
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: Flourentzou v Spink [2019] NSWCA 315
In 2012, Dianne and Mario Flourentzou purchased a property in Casula to live in with their three children.
Dianne's mother, Ricky Spink, contributed $165,000 towards the purchase and renovation of the Casula property on the understanding that she could live with them at the property for the rest of her life.
Within 3 years, relationships had soured and Ricky was kicked out of the family home.
Was there any way she could get her money back?
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: Flourentzou v Spink [2019] NSWCA 315
In 2012, Dianne and Mario Flourentzou purchased a property in Casula to live in with their three children.
Dianne's mother, Ricky Spink, contributed $165,000 towards the purchase and renovation of the Casula property on the understanding that she could live with them at the property for the rest of her life.
Within 3 years, relationships had soured and Ricky was kicked out of the family home.
Was there any way she could get her money back?

37,636 Listeners

86 Listeners

25 Listeners

785 Listeners

752 Listeners

111,948 Listeners

1,276 Listeners

307 Listeners

484 Listeners

720 Listeners

1,183 Listeners

386 Listeners

805 Listeners

239 Listeners

2,300 Listeners