Detox Protocol Archives - Mindshift Care

Episode 5: Learn what neurotoxins do to objective ADHD testing results.

Download the Ambassador Slides HANDOUT to share.

These figures show raw data from a neuropsychological test. Participants are asked to look at a computer screen as different shapes with varying colors go across the screen. They are given specific instructions to click one button on a remote if, for example, a red square is different than the previous shape that has already gone off the screen. If it is the same color and shape a second button is chosen.

Therefore, the neural reflex arc involves the visual cortex, prefrontal cortex for a decision based upon a predetermined rule, and ends with a physical response (button click).

I have seen a thousand of these tests like these and got to the point that I could guess the T-score based upon visual inspection of the raw data (below) within one decimal point. The only way I could do that is because what we call ADHD is nothing more than delayed neural processing-decision-variable response (PDV) by 1/4 of a second.

Figure 1: Normal Controls (without ADHD). Green represents a correct response during a 20 minute computerized test (x-axis). The pink arrow roughly estimates the trend of responses over time.

Figure 2: Classic ADHD Pattern. Pink represents responses that are, on average, 1/4 second slower than controls. There is typically more delay and incorrect answers that worsens as the test progresses.

Figure 3: ADHD = 1/4 Second Reaction Delay. Both of the above graphs are superimposed upon each other.

Therefore, what we observe phenotypically as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder is nothing more than 1/4 second PDV Response delay. This could occur from a long list of potential causes, including:

Neurotoxins

Traumatic Brain Injury

Hippocampal shrinkage due to EMF waves, neurotoxins, chronic insomnia, chronic elevated cortisol, PTSD, depression

Screen time radiation

Episode 3: PFAS comes out of the body during Ionic Foot Bath.

https://vimeo.com/1055803788

Download the Ambassador Slides HANDOUT to share.

Introduction

Polyfluoryl-alkyl Substances (PFAS) represent 15,000 different variations of long chains of fluoride, a known neurotoxin, that bioaccumulate in plants and animals.1 In humans, they have been associated with kidney cancer, increased cholesterol, and thyroid problems to name a few.2 PFAS is commonly referred to as “forever chemicals” due to the fact they stay in the body from 3-27 years, depending on the form.3 Ongoing bioaccumulation risks remain for those working in industries with frequent exposure, dump sites, contaminated water supplies, food packaging, painting, electroplating, carpet installation, carpet treatment, serving as a firefighter, working with ski wax, waterproofing material and construction materials.1, 4 Public awareness has not yet caught up to the existing science and there is a paucity of recommendations available for the informed consumer.

The available data for daily exposure for the general population to PFAS comes out of Canada and Norway.5 Daily consumption was 90% dietary with intake of 73 ng/day, on par with dust and air inhalation exposure. A follow-up study combined types of PFAS and estimated daily consumption as high as 250 ng per day. This study aims to validate ionic foot bath treatments remove PFAS from the human body, paving the way to correlate with improved health outcomes.

This study analyzes the removal of PFAS from a human subject by an inexpensive ionic foot bath machine.

Materials

Hand-crafted copper foot basin from India. (I now recommend using the plastic tubs to avoid electrical current problems.)

Ionic Cleanse Detox machine from Better Health Company, round double coil array. Model BHC-CTRL-01, 24 W, 2A, 12V DC.

One gallon per session of distilled water, steam distillation from Premium Waters, packaged 05/27/24 12:06, best by 05/27/2025.

GreenPan anodized ceramic cooking pot

Pink Himalayan salt, 1/4 cup per session

Methods

An initial serum PFAS level was obtained using the PFASure test from Any Lab Test Now.

One 30-minute foot bath session was conducted with the Ionic Cleanse Detox Machine using distilled water with 1/4 cup of pink Himalayan salt.

Water sample testing was conducted on both the clean and dirty foot bath water using SimpleLab.

Before

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

Before

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

Results

The initial serum PFAS result was 7 ng/mL, which falls in the Medium Risk Category (<2 preferred, 2-20 elevated risk health risks, >20 high risk of bad health outcomes).

The clean sample of distilled water used in the initial foot bath came back from the lab totally free of PFAS.

The dirty water from my very first foot bath was also sent off for 3rd party, independent testing. The PFAS results was 49.7 PPT (parts per trillion), which is over 12 times the new EPA drinking water standard (<4 PPT). The lab results is below:

RESULTS of distilled water after the first foot bathDownload

Initial ValuesUnit Conversions0.0000497 PPMmg/L0.0497 PPBmicrogram/L49.7 PPTng/L49,700 PPQpg/LThe total amount of excreted PFAS was 0.18813438 micrograms (188.13 ng).

Discussion

This study will need to be duplicated if it turns out that PFAS comes out readily during electrolysis.

Recommendations

Mindshift Care Protocol for PFAS Elimination

The Firefighter's Detox is for Everyone

STAGE 1:Limit exposure. Filter water all the time.Ionic foot baths or sauna.Educate yourself.

Creative Visualization and Meditation of being fully detoxed.

STAGE 2:Ketosis to kill fat cells storing toxins.

Stage 3:

Eliminate toxic vegetable oils from the diet.

Next Steps

Stay tuned for a new curriculum to be coming out. The Mindshift Method for nutrition strings a few diets concepts in a row depending on individual health needs.

References

1.            National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine, Health, et al. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Guidance on PFAS Exposure, Testing, and Clinical Follow-Up. National Academies Press (US)

Copyright 2022 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.; 2022.

2.            Joglekar R, Liddie J, Olson ED, Faber S, Schnettler J. The Environmental Justice Implications of PFAS. Env't L Rep. 2024;54:10911.

3.            Snedeker SM. Toxicants in Food Packaging and Household Plastics: Exposure and Health Risks to Consumers. Molecular and Integrative Toxicology. Springer; 2014.

4.            Tittlemier SA, Pepper K, Seymour C, et al. Dietary Exposure of Canadians to Perfluorinated Carboxylates and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate via Consumption of Meat, Fish, Fast Foods, and Food Items Prepared in Their Packaging. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2007/04/01 2007;55(8):3203-3210. doi:10.1021/jf0634045