It's make or break time for the rule of law at the Supreme Court, as the Trump administration's plan to flood the streets with troops comes to One First Street. The Ninth Circuit says: YES. The Seventh Circuit says: NO. Meanwhile in Virginia, Trump's insurance lawyer Lindsey Halligan is LARPing as US Attorney so she can prosecute his nemesis James Comey. Which motion to dismiss will put this dumb case out of its misery? Selective and vindictive prosecution? Halligan's unlawful appointment? Literal truth of the supposed false statements? And for bonus subscribers: ANTIFA is the new RICO.

Links:

US v. Comey

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71459121/united-states-v-comey/

US v. Giraud [Seventh Circuit Docket]

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71195676/united-states-v-julien-giraud-jr/

Trump v. Illinois [SCOTUS DOCKET]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25a443.html

Oregon v. Trump [Ninth Circuit Docket]

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71554902/state-of-oregon-et-al-v-trump-et-al/

US v. Arnold (Hill)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71664415/united-states-v-arnold/?order_by=desc

Show Links:

https://www.lawandchaospod.com/

BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod

Threads: @LawAndChaosPod

Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.