In this episode, the aim of science is discussed. Boyd’s Scientific Realism as the best explanation for the instrumental reliability of the scientific method is discussed. It is argued that it is indeed the best explanation for the instrumental reliability of science if there are two aims of theory: epistemological and metaphysical.

In this episode, Goodman’s New Riddle of Induction is discussed as well as Boydian Natural Kind Theory. This podcast is inspired by Dr. Quayshawn Spencer and his Philosophy of Science class at the University of Pennsylvania. This podcast talks through whether Boyd’s Natural Kind Theory solves Goodman’s New Riddle of Induction. Moreover, it defends one way in which scientists can objectively defend their classifications and subsequent inductions.

In this episode, Taylor Swift’s newest re-release is discussed. First, the philosophical implication of her deciding to re-record is analyzed. She is on a venture to re-gain her agency and fruits of her labor. Secondly, specific lyrics of “All Too Well” and “Red” are philosophically analyzed. Notions of time, memory, and love are brought to the conversation.

In this episode, FOMO is discussed. The most pure source of happiness is considered (when it is not dependent on outsourcing to others). How does an individual conquer FOMO? Well, the individual should do philosophy as a way of life.

In this episode, Stoicism is discussed. Its compatibility with various experiences of human existence is evaluated. St. Augustine and his Confessions are discussed in light of Stoicism.

In this episode, capitalism and socialism are discussed and compared in regards their foundations and how they relate to principles fairness and equality. John Rawls’ justifications for the welfare state and for inequalities are analyzed. The contention that the justifications for inequality support Capitalist states better than Socialist states is held.

In this episode, social contract theory is discussed. Rationality is evaluated with a moral light. Why do should we hypothetically consent to the social contract? What is so bad about the state of nature that we must cooperate? The choice of whether to cooperate or not has to do with maximization —either straight-forward or constrained. Those are two competing views on rationality as well.

In this episode, general philosophy of mathematics and computer science is discussed. Interviewee, fellow Penn sophomore Thomas Rainow, has thought-provoking responses to classical philosophy questions. Is there inherent chaos or order in nature? How do people come to believe truths in absence of empirical evidence? Listen to hear the discussion on these matters.

In this episode, love is discussed. The distinction between subconscious and conscious love is made (weight of love vs. feeling of love). The contention is held that both types of love enhance our existence. Additionally, they provide a perspective of connection, hope, journey to telos, and a narrative of choice in this existence.

In this episode, friendship is discussed. What makes a friend? Why do we bond with some individuals and not others? If we all connect on a level that is outside the realm of what is material, then how do we make friends? If the immaterial piece of ourselves that forms connections is linked to the ultimate divine source, why do our preferences in friends differ? The argument that this discrimination comes from the exercise of free will (and consequences of that) is held. In addition to these points, the process of becoming friends is explored. It is argued that there must be an introduction, a connection, an evaluation or survey of your feelings in relation to your level of conection with that person, and a shared experience.