<p>Gordin wrote a book about the nuclear bombing of Japan and the insurmountable differences in how it was perceived. How close was the third nuclear strike? How did the main players at the time feel about it, and was it really "only" two nuclear bombs from the start?</p>

Gordin wrote a book about the nuclear bombing of Japan and the insurmountable differences in how it was perceived. How close was the third nuclear strike? How did the main players at the time feel about it, and was it really "only" two nuclear bombs from the start?

ENG BONUS: "There was no reason not to carry out a third nuclear attack on Japan." Says Princeton historian Michael D. Gordin

Na začátku byly rovnice a teorie, na konci doutnající trosky Hirošimy a Nagasaki. Dvacetidílná multiplatformní série mapuje vývoj prvních jaderných zbraní a dopady jejich nasazení. Představuje hlavní aktéry, klíčová rozhodnutí i fatální omyly. Od 21. května až do září – každou středu na ČT24 a ve všech podcastových aplikacích. Moderuje Jaroslav Zoula.

Share ENG BONUS: "There was no reason not to carry out a third nuclear attack on Japan." Says Princeton historian Michael D. Gordin

Sign up to save your podcasts

ENG BONUS: "There was no reason not to carry out a third nuclear attack on Japan." Says Princeton historian Michael D. Gordin

ENG BONUS: "There was no reason not to carry out a third nuclear attack on Japan." Says Princeton historian Michael D. Gordin