Here is the point that I'm trying to make:
1.) That deal was specifically for Crowder. Hard to tell how truly bad it was because he didn't reveal most of the deal or how much they offered him.
2.) Crowder has all the leverage in the world. He doesn't need that deal or any deal.
3.) A kid coming up with no audience, leverage or fanbase shouldn't get as good of a deal as Crowder. Why would he or she? This isn't a charity. If you are a nobody & you want to sign to a mega-corporation that can quickly give you money, success, an audience, fame & a career... it is not that crazy for them to want a percentage of some part of your brand.
4.) If my channel gets demonetized, I lose money. If Crowder gets demonetized, he loses money. So he should really show the full deal so we can see how crazy it was. If he would lose millions on his own if he didn't sign while taking full risk, why is it that crazy that a company would try to protect themselves from financial loss if he gets demonetized? Crowder could have tried to negotiate that out of the deal instead of airing it on YouTube. I wouldn't want it in there. I'd negotiate something different & more beneficial to me. But in my opinion he's kind of misleading people, leaving stuff out & not even trying to be honest about the full picture. You might not want to hear any of this but it's completely true. He is hiding most his contract, how much he made, who did it, what type of deal it was & confusing people who know nothing about entertainment contracts into thinking that a kid with no following should get the same deal as Crowder. It seemed like a garbage deal & the right wing media is fake. Just not really in the way Crowder is saying in my opinion.