Henry E. Smith is one of the premier critics of the bundle-of-rights view of property. In this podcast he discusses the nature of property, highlighting the core feature: a presumptive exclusion. He discusses some of the problems with the bundle-of-rights view, highlighting information costs and the forsaking of the core feature of exclusion. Smith is one of nine scholars who contribute to the EJW symposium on the “bundle” view. (Link to his contribution)

Phil Coelho and Jim McClure discuss their research published in EJW and elsewhere showing that top journal papers containing lemmas—intermediate steps in a lengthy proof—are rarely cited by other economists and almost never yield testable propositions. Following Alfred Marshall and Donald F. Gordon, Coelho and McClure argue that longer chains of mathematical reasoning generally have less relevance to understanding real-world economic phenomena.

Drawing on his EJW article, Christopher Martin discusses Emma Rothschild’s influential article “Adam Smith and Conservative Economics,” which treats of a parliamentary debate in 1795–96 as giving rise to two contrasting images of Adam Smith. Martin questions the contrast that Rothschild draws, and recurs to the original debate between William Pitt and Samuel Whitbread, as well as to Smith’s own texts.

Shirley Svorny explains how regulations on the practice of medicine raise costs and restrict access to care. The podcast starts with a discussion of economists’ views on licensing, as summarized in the paper Svorny wrote for EJW, “Licensing Doctors: Do Economists Agree?”

Tawni Ferrarini discusses her paper with James Gwartney and John Morton studying the content of AP® Economics: “Advanced Placement Economics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly” (link). The paper and podcast offer constructive criticism for revising the content of the AP Economics materials. Parents, students, and educators involved in AP Economics will profit from the critique.

David Henderson tells the story of how economists had a significant voice in ending conscription in the United States. The podcast summarizes the paper Henderson wrote for EJW, “The Role of Economists in Ending the Draft.”

W. R. Allen tells the story of the UCLA economics department and the distinctive community of scholarship that developed there. The podcast summarizes the memoir Allen has penned for EJW, “A Life Among the Econ, Particularly at UCLA”.

Jeffrey Rogers Hummel begins with his EJW article, “Death and Taxes, Including Inflation: The Public versus Economists” (link). He and Lawrence H. White move on to the brave new world of central banking and stark fiscal issues now looming in the United States.

Michael L. Marlow discusses his EJW article “Honestly, Who Else Would Fund Such Research? Reflections of a Non-Smoking Scholar”.

Marlow also has been recently published in Cato Institute's Regulation magazine on the often uncounted costs of smoking bans to fraternal organizations, bars, and their patrons.

Richard Timberlake discusses his August 2005 article in EJW, “Gold Standards and the Real Bills Doctrine in U.S. Monetary Policy.”