Calling Nicolas Maduro illegitimate exposes Western hypocrisy over Venezuela’s historic dictators and oil and I've got the receipts! Right, so calling Nicolás Maduro illegitimate has now detonated the entire Western Venezuela narrative, because a sitting president has been seized in the name of democracy while the men who actually cancelled elections, ruled by decree, and filled mass graves before him were treated as trusted partners. That’s the end position. That’s the scandal. And the reason it matters is buried in a history you’re not supposed to line up. So this isn’t a news update. This is checking the receipts. Because this is the same manoeuvre every time. Dictatorship shrugged off when oil stayed obedient. Mass killings tolerated when soldiers were sent into the streets. No sanctions, no indictments, no moral panic — right up until Venezuelans elected governments that stopped handing control outward. So in this video I’m going to drag that history into the open, stack it against what’s just happened, and show you why this arrest doesn’t prove dictatorship at all — it exposes something far more embarrassing, and far more dangerous, for the people pretending to enforce democracy. Right, so the United States has decided that Nicolás Maduro is illegitimate. It has indicted him under US criminal law. It has made his removal an explicit objective. And it keeps insisting this is about democracy, legality, and human rights. Well that claim doesn’t survive contact with Venezuela’s history, you don’t even have to delve too much into it, a cursory glance in fact Is enough to tear it to smithereens. For most of the twentieth century Venezuela was ruled by men who cancelled elections, suspended constitutions, governed by decree, imprisoned opponents, tortured dissidents, and killed civilians. Washington recognised all those governments. It funded them. It armed them. It protected them diplomatically. There were no sanctions. No indictments. No legitimacy lectures. Oil flowed and that was all that matters.