Acts chapter 2 is a familiar passage to us. We generally return here every year at Pentecost and celebrate the coming of the Holy Spirit and the birth of the Church. So, I don’t want to belabor the text this morning, but I don’t want to gloss over it either. There are a few significant matters that I want to note about verses 1-13.
Pentecost in the Old Testament
Pentecost comes from the Greek word for fifty and follows the count of 50 days after Passover (Leviticus 23). The Feast of Weeks is the second of three Pilgrim feasts. Pentecost comes at the end of Barley harvest to thank God for His care and provision.
In Exodus 19 we read that the Israelites reached Mount Sinai in the third month after leaving Egypt. Rabbi’s calculated that God gave the law, then, during the Feasts of Weeks. One of the Jewish sacred texts (Jubilees) describes how the thanksgiving during the Feast of Weeks was expanded to include gratitude for God’s care and provision in giving the law.
Finally, according to Jewish oral tradition (the Midrash), when God gave the law on Mount Sinai the people saw sound waves of fire spread over the people and rest above their heads to personally give the law to each Israelite. God also spoke in 70 languages, to indicate it was meant for all peoples. Now, it is not significant whether this truly happened, because it is not described in Scripture. What is significant is that God-fearing Jews (the people present on this day in Acts) would have known this oral tradition and this is how we should approach the text.
The God-fearing Jews would have made connections between the giving of the law and what was happening here… God is giving us something.
He comes into dwell in Hearts [2:1-13]
The coming of the Holy Spirit is spectacular. It begins VISUALLY. There is the sound of rushing wind. I find it noteworthy that the sound is emphasized, not the wind. Perhaps this is a reference to John 20 when Christ teaches His disciples about the Comforter and blows on them. Perhaps the significance is in the sound.
Then there is the fire. Fire signifies the presence of God in the Old Testament, the burning bush, the pillar of fire and the fire that burns the peak of Mt. Sinai (Ex. 3, 13, 19). But God makes the giving of the Holy Spirit visual, so that everyone might know what He is doing: the fire divides and rests above every believer and they are FILLED with the Holy Spirit. Just like Jesus said they would be. The Comforter is given to each of His disciples in that upper room. Then He VERIFIES the giving of the Holy Spirit with an unmistakable sign: speaking in foreign languages. This is a point that cannot be argues any other way… the disciples spoke known languages that were unknown to the speaker. Why does God do this? He enables His disciples to explain what is happening to the God-fearing Jews in their own tongue. This could not be misunderstood. Paul quotes Isaiah in 1 Corinthians 14:20-22 that God would speak to His people in foreign tongues because they did not listen to the prophets’ warnings. This is what He does here.
The New Covenant comes into focus here: God promised that He would establish a new covenant with His people, giving them a heart of flesh, sending His Spirit to dwell within His people and write His law upon their hearts. This is exactly what takes place… God’s Spirit comes to dwell in human hearts. That requires a change of heart and God would forgive their sins (Jeremiah 31:33-34, Ezekiel 11:19-20, 36:26-27). The New Covenant - in His blood - is fulfilled at the coming of the Holy Spirit.
Is this PREscriptive or DEscriptive? There are some that say that faith is followed by the baptism of the Holy Spirit and that you must speak in tongues as the external evidence. They teach Acts 2 is prescriptive. The context argues against this, though. People ask what they should do and Peter tells them to repent and be baptized and they will receive forgiveness of sins and the promise of the Holy Spirit. That is New Covenant language (forgiveness and the Spirit). Nowhere does the text say that the converts speak in tongues. Verse 41 underscores that the signs are performed by the apostles and not the new converts. There is an external sign given of internal faith: baptism.
He comes to work in Hearts [2:14-4:31]
WITNESS. Peter preaches three times in the following chapters and each time He centers the response on repentance. This brings us to an important question: is baptism necessary for salvation? It appears that Peter makes this point in 2:38. Linguistically this doesn’t work, but perhaps a comparison with his other sermons will help us. In 4:19 he gives the same invitation, however this time he says nothing about baptism. In speaking to the High Priest he centers his defense on the need for repentance and does not mention baptism. Baptism does not lead to anything, except a public declaration and witness of God’s New Covenant work in your heart.
FAITH. After Peter’s first sermon 3000 believe. After Peter’s second sermon they stop counting everyone and only mention 5000 men. This is a matter of days or weeks and the circle of believers is multiplying. After his second sermon Peter is being taken away in handcuffs and people still get saved. The Holy Spirit not only empowers His disciples for witness, He is changing the hearts of hearers and taking up residence there as well.
Peter appears before the same men that questioned and arranged Christ’s crucifixion six weeks earlier. This is where Peter denied Christ… and now - filled with the Holy Spirit - Peter gives an incredibly bold witness to Christ. And - I love this reaction - they notice that they had been with Christ (4:13). Now that is where this became personally convicting for me. Should I not walk in the Spirit in such a way that our opponents recognize that I have been with Christ?