This episode continues our examination of how justice unfolds over time — not just in verdicts, but in process.

Change of venue decisions are often treated as neutral procedure. This episode asks what those decisions mean for families, communities, and public oversight — especially when the record offers little explanation.

As always, we’re documenting what the record shows, what it doesn’t, and what families are left to carry in between.

If you have documents or firsthand knowledge connected to this case, we encourage you to reach out.

We read everything.

—

Dismal Freedom Press

After the murders, the court files didn’t close.

They split.

While the criminal case moved forward, a separate decision was made in family court — largely out of public view.

Two children were left behind.

Michael Jr.And Marcus.

Custody was awarded to Kimberly’s family.Michael’s family was not.

There was no public explanation.No accessible record laying out how the decision was reached.

Only an outcome — and a family understanding of why it happened.

This episode looks at what the record shows, what it does not, and how custody decisions were shaped in late-1970s California. It places one family’s experience alongside historical research on cross-racial custody outcomes, sealed family court proceedings, and the long-term consequences of decisions made quietly and far from public scrutiny.

Because when courts decide who raises the children, they also decide who remains present in their lives.

This episode follows the paper trail — and what’s missing from it.

Thanks for reading Dismal Freedom Press! This post is public so feel free to share it.

n Episode 2 of the Dismal Freedom Press Podcast, we examine what is publicly documented about the night Michael and Kimberly Millbrook were killed — and what remains unclear decades later.

This episode focuses on:

What contemporaneous reporting establishes about February 1

How early investigative narratives take shape

The limits of police reports and court summaries

Why fear, pressure, and community context often vanish from the record

Rather than reconstructing the night for shock value, this conversation asks a different question:What does the justice system choose to remember — and what does it leave families to carry alone?

This is investigative conversation, not reenactment.

In this episode of Dismal Freedom Press, we examine how a single letter connects three generations of one family’s experience with violence and the justice system.

What begins with the 1980s murder of Michael and Kimberly Millbrook in Modesto, California, extends into questions about custody, access to justice, trial relocation, and the long-term consequences families carry long after court cases close.

This conversation explores:

How custody decisions shape families for decades

What happens when trials are moved away from victim communities

How unresolved trauma carries forward into later generations

Why gaps in official records matter as much as documented facts

The role of letters, testimony, and memory in building a historical record

This is not true crime for entertainment.

It is investigative conversation, family testimony, and accountability journalism.