
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: Flourentzou v Spink [2019] NSWCA 315
In 2012, Dianne and Mario Flourentzou purchased a property in Casula to live in with their three children.
Dianne's mother, Ricky Spink, contributed $165,000 towards the purchase and renovation of the Casula property on the understanding that she could live with them at the property for the rest of her life.
Within 3 years, relationships had soured and Ricky was kicked out of the family home.
Was there any way she could get her money back?
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: Flourentzou v Spink [2019] NSWCA 315
In 2012, Dianne and Mario Flourentzou purchased a property in Casula to live in with their three children.
Dianne's mother, Ricky Spink, contributed $165,000 towards the purchase and renovation of the Casula property on the understanding that she could live with them at the property for the rest of her life.
Within 3 years, relationships had soured and Ricky was kicked out of the family home.
Was there any way she could get her money back?

37,605 Listeners

84 Listeners

17 Listeners

819 Listeners

769 Listeners

113,078 Listeners

1,358 Listeners

325 Listeners

555 Listeners

769 Listeners

1,229 Listeners

386 Listeners

936 Listeners

260 Listeners

2,366 Listeners