Tulsi Gabbard, the United States Director of National Intelligence, is facing intense scrutiny over a whistleblower complaint alleging she blocked Congress from accessing sensitive intelligence. According to the Times of India, the controversy erupted from a spring 2025 phone call detected by the National Security Agency between a person close to President Donald Trump and an individual linked to foreign intelligence. The whistleblower's attorney, Andrew Bakaj, claims Gabbard took a paper copy of the material to White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, instructed the agency not to publish it, and directed details solely to her office.
The Independent reports the complaint was filed on May 21, 2025, after an initial contact in April. Acting Inspector General Tamara Johnson reviewed it on June 6 and found the main allegation not credible, unable to assess a second claim about unreported potential crimes. The document sat until this week due to reviews by Biden-era and current inspectors general, staff changes, a government shutdown, and executive privilege checks. Intelligence Community Inspector General Christopher Fox stated he would not have flagged it as urgent if handling it initially.
Gabbard strongly denies wrongdoing. In a statement shared on X and cited by Reuters via the Times of India, she says she acted immediately on December 4, 2025, once notified to provide security guidance for congressional sharing. She notes both inspectors general deemed the complaint not credible and not urgent, so the 21-day transmission rule did not apply. Gabbard accuses Democratic Senator Mark Warner, vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, of spreading lies for political gain, endangering national security.
Reactions split by party. Republican Senator Tom Cotton called it another baseless attack on Trump policies, agreeing with the inspectors general. Warner insists the law required relay within 21 days. Bakaj plans an unclassified briefing to committees soon.
Gabbard released a timeline emphasizing proper handling of highly classified material. The standoff raises questions about intelligence transparency versus security in a polarized Washington.
Thank you for tuning in, listeners. Please subscribe for more updates. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.
For more http://www.quietplease.ai
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.