South Africa's Presidency has expressed concern over new tariffs that have been imposed on South African exports to the US following President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement.
Trump said "reciprocal tariffs" of 30% would be implemented on South Africa, while also imposing a 10% base tariff, alongside higher individual tariffs for specific countries, including 20% for the EU, 24% for Japan, 26% for India and 34% for China.
"Whilst South Africa remains committed to a mutually beneficial trade relationship with the United States, unilaterally imposed and punitive tariffs are a concern and serve as a barrier to trade and shared prosperity.
"The tariffs affirm the urgency to negotiate a new bilateral and mutually beneficial trade agreement with the US, as an essential step to secure long-term trade certainty," the Presidency said in a statement issued on April 3.
VERY BAD FOR SOUTH AFRICA
Trade specialist Donald MacKay, of XA Global Trade Advisors, said the development was "very bad" for South Africa, which exported about R153-billion to the US in 2024, making it South Africa's second-largest export destination.
It also effectively ended the country's African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) eligibility, despite an ongoing review of the country's status in this regard.
While highlighting that South Africa's tariffs averaged only 7.5% compared with Trump's claim that the country "charged the USA" 60%, MacKay cautioned that "facts don't matter" and the fallout would be negative, particularly for BMW and Mercedes-Benz South Africa, which both export luxury cars to America.
"The President also announce a 25% tariff on autos and it's not clear where the 30% encapsulates the 25%, or if it is on top of. But either way, selling those two cars into the US is going to be a problem."
The US is South Africa's third-largest destination for South African automotive exports, and shipped some R35-billion-worth of vehicles in 2024, or 6.5% of total vehicle exports last year.
In a statement, naamsa | The Automotive Business Council also expressed its concern and CEO Mikel Mabasa expressed hope that the "South African government will activate all available diplomatic channels" to urgently seek clarity on Agoa's future
Should the 30% also apply to South Africa's platinum group metals exports, MacKay cautioned that it would have serious cost consequences for US automakers, which had few alternative sources of supply.
However, the Minerals Council South Africa says platinum group metals, coal, gold, manganese and chrome have been specifically excluded from the tariffs, but raised concern over the inclusion of iron-ore and diamonds in the 30% reciprocal-tariff basket.
"Despite the exclusions, we remain concerned about the adverse impact on business and consumer sentiment and the resultant feedthrough to business investment, consumer spending and ultimately global real GDP growth caused by this unprecedented upheaval in world trade.
"Global growth coming under threat is bad news for the entire South African mining industry," says Hugo Pienaar, chief economist at the Minerals Council.
Likewise, MacKay questioned the sense in applying the 30% to South Africa's agricultural exports, as most of these exports were "counter seasonal" and, thus, did not compete directly with US farmed products.
South Africa's steel and aluminium exports, meanwhile, would also be negatively affected.
MacKay was concerned that workers and businesses in the Eastern Cape (automotives), KwaZulu-Natal (aluminium), Western Cape (citrus), and Gauteng (automotives) would be hurt directly by the development.
In addition, the indirect impacts could also be large, as other products from those countries also hit with high US tariffs "look to find a home", probably at a lower price point than can be achieved by domestic suppliers.
"So I would expect to see tariff applications increase, along with antidumping applications and safeguard actions . . . as countries try to...