Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Ep. 35 - Cross-Examination in Criminal Trials: Reasonable Doubt Starts Here
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Ep. 35 - Cross-Examination in Criminal Trials: Reasonable Doubt Starts Here
In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down cross-examination—the trial skill that can change the entire case in the middle of trial. They explain how defense attorneys can win cases without calling a single witness by using the government’s witnesses to build reasonable doubt and tell the defense story through tight, controlled questions.
🧠 What you’ll learn
Why cross-examination is an art (and how it becomes your “conversation with the jury”)
How defense wins without a case-in-chief: no burden + strategic cross
The golden rule: never ask a question you don’t know the answer to
How to cross a police officer in “after-the-fact” cases (like domestic calls)
The difference between misdemeanor cross vs major investigation cross (DUIs, violent felonies, detectives)
How to expose what a witness didn’t see, didn’t do, or left out
Demeanor matters: don’t go “hot” unless the jury gives you permission
How judges stepping in can destroy a witness’s credibility in front of jurors
Why “smoking gun” movie moments are rare—and when to save it for closing
Impeachment: the most satisfying (and effective) cross tool when done right
Bonus: jury panels, mistrials, and why retrials often benefit the prosecution
⚖️ Key takeaway
Cross-examination is one of the fastest ways to create reasonable doubt—through conflicts in evidence, lack of evidence, and credibility problems—without ever putting your own witness on the stand. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18
View all episodes
By PodPopuli MediaIn this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down cross-examination—the trial skill that can change the entire case in the middle of trial. They explain how defense attorneys can win cases without calling a single witness by using the government’s witnesses to build reasonable doubt and tell the defense story through tight, controlled questions.
🧠 What you’ll learn
Why cross-examination is an art (and how it becomes your “conversation with the jury”)
How defense wins without a case-in-chief: no burden + strategic cross
The golden rule: never ask a question you don’t know the answer to
How to cross a police officer in “after-the-fact” cases (like domestic calls)
The difference between misdemeanor cross vs major investigation cross (DUIs, violent felonies, detectives)
How to expose what a witness didn’t see, didn’t do, or left out
Demeanor matters: don’t go “hot” unless the jury gives you permission
How judges stepping in can destroy a witness’s credibility in front of jurors
Why “smoking gun” movie moments are rare—and when to save it for closing
Impeachment: the most satisfying (and effective) cross tool when done right
Bonus: jury panels, mistrials, and why retrials often benefit the prosecution
⚖️ Key takeaway
Cross-examination is one of the fastest ways to create reasonable doubt—through conflicts in evidence, lack of evidence, and credibility problems—without ever putting your own witness on the stand. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18