Thank you Katharine Hill, Roxy Morgan, Nancy Dangelo, Donna Buchness, and many others for tuning into my live video with Marlon Weems! Join me for my next live video in the app.
Summary
In this discussion, Egberto Willies and Marlon Weems analyze the dangers of Donald Trump’s proposed tariff war against Canada, Mexico, and China, highlighting the economic and political fallout. They discuss how past tariff policies backfired, raising consumer prices and harming American industries, particularly agriculture. Weems and Willies emphasize that tariffs function as a hidden tax on Americans and warn that retaliatory actions from trade partners could permanently damage U.S. economic standing. The conversation also touches on Trump’s broader strategy of using tariffs to manipulate budget figures while benefiting the wealthy at the expense of working-class Americans.
Key Takeaways
* Tariffs as a Tax on Americans – Trump’s tariffs will not harm foreign countries but will instead raise costs for U.S. consumers and businesses.
* Past Trade War Failures – The last round of tariffs during Trump’s presidency devastated American farmers and led to costly bailouts.
* Retaliation from Trade Partners – Canada and Mexico are already preparing countermeasures, potentially cutting the U.S. out of vital trade relationships.
* Hidden Economic Agenda – Tariffs allow Trump to inflate revenue figures, justifying tax cuts for the wealthy while increasing financial burdens on working people.
* Potential Economic Recession – Rising fuel, food, and manufactured goods costs could drive inflation and push the U.S. economy toward another downturn.
Progressive Closing Statement
Trump’s reckless approach to trade is not about strengthening America—it’s about enriching the powerful while leaving working-class Americans to suffer the consequences. If his tariff war proceeds, everyday people will pay more for food, gas, and essential goods, all while corporations and billionaires enjoy tax breaks. The real solution lies in fair trade policies that protect jobs, encourage cooperation with allies, and ensure economic gains benefit all Americans—not just the wealthy elite.
The United States has long been a dominant force in global trade, leveraging economic power to influence international markets and establish advantageous agreements. However, when tariffs are used recklessly, they can quickly backfire, harming the very industries and consumers they are meant to protect. This is precisely what former President Donald Trump’s approach to trade policies has done in the past—and appears likely to do again should he return to office. In a recent discussion, financial expert Marlon Weems and progressive commentator Egberto Willies delved into the ongoing fallout from Trump’s threats to impose sweeping tariffs on key trading partners—Canada, Mexico, and China. Their conversation underscored the economic, political, and strategic consequences that the U.S. will likely regret as these nations respond with their own countermeasures.
The Pattern of Trade War Failures
Weems rightly points out that Trump’s history with tariffs has been disastrous. During his first term, the trade war with China was marked by retaliatory measures that crippled U.S. agriculture. China, faced with increased tariffs on steel and aluminum, retaliated by slashing purchases of American soybeans and other agricultural goods, causing billions in losses for American farmers. The government was then forced to issue massive subsidies—over $30 billion in emergency aid—to keep farmers afloat. This bailout money, which came from taxpayer dollars, clearly that the tariffs did not “bring money into the U.S.,” as Trump often claimed, but instead created an economic crisis that the government had to mitigate.
Now, Trump is signaling his intent to reignite trade conflicts, targeting not just China but also Canada and Mexico—America’s two largest trading partners under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which he himself negotiated. This move is particularly baffling, given that the previous tariff experiment resulted in rising costs for American businesses and consumers. Weems highlights that unlike small contractors Trump has exploited in the past, entire nations have the power to push back in ways that could severely disrupt supply chains and increase costs for Americans across the board.
The Economic Reality: Tariffs as a Tax on Americans
One of the most important takeaways from Weems’ analysis is the fundamental misconception surrounding tariffs. Trump’s rhetoric frames tariffs as a punishment imposed on foreign countries, but in reality, tariffs function as a tax on American consumers and businesses. When the U.S. imposes tariffs on Chinese goods, for example, it is not China that pays the tax—it is American importers and retailers who bear the brunt of the cost, which is then passed on to consumers.
For everyday Americans, this means higher prices on everything from household goods to electronics to vehicles. Since many car manufacturers rely on parts from Mexico, a tariff on Mexican imports will drive up car prices. A similar impact will be felt on food costs, as Mexico is a primary supplier of fruits and vegetables, and Canada plays a key role in agricultural trade. Canadian whiskey, tequila, avocados, and even the basic components used in food production could see steep price hikes. The irony is that these tariffs would disproportionately affect the very working-class voters who form the backbone of Trump’s base—those who shop at Walmart and depend on affordable goods to make ends meet.
The Political Blowback: Canada and Mexico Fight Back
Trump’s aggressive trade stance is not occurring in a vacuum. Canada and Mexico are already responding with their own countermeasures, and the consequences could be severe. Canada, for instance, has proposed its own set of retaliatory tariffs and has begun encouraging a “Buy Canadian” movement. This type of economic nationalism could permanently reduce U.S. exports to Canada, cutting off a critical revenue stream for American manufacturers and farmers.
Mexico has also made it clear that it will not tolerate economic bullying. President Claudia Sheinbaum, in a swift and forceful response, reminded Trump that America’s own policies contribute to issues such as drug trafficking. She highlighted the flow of guns from the U.S. into Mexico, which fuels violence in her country. By countering Trump’s narrative with hard facts, she exposed the hypocrisy in his argument that Mexico is solely responsible for fentanyl smuggling.
Furthermore, if Canada and Mexico deepen their trade ties with other nations, the U.S. risks losing its position as their primary economic partner. When China faced American tariffs under Trump, it shifted its agricultural purchases to Brazil—a move that permanently reduced U.S. market share in the soybean industry. A similar shift by Canada and Mexico could have long-lasting consequences, pushing the U.S. further into economic isolation.
The Hidden Agenda: Using Tariffs to Mask Economic Failures
Weems and Willies also discussed the political motivations behind these trade policies. Tariffs are not just a misguided economic tool; they are part of a broader political strategy aimed at manipulating budget figures and justifying tax cuts for the wealthy. Trump understands that by imposing tariffs, the government will collect more revenue in the short term. He can then use these temporary funds to claim that he has “balanced the budget” or “brought in billions from China,” even though these costs are actually being paid by Americans.
This strategy also plays into Trump’s larger pattern of economic deception. He proposes sweeping tax cuts that overwhelmingly benefit the wealthy while implementing hidden tax increases—like tariffs—that disproportionately harm the working class. Meanwhile, large corporations and the ultra-rich benefit from loopholes and tax breaks, further exacerbating wealth inequality.
The Fallout: Rising Costs and a Potential Recession
Ultimately, as Weems warns, this reckless approach to trade could lead to severe economic consequences, including inflation spikes and even a recession. Gas prices could rise significantly due to higher costs on Canadian energy imports. Food prices will climb as tariffs hit agricultural goods from Mexico. Essential consumer products will become more expensive, making life harder for the very people Trump claims to champion.
If history is any guide, these tariffs will not achieve their intended goals. Instead, they will destabilize the economy, alienate key allies, and force the U.S. into reactionary bailouts and financial maneuvering to stave off disaster. Meanwhile, the rest of the world will move forward, finding alternative markets and partners to reduce reliance on American trade.
Conclusion: A Self-Inflicted Economic Wound
Marlon Weems’ analysis, as highlighted in his conversation with Egberto Willies, serves as a critical warning about the dangers of an ill-conceived tariff war. The U.S. stands to lose far more than it gains, as consumers bear the cost of increased prices and businesses face declining exports. Canada, Mexico, and China will not sit idly by; they will retaliate, and their countermeasures will have long-term consequences for American trade.
Instead of pursuing nationalist economic policies rooted in bravado and deception, the U.S. should focus on fair trade agreements that protect workers while maintaining strong international partnerships. A cooperative approach would yield far better economic outcomes than another round of reckless tariffs. Unfortunately, if Trump’s past actions are any indication, he is unlikely to change course. And if the American people do not push back against this self-inflicted economic harm, they will once again pay the price—literally.
To hear more, visit egberto.substack.com
