The assassination of Charlie Kirk was an act of pure evil. But few truly understand what that word means.

Multiple "inferior courts" (pun intended) are refusing to follow the Supreme Court's declaration of precedent on a variety of issues. In particular, SCOTUS declared that you cannot ban "arms in common use FOR LAWFUL PURPOSES." These courts are declaring that the citizen must show that they are "in common use FOR SELF DEFENSE." This same sort of twisting the law is in common use by Democrat judges who simply refuse to obey the Supreme Court.

We're seeing an epidemic of transgender mass murderers. They were all seriously depressed, and likely on SSRIs that can cause murderous thoughts. There are serious roadblocks to being able to identify them before they kill innocents.

It's essential that we create a safe harbor in HIPAA for reporting these deranged people before they pull the trigger. It's also essential that we get rid of the orthodoxy that transgender is somehow "normal."

And, BTW, "assault weapon" is a meaningless term.

The Supreme Court has made it clear that you have a right to carry a weapon pretty much everywhere. Unfortunately, many lower courts are ignoring the Supreme Court. So let's set the stage. Next time we'll cover some ways that lower courts are dodging their duty.

YouTube resources

The Four Boxes Diner - Mark Smith - https://www.youtube.com/@TheFourBoxesDiner 

Washington Gun Law - William Kirk - https://www.youtube.com/@WashingtonGunLaw

Tom Grieve - https://www.youtube.com/@AttyTomGrieve

The Armed Attorneys - https://www.youtube.com/@ArmedAttorneys

Director of National Intelligence Gabbard has declassified the receipts that expose a massive Deep State Conspiracy. But there are some rules for how a conspiracy theory becomes meaningful.

DNI Gabbard's release of the Russiagate receipts is unleashing a legal tsunami with Barack Obama at its center. We discuss the major legal issues.

There is a constitutional requirement for the nomination of judges, and the Chief of Staff running the autopen isn't it.

Trump's battles in the courts are leading to important wins, but primarily on process. In the Birthright Citizenship case (Trump v CASA), the Supreme Court shut down those nationwide injunctions. Now the issues can percolate through the Courts in proper order.

Every case against Trump is in the "process" stage. Not one of them has actually reached the "merits" stage, where a court looks at the facts and the law together. All of the "restraining orders" and "injunctions" are based on first impressions. 

Federal Judge Boasberg takes his oath very lightly. He completely ignores the federal rules of judicial ethics, and is utterly unrestrained by the Supreme Court precedents that regulate him. Is it any surprise that he is happy to rule against the Trump administration? Of course, then there's the rest of the story.

Details on Boasberg can be found at https://x.com/search?q=boasberg%20judge&src=typeahead_click&f=top 

Follow Laura Loomer's reporting at https://x.com/LauraLoomer