
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: Flourentzou v Spink [2019] NSWCA 315
In 2012, Dianne and Mario Flourentzou purchased a property in Casula to live in with their three children.
Dianne's mother, Ricky Spink, contributed $165,000 towards the purchase and renovation of the Casula property on the understanding that she could live with them at the property for the rest of her life.
Within 3 years, relationships had soured and Ricky was kicked out of the family home.
Was there any way she could get her money back?
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: Flourentzou v Spink [2019] NSWCA 315
In 2012, Dianne and Mario Flourentzou purchased a property in Casula to live in with their three children.
Dianne's mother, Ricky Spink, contributed $165,000 towards the purchase and renovation of the Casula property on the understanding that she could live with them at the property for the rest of her life.
Within 3 years, relationships had soured and Ricky was kicked out of the family home.
Was there any way she could get her money back?

37,595 Listeners

85 Listeners

21 Listeners

897 Listeners

759 Listeners

113,121 Listeners

1,331 Listeners

351 Listeners

534 Listeners

779 Listeners

1,314 Listeners

454 Listeners

907 Listeners

227 Listeners

2,536 Listeners