended)

2. The November audio was analyzed by University Rochester professor Ming-Lun Lee, who extracted and enhanced the audio to reveal a conspicuous tone with a frequency of about 315 hertz.

3. The third sound file is a recording made at 12:30 a.m. on May 1 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

4. The fourth recording was made on May 7 at 7:40 p.m. in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

1. The first recording was made at 12:30 a.m. on November 30 by a resident who lives at the southern edge of the neighborhood. He used a digital camera to capture the sound, which can be heard faintly here. (Headphones recommended)

2. The November audio was analyzed by University Rochester professor Ming-Lun Lee, who extracted and enhanced the audio to reveal a conspicuous tone with a frequency of about 315 hertz.

3. The third sound file is a recording made at 12:30 a.m. on May 1 in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.

4. The fourth recording was made on May 7 at 7:40 p.m. in the central part of the neighborhood. This is Lee’s enhanced version of an obvious 315-hertz tone.