Would you believe that one high school kid revolutionized how we viewed the Commerce Clause today? Or that the idea of the Wild West came from a small town that just had too much time on their hands? Join us in our newest episode where we talk about U.S v. López and Palisade, NV.Rate and Review us on the Apple Podcast app!Also follow us on our socials and visit our website for our sources!!Website: dejureaintdefactopodcast.squarespace.comTwitter: @DJADFPodcastInstagram: @dejureaintdefactoDisclaimer: We are not lawyers, and we cannot give any legal advice under any circumstances. All information presented is out of our research done online and for entertainment purposes. If you have any legal questions, seek an attorney.Mucho luv

Ever heard of the switch in nine that saved time or have unresolved Catholic trauma Well then this episode is for you as we talk about West Coast Hotel v. Parrish and Catholic Pope History! Rate and Review us on the Apple Podcast app!Also follow us on our socials and visit our website for our sources!!Website: dejureaintdefactopodcast.squarespace.comTwitter: @DJADFPodcastInstagram: @dejureaintdefactoDisclaimer: We are not lawyers, and we cannot give any legal advice under any circumstances. All information presented is out of our research done online and for entertainment purposes. If you have any legal questions, seek an attorney.Mucho luv

Has a coworker ever slipped you a note letting you know you were getting paid unfairly in the past 20 years? Who knew sex discrimination in Alabama would lead to Obama's first bill signed into law. Or... have you tried to seduce someone and it went horribly wrong? Well in 2016, if you were in South Carolina you might have gone to jail for it.Rate and Review us on the Apple Podcast app!Also follow us on our socials and visit our website for our sources!!Website: dejureaintdefactopodcast.squarespace.comTwitter: @DJADFPodcastInstagram: @dejureaintdefactoDisclaimer: We are not lawyers, and we cannot give any legal advice under any circumstances. All information presented is out of our research done online and for entertainment purposes. If you have any legal questions, seek an attorney.Mucho luv

Will you sue about pants? Because apparently this guy did in this week's topic of Pearson v. Chung. We will also be talking about first wave feminism and how citizenship didn't grant the right to vote. Rate and Review us on the Apple Podcast app!Also follow us on our socials and visit our website for our sources!!Website: dejureaintdefactopodcast.squarespace.comTwitter: @DJADFPodcastInstagram: @dejureaintdefactoDisclaimer: We are not lawyers, and we cannot give any legal advice under any circumstances. All information presented is out of our research done online and for entertainment purposes. If you have any legal questions, seek an attorney.Mucho luv

Welcome to our first episode of de podcasts (we swear it would get better). Hopefully you stick around for next week.This week we would be covering the origins and current legality of Common Law Marriage (did you accidentally marry your roommate? — jk jk :) ) We are also covering the first case that utilized the Equal Protection Clause in the 14th Amendment. It's a very interesting case where a law is race-neutral on its face, but administered in a prejudicial manner.Rate and Review us on the Apple Podcast app!Also follow us on our socials and visit our website for our sources!!Website: dejureaintdefactopodcast.squarespace.comTwitter: @DJADFPodcastInstagram: @dejureaintdefactoDisclaimer: We are not legal professionals, and we can not give under any circumstances legal advice. All information presented is out of our research done online and for entertainment purposes. If you have any legal questions we suggest seeking a legal professional.Mucho luv

Welcome to our first episode of de podcasts (we swear it would get better). Hopefully you stick around for next week.This week we would be covering the origins and current legality of Common Law Marriage (did you accidentally married your roommate? — jk jk :) ) We are also covering the first case that utilized the Equal Protection Clause in the 14th Amendment. It's a very interesting case where a law is race-neutral on its face, but administered in a prejudicial manner.Rate and Review us on the Apple Podcast app!Also follow us on our socials and visit our website for our sources!!Website: dejureaintdefactopodcast.squarespace.comTwitter: @DJADFPodcastInstagram: @dejureaintdefactoDisclaimer: We are not legal professionals, and we can not give under any circumstances legal advice. All information presented is out of our research done online and for entertainment purposes. If you have any legal questions we suggest seeking a legal professional.Mucho luv