Due Diligence by Sasha Latypova Podcast

Correction for my post from yesterday. The DOD still has OWS press conferences videos up, the link I had before stopped working. Here is a new link. But it’s an important reminder that the DOD ran a racketeering scam with bioweapons and the plan to continue in the new administration. Nothing really changed.

I previously wrote on the subject of nanotechnology-in-vaccines, i.e. claims of nanobots assembling from vaccine ingredients and connecting humans to the internet. They are a mythological (technocratic cult) nonsense:

If you are interested in this topic, I would like to bring to your attention the recent paper by Dr. Anne Ulrich, published in peer review which provides some much needed sanity vis-à-vis the nanobot/nanotechnology narrative. She is much better qualified than I am in this subject area.

Dr. Ulrich is a full Professor of Biochemistry, Institute of Organic Chemistry (IOC) and Institute of Biological Interfaces (IBG2) at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Fritz-Haber-Weg 6, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.

I highly recommend that you read her paper and listen to this presentation if you are interested in this topic.

Abstract:

Lee and Broudy (2024) reported conspicuous microscopic objects in mRNA vaccines, which they interpreted as “nano-robots”. This is a misconception, because the wide range of different shapes can be readily explained in terms of self-assembling lipids(including cholesterol), as are used for transfection. Lipid nanostructures and their rearrangements will be discussed.

Art for today: The Old Donkey, watercolor, 9x12 in.

Link to video on Rumble

We talked about being banned on YouTube, Operation Warp Speed, Trump’s new cabinet picks, expectations for the new administration, Prep Act, Froot Loops, phony health freedom leaders, SV40 and how it is linked to the JFK assassination, and much more. PLEASE SUBSCRIBE LIKE AND SHARE THIS PODCAST!

Correction: I misspoke about the Vaccine Research Center - it is part of the NIH (NIAID), not CDC. NIH co-owns Moderna “vaccine”. However, CDC holds patents for mRNA shots, and is part of the same quasi-government structure.

Follow Mike Farris:Twitter/X- https://x.com/CoffeeandaMikeInstagram- https://www.instagram.com/coffeeandamike/Facebook- https://www.facebook.com/CoffeeandaMike/YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/@CoffeeandamikeRumble- https://rumble.com/search/all?q=coffee%20and%20a%20mikeApple Podcasts-

Gab- https://gab.com/CoffeeandaMikeLocals-

https://coffeeandamike.locals.com/

Website- www.coffeeandamike.comEmail- [email protected]

Art for today: The Race, watercolor, 9x12 in.

Video on Rumble

Video on Bitchute

This is a recording from Dr. Jane Ruby Show on Nov 6, right after the election day. Jane is a controversial figure to many, but she is a friend to me. She has been uncompromising in bringing the truth to the public, often breaking stories years before they become “acceptable” to the “health freedom” movement, whatever that is. She was the first who recognized what I was trying to bring forward as evidence of adulteration (unregulated poison) in mRNA injections. At the time I had zero social media presence, and I owe her gratitude for this. She called out Dr. Malone as a b******t artist approximately a full year before I came to the same conclusion. So, thank you Jane, for opening my eyes even after I thought my eyes were opened already.

In this segment we are discussing the implications of Trump’s election win, and the likelihood he will acknowledge the danger of mRNA. And we are also discussing the US Government Dual-Use Research of Concern (DURC) policy document, which has been updated in May 2024. A more detailed article on DURC is coming right after this, on Nov 15. Stay tuned.

Art for today: Wilderness, watercolor, 10x14 in.

If you were not able to watch live, here is the recording. My segment starts around 9:30 min. I also recommend listening to Jay Battacharya’s segment which is right after mine.

Video on Rumble.

Art for today: Sketch of water lilies, oil on panel, 11x14 in.

I scheduled this interview because I have been following Jamie’s project with great interest. You can learn more about it from his own publication here on Substack:

Please consider following and supporting Jamie’s project. Finding the truth is vital to restoring scientific integrity.

Here are the video clips which we reviewed over zoom:

* An insufferable beta-male sales rep talking about real-time PCR:

* A miracle of combining battery powered heating elements and LED lights in a plastic box - Lucira PCR home test for covid! Brought to you by geniuses at Pfizer:

* Have you always wanted to know your lizard’s ethnicity? Now you can! Brought to you by the failed science of genetics.

As I previously reported, 23&Me is going out of business as their mountain of DNA data is useless.

Art for today: The Catch, watercolor, 9x12 in.

Video on Rumble

Video on Bitchute

For those of you who are not a paid subscriber to Delingpod, this interview is now available in free access. Don’t miss this podcast! This is one of my favorite recent in-depth conversations.

Art for today: Hunters, watercolor, 12x16 in.

Video on Rumble

Video on Bitchute

This is a video discussing my recent article on anaphylaxis:

Anaphylaxis is anything from mild allergy to shock and is induced by vaccines, specifically by injecting proteins. Injecting ANY foreign protein, including foodstuffs that are “generally considered safe” is not safe. Bypassing the digestive tract creates a state of anaphylaxis, i.e. the body’s immune system goes haywire gets sensitized to the substance and starts attacking itself. This explains BOTH, the historical “epidemics”, such as the cholera and the plague and the current epidemic of chronic illness, obesity, neurodegeneration, food allergies and much more. Food is not toxic. There is almost no way to induce all this illness via food. If we stop vaccinations we will solve the vast majority of the chronic illness, especially in younger people.

Art for today: Still life with hollyhocks, oil on panel, 14x18 in.

Jackson v. Pfizer 2nd Amended Complaint was dismissed at the District Court on August 9, 2024. Brook is going to the appellate court, and I wanted to hear from her attorney about the status of the case and the future strategy.

Note - there were some technical difficulties recording this video (poor internet connection) as Warner was traveling in the area affected by a recent hurricane.

Full court document here.

As I reported previously, the US government has repeatedly sided with Pfizer against Brook who has been trying to obtain justice under False Claims Act since she was fired from Pfizer’s clinical trial site for noticing and reporting numerous violations of clinical trial protocol and procedures.

The US Government’s argument in siding with Pfizer was, ludicrous - stating that the cost and time of the court discovery was unwarranted and was contrary to the US public health policy. I have reported on the government motion to intervene and dismiss here:

Since Brook has filed her case 3 years ago, it has become increasingly clear that indeed, it is the United States public health policy to poison, kill, disable and sterilize people by products that are forced onto the population under false pretenses of “prophylactic vaccines”. The history of this intentional poisoning program repeats the same patterns of lies, fear mongering, poisoning and subsequent denial and cover-up.

The remarkable worldwide private sector science and crowd sourced document review and data analysis exposing DNA contamination, vaccine ingredients, genetic effects, and other adverse events has been compiled and has been introduced in court filings by Brook’s legal team. Neither Judge Truncale nor DOJ took any notice of this evidence. Neither have provided any coherent explanation about why exposing fraud in the clinical trials would be contrary to United States public health policy.

Previous reporting on Brook Jackson’s case:

Art for today: Portrait with Hollyhocks, oil on linen, 24x30 in.

On Tuesday I connected with Leslie Manookian of Health Freedom Defense Fund to discuss her victory in the US Courts of Appeal for the 9th District, the largest in US, comprising several western states, including California.

I set up this interview, because I think this win is highly significant. Leslie and her colleagues were able to finally make a dent in a 120 yo legal precedent (Jacobson v Massachusetts), the case which has been used ever since to justify the forced systematic poisoning campaign by the US Government, masquerading as “public health measures”.

From Jacobson:

"The state legislature proceeded upon the theory which recognized vaccination as at least an effective if not the best known way in which to meet and suppress the evils of a smallpox epidemic that imperiled an entire population. Upon what sound principles as to the relations existing between the different departments of government can the court review this action of the legislature?  

If there is any such power in the judiciary to review legislative action in respect of a matter affecting the general welfare, it can only be when that which the legislature has done comes within the rule that if a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health the public morals or the public safety has no real or substantial relation to those objects or is beyond all question a plain palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the courts so to adjudge and thereby give effect to the Constitution." 

Full 9th circuit decision here:

Interview notes:

* Leslie described the history of the case HFDF filed v LAUSD.

* We talked about the Jacobson case, which was:

-about smallpox, which may or may not be caused by a virus (IMO, its not) but was rather deadly (30%-40% death rate);

-applied ONLY to Cambridge MA, not even the entire state;

-was about Jacobson not wanting to pay a state-imposed fine of $5 (~$160 today);

-did not say anything about state power to force the injection or coerce anyone via denial of basic liberties or employment;

-it was believed that the vaccine stopped transmission of smallpox (it doesn’t, but that was the belief of the court at the time and it was not challenged by Jacobson);

-for context, 120 years ago the eugenics beliefs were a fashionable open attitude in the society, reflected in laws and practices. Now it is just as cherished by the power elites but they prefer to camouflage it in “equity-diversity-sustainability” slogans.

* Leslie provided some relevant case law developments since Jacobson, namely the court decisions that affirmed and even fortified the concept bodily autonomy/privacy since then. Did you know that it was illegal to use condoms in CT in the 1950’s?

* We discussed the case v LAUSD in detail, including the despicable behavior of the defendants lying to court and trying to evade judicial review. They clearly demonstrated that the only thing they were defending is the state’s power to control people’s bodies. That’s rich for the rabid democrats obsessed with abortions on demand any time including after full term birth. And turns out, in the 9th Circuit they can’t have it both ways…

* In the final portion of the interview we talked about how this victory can be leveraged going forward: many lawyers are now updating their cases based on this win, it is a good time to challenge any “vaccine” on CDC schedule that does not stop transmission of the disease (including polio, numerous toxoids, pertussis, flu, etc.) None of them really do anything other than poisoning, but in many cases CDC admits there is no prevention of the disease, and this can be used to challenge any mandate. This can also be used to challenge any non-vax mandates - testing, tracing, masking!

* We discussed the insane and unconstitutional HHS quarantine powers briefly. I reported on this here.

* Ultimately, this and other cases must challenge the federal kill box laws. We talked about what can be done in the courts. The courts are set up against the people and in favor of the government, so realistically we can aim at small victories. However, some relatively small things can undermine, disable and stall large structures.

The federal kill box laws themselves or the state versions of them to argue that the constitutionally protected right of an individual to not be killed by anyone, is violated by the kill box laws.  This is especially evil as these laws enable and legalize homicide by a public health proxy such as a pharmacist or nurse administering a lethal injection that's falsely presented as a medicinal product

And so it is now possible, because of the light shed on these things over the last couple of years to litigate those two prongs established by Jacobson and put before a court the evidence and the argument that public health emergencies themselves are a fictional construct. 

They are not "real or substantial." 

They're pretextual. They're derived exclusively from fraudulent diagnostic testing protocols combined with homicidal treatment protocols to deceive people, to confuse people, to get people to be afraid, and to get people to then comply with the lethal injection programs. 

And so from that perspective and with that evidence, the public health emergency laws and regulations and programs promulgated by Congress and the federal executive branch and the administrative agencies are beyond all question, "plain, palpable invasions of rights secured by the fundamental law." 

You can read all case documents here on HFDF website. Please consider supporting Leslie and HFDF.

Art for today: Rotterdam, NL, watercolor from my sketchbook.

We talked about several subjects, including VAERS data, financial reset, collapse of the empire, EUA countermeasures and more…

Art for today: Spring flowers, from my sketchbook.