In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down Michael Jackson: The Verdict, the Netflix docuseries revisiting the 2005 Michael Jackson trial, and the criminal defense strategy that ended in a full acquittal on every count.
The 2005 trial put the biggest star on the planet in front of a California jury on child molestation and conspiracy charges. After a trial that dominated worldwide media coverage, Michael Jackson was acquitted on every count. With the Netflix docuseries reigniting the debate and the billion-dollar Michael biopic bringing a new generation into the story, Monica and Brandon look at what actually happened inside that courtroom, not what the headlines said — including the cross-examination where a key witness swore by a magazine printed years after he ever saw Jackson.
From a criminal defense perspective, they examine how the defense dismantled the prosecution's case through the accuser family's credibility problems, why superfans lying their way onto celebrity juries is a real risk, and how reasonable doubt works when public opinion has already convicted the defendant. Then they turn to the fight that is still alive: Wade Robson and James Safechuck's civil lawsuit against Jackson's companies heading to trial in 2028, why the civil burden of proof is lower, why there is no right to remain silent in a civil case, and the estate's legal war that pulled Leaving Neverland from HBO.
Topics covered in this episode include: Michael Jackson: The Verdict on Netflix, the 2005 Michael Jackson trial explained, child molestation and conspiracy charges, the cross-examination that broke a key witness, jury selection and superfans on celebrity juries, reasonable doubt and the full acquittal, the Wade Robson and James Safechuck civil lawsuit and 2028 trial, civil versus criminal burdens of proof, no Fifth Amendment in civil court, the estate's fight over Leaving Neverland, and the Michael biopic's renewed interest in the case.
Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.
🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast  📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod  🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
Find us everywhere and join the conversation!

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Palm Beach County criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down one of the most infamous true crime cases in South Florida history: the Killer Clown murder of Marlene Warren.

This Palm Beach County cold case dates back to 1990, when Marlene Warren was shot at the front door of her Wellington-area home by someone dressed in a full clown costume and carrying balloons, including one that read “You’re the Greatest.” For decades, the case remained unsolved and became one of the most recognizable and unsettling murder cases in Palm Beach County, Florida.

Monica and Brandon discuss the facts surrounding Sheila Keen, the woman ultimately connected to the case, including the alleged affair with Marlene Warren’s husband, the white Chrysler LeBaron, the clown costume, the balloons, and the forensic evidence that helped revive the investigation years later. They also explain how cold case DNA testing changed the direction of the case and why advances in forensic technology can bring old South Florida homicide cases back to life.

From a criminal defense perspective, Monica and Brandon analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the Palm Beach County prosecution. They discuss circumstantial evidence, stale witness memories, motive, identity, old evidence, search warrants, DNA testing, and the difficulty of proving a murder case decades after it happened. They also explain why a 12-year plea deal for second-degree murder may have made sense when the alternative was risking life in prison at trial.

The episode also covers no contest pleas, best-interest pleas, appellate rights, gain time, Marsy’s Law, victim-next-of-kin issues, and the unusual legal issues created when the defendant later married the victim’s husband.

And, of course, Monica and Brandon ask the question everyone has about this Palm Beach County true crime case: why a clown costume?

Topics covered in this episode include:

Palm Beach County true crime

The Killer Clown murder case

Marlene Warren and Sheila Keen

Wellington, Florida cold case murder

South Florida cold case investigations

Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office investigations

Cold case DNA evidence

Circumstantial evidence in Florida murder cases

Eyewitness identification issues

Motive and affair-based homicide theories

Second-degree murder plea deals

No contest and best-interest pleas

Florida gain time and sentencing exposure

Marsy’s Law and victim rights in Florida

Why old cases are difficult to prove at trial

How forensic technology can reopen cold cases

Monica and Brandon bring their Palm Beach County criminal defense perspective, legal analysis, and signature humor to one of Florida’s strangest true crime cases involving murder, clowns, cold case evidence, plea negotiations, and a fact pattern that still shocks South Florida decades later.

🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a case in West Palm Beach?
Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683. 

In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, we dive deep into the shocking downfall of the Alexander brothers—Tal, Oren, and Alan—the high-flying celebrity real estate tycoons who built an empire selling ultra-luxury properties to billionaires. Once considered elite power brokers, they were recently convicted in Manhattan federal court on multiple counts, including federal sex trafficking. We break down how their horrific MO targeted well-situated, high-society women and college students under the guise of exclusive party culture. This isn't your typical sex trafficking case; it's a terrifying look at unchecked power, manipulation, and the brave survivors who brought them down. Key Topics Covered in This EpisodeThe Illusion of the "Locker Room": How the brothers used their wealth, influence, and attractive lifestyles to groom victims and text each other about their predatory behavior. An Unconventional Trafficking Case: Why the federal government stepped in, utilizing statutes that cover drugging, coercion, and minors without strictly requiring state-line crossing. Tracy Tudor's 2026 Civil Lawsuit: A look at the Million Dollar Listing Los Angeles star's legal action regarding a harrowing 2014 incident where she was allegedly drugged and assaulted by Oren Alexander. Inside the Manhattan Federal Court Trial: Why the defense's argument of "consensual party culture" completely collapsed under the weight of 11 testifying survivors. The Trophy Evidence: The chilling physical evidence—including saved videos and photos of incapacitated minors—that ultimately sealed the brothers' fate. Why Reporting Takes Years: An honest legal breakdown of late reporting, the power dynamics that silence victims, and the incoming wave of civil lawsuits. Federal Court Culture & Final Banter: Why we can't watch federal trials, the wild story of Michael Jackson's trial doves, and a peak behind the curtain of our podcast brainstorming sessions. Subscribe to Come Back With a Warrant, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.
 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
 📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
 🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
 Find us everywhere and join the conversation!
 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18
📞 Need help with a case in West Palm Beach?
Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the arrest of Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate in Miami, the UK extradition request over rape and sex trafficking charges, and what really happens when three countries want the same defendants.
On July 18, 2026, U.S. Marshals arrested the Tate brothers in Miami on a request from the United Kingdom, where prosecutors have charged them with rape, sex trafficking, and related offenses stemming from allegations dating back to 2012 through 2015. Days later, the brothers appeared in Miami federal court, where they were ordered held in federal detention while they fight extradition. Monica and Brandon explain how an international extradition case actually works, from the U.S.-UK extradition treaty and the dual criminality requirement to the limited role a U.S. judge plays in deciding whether someone can be sent overseas.
The episode also covers the brothers' long-running legal saga in Romania, where a human trafficking case remains pending, why they left Romania for Florida in early 2025, and how the still-open Romanian charges complicate the UK request. From a criminal defense perspective, Monica and Brandon walk through the defense strategies available in an extradition fight, why these cases can take months or even years, what detention and bail look like in federal extradition proceedings, and what the Tates' legal team is likely to argue in a South Florida courtroom.
Topics covered in this episode include: the Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate arrest in Miami, the UK extradition request and the U.S.-UK extradition treaty, rape and sex trafficking charges in the United Kingdom, the international extradition process and dual criminality, federal detention and extradition hearings in Miami federal court, the Romania human trafficking case, Interpol and international arrest warrants, defense strategies in extradition proceedings, how long extradition cases take, and the criminal defense perspective on high-profile celebrity prosecutions.
Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.
🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast  📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod  🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
Find us everywhere and join the conversation!

In this episode, hosts Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz speak with Lauren Johnson, a partner at Rabon Kammerer Johnson in West Palm Beach, about the world of whistleblower and business litigation.

Background: Before entering private practice, Lauren clerked for Justice Jorge Labarga of the Florida Supreme Court and U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman in the Southern District of Florida. She talks about how these clerkships influenced her legal writing, sharpened her litigation approach, and gave her a firsthand look at how judges assess cases.

Whistleblower/Qui Tam Litigation: Much of the discussion centers on False Claims Act claims — what's involved in filing a qui tam lawsuit, why such cases are typically sealed at the outset, and the process the government follows when deciding whether to step in. Lauren outlines the kind of evidence whistleblowers must present and explains how the "first to file" rule can shape the outcome of a case.

Retaliation & Confidentiality: The group explores the risks whistleblowers face after coming forward, including retaliation and concerns about being blacklisted within an industry. They also touch on tactics some employers use — like severance agreements or restrictive NDA language — to keep employees quiet.

Types of Fraud: Lauren walks through the range of cases her firm regularly handles, from healthcare and Medicare/Medicaid billing fraud to false certifications, safety violations, and business conflicts tied to contracts, non-compete agreements, and improper computer access.

Civil/Criminal Crossover: The conversation also covers areas where civil disputes overlap with criminal law, such as illegal recordings, hacking accusations, and business conflicts that carry potential criminal exposure.

Rapid-Fire Segment: To wrap up, Lauren offers quick answers on manipulative executive behavior, risky email phrasing, things professionals should avoid putting in writing, and warning signs to watch for in business litigation.

Guest: Lauren Johnson, Esq.
 Firm: Rabon Kammerer Johnson
 Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
 For more info: https://www.complexbusinesslitigation.com/professionals/lauren-johnson/
Subscribe to Come Back With a Warrant, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.
🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a case in West Palm Beach?
Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the Gilgo Beach murders, the investigation into Rex Heuermann, and the legal issues surrounding one of the most disturbing modern serial killer cases in the United States.

The conversation covers the Long Island cold case that began in 2010, when multiple victims were discovered near Gilgo Beach. Monica and Brandon discuss how the victims were targeted, why sex workers and vulnerable women are often overlooked in criminal investigations, and how the case remained unsolved for years before new forensic developments helped investigators connect the evidence.

They also examine Rex Heuermann’s arrest in July 2023 and his guilty plea on April 8, 2026, exactly 1,000 days later. The episode explores the avalanche of evidence against him, including DNA evidence, witness descriptions, his Chevy Avalanche, documentation referred to as a “blueprint” of the crimes, and the now-infamous pizza crust DNA evidence that helped corroborate the investigation.

From a criminal defense perspective, Monica and Brandon explain why some cases become damage-control cases, why forensic evidence can be extremely difficult to overcome, and why a plea may become the only realistic path when the evidence is overwhelming. They also discuss how multiple similar acts can be used to show modus operandi, pattern, planning, and identity in serial crime prosecutions.

The episode also touches on civil lawsuits filed by victims’ families, potential wrongful death claims, proceeds from media interviews or books, and the question of whether family members of an offender can face civil liability. Monica and Brandon also discuss the FBI Behavioral Science Unit, serial killer profiling, and the risks of giving violent offenders a platform.

Topics covered in this episode include:

The Gilgo Beach murders

Rex Heuermann and the Long Island serial killer case

Cold case investigations

DNA evidence and forensic technology

Pizza crust DNA evidence

The role of victim vulnerability in criminal investigations

Sex workers and victim credibility

Modus operandi and similar fact evidence

Serial killer profiling and the FBI Behavioral Science Unit

Plea deals in high-evidence murder cases

Wrongful death lawsuits after criminal convictions

Civil liability and victims’ families

The criminal defense perspective on overwhelming evidence

Monica and Brandon bring their criminal defense insight to a true crime case that raises serious questions about policing, victim advocacy, forensic evidence, plea negotiations, and how the justice system handles serial homicide cases.

Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system.

Subscribe to Come Back With a Warrant, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.
 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a case in West Palm Beach?
Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683. 

Probation can look like a break from jail — but in Florida criminal cases, it can also become one of the fastest ways to end up back in custody.

In this episode of Come Back With a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down probation from the legal side: how people end up on probation, what probation conditions really mean, how violations happen, and why a “good deal” is not always as good as it sounds.

Monica and Brandon explain the difference between general and special conditions of probation, technical violations, material violations, restitution issues, new law violations, drug and alcohol testing, travel restrictions, early termination, and final violation of probation hearings. They also discuss why probation officers have so much power, why violations can lead to no-bond warrants, and why the lower burden of proof at a VOP hearing can make these cases especially risky.

The episode also covers real courtroom stories, including defendants running from court, probation violations based on new arrests, DUI probation issues, driving while license suspended, sex offender probation violations, and the difficult choice between jail time and long-term supervision.

Topics include:
• What probation means in criminal court
• Jail vs. probation plea offers
• General conditions vs. special conditions
• Technical vs. material probation violations
• Why VOP warrants are often no bond
• Final violation of probation hearings
• Lower burden of proof in VOP cases
• Restitution, court costs, and ability to pay
• DUI probation, treatment, and testing
• Travel restrictions and probation modifications
• Early termination of probation
• Why probation can be a gift, a curse, or both

This episode is for entertainment and educational purposes only and is not legal advice. If you are facing a criminal charge, probation violation, warrant, DUI, VOP, or any other criminal case, speak with a qualified criminal defense attorney in your jurisdiction.

Subscribe to Come Back With a Warrant, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.
 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a VOP case in West Palm Beach?
Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683. 

In this episode of Come Back With a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the Randy Herman case, the Palm Beach County murder case featured in Hulu’s documentary Dead Asleep. The case centered on one unusual and controversial defense: sleepwalking.

Monica and Brandon discuss the death of Brooke Preston, Randy Herman’s confession, the defense theory that he may have been sleepwalking, and why the case ultimately turned on questions of intent, timeline, forensic evidence, and whether the sleepwalking defense was reasonable under the facts.

Unlike many murder trials where the defense argues mistaken identity or lack of proof that the defendant committed the act, the issue in this case was different. Randy Herman admitted that he was the person standing over Brooke’s body with the knife, but claimed he had no memory of the killing. That meant the defense had to focus on whether he was conscious, aware, and capable of forming the intent required for first-degree murder.

Monica and Brandon analyze the key facts from the case, including the 25 stab wounds, the surveillance footage, the text messages, the neighbor who heard screams, the timeline between Randy and Brooke’s interaction and the killing, and the prosecution’s argument that there was not enough time for Randy to fall into the type of deep sleep required for the sleepwalking defense.

They also discuss the defense expert, how juries evaluate what is “possible” versus what is “reasonable,” and why the State’s trial strategy was effective. Instead of arguing that sleepwalking as a defense was impossible or ridiculous, prosecutors focused on the facts of this case and why the evidence did not support that theory.

This episode also touches on trial strategy, reasonable doubt, premeditation, motive, intoxication, emotional rage, jury perception, courtroom appearance, and how criminal defense attorneys decide which defense theory gives a client the best chance at trial.

Topics Covered

Randy Herman case
Brooke Preston case
Hulu Dead Asleep documentary
Dead Asleep case breakdown
Sleepwalking murder defense
Sleepwalking criminal defense
Palm Beach County murder case
Florida murder trial
First-degree murder defense
Intent in murder cases
Premeditation in criminal law
Reasonable doubt
Possible vs. reasonable defense theories
Criminal defense trial strategy
Forensic timeline evidence
Surveillance footage in criminal cases
Text messages as evidence
Neighbor witness testimony
Confession in a murder case
No memory defense
Criminal intent and consciousness
Sleepwalking expert testimony
Defense expert cross-examination
25 stab wounds evidence
Overkill in murder cases
Motive in murder trials
Rage killing theory
Intoxication and criminal defense
Jury perception
Courtroom appearance and bias
Defendant clothing at trial
Public defender trial strategy
Palm Beach County criminal defense
Florida criminal defense podcast
Monica Ishak
Brandon Dinetz
Come Back With a Warrant 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a DUI case in West Palm Beach?
Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683. 

In this episode of Come Back With a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down what happens when someone is arrested for the first time and wants the case dismissed, sealed, expunged, or removed from their record.

Monica and Brandon explain the difference between diversion, plea deals, deferred prosecution agreements, pretrial intervention, plea in pass agreements, DUI diversion, drug court, veterans court, mental health court, and other alternatives that can sometimes help a person avoid the full consequences of a criminal prosecution.

They also discuss why diversion can be a major win in a criminal case, especially when it gives a client a path to dismissal without having to take the risk of trial. But they also explain that not every diversion program works the same way. Some programs require no admission of guilt, while others may involve a plea, probation, court conditions, restitution, treatment, or a withhold of adjudication.

This episode also covers one of the most common questions criminal defense lawyers get: “Can I get this off my record?” Monica and Brandon explain the difference between expungement and sealing in Florida, why a dismissal matters, why a withhold of adjudication matters, and how a conviction can prevent someone from getting a case removed from their record.

They also talk about the frustrating reality that even when a case is dismissed, sealed, or expunged, private websites, news outlets, mugshot pages, YouTube videos, Facebook groups, and third-party companies may still keep arrest information online. In other words: sometimes the criminal case is legally gone, but the internet does not forget.

Topics Covered

Diversion in criminal cases
Deferred prosecution agreements
DPA criminal case meaning
Pretrial intervention
Plea in pass agreements
DUI diversion in Palm Beach County
Reckless driving reduction from DUI
Withhold of adjudication
Adjudication vs. withhold
Drug court diversion
Veterans court
Mental health court
Competency in criminal cases
First time offender programs
Domestic violence diversion
FTOP domestic violence cases
Restitution in diversion agreements
Community service and court costs
Theft course and anger management
Trial risk vs. diversion
Client control and plea decisions
Public defender vs. private attorney strategy
First-time arrest in Florida
How to get a case dismissed
Nolle prosequi
No file decision
Expungement in Florida
Sealing a criminal record in Florida
Difference between sealing and expungement
Can a dismissed case still show up online?
Mugshots and public records
Why arrests stay online
Private websites and criminal records
How a criminal case can follow you 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a DUI case in West Palm Beach?
Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683. 

In this episode of Come Back With a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz sit down with Iris Eytan, a criminal defense attorney with nearly 30 years of experience handling high-stakes and complex criminal cases, including murder trials. Iris is also the founder and CEO of Protect Ethical Prosecutors, an organization focused on addressing prosecutorial misconduct, increasing accountability, and protecting the integrity of the criminal justice system.

This conversation goes deep into what happens when prosecutors stop acting as ministers of justice and start treating criminal cases like games to be won at all costs. Iris shares how her career evolved from public defense and civil rights advocacy into complex criminal defense work, and how repeated experiences with hidden evidence, high-profile cases, and alleged prosecutorial misconduct ultimately pushed her to leave practicing law and focus on systemic reform.

Monica, Brandon, and Iris discuss the emotional weight of defending clients in cases where the evidence does not add up, the pressure prosecutors face in high-profile cases, and why concealing favorable evidence can destroy lives, harm victims, and undermine public trust in the justice system. Iris also explains why prosecutor accountability is so difficult, including the role of prosecutorial immunity and the lack of meaningful consequences when misconduct occurs.

The episode also covers the Barry Morphew case, the founding mission behind Protect Ethical Prosecutors, the difference between tough prosecution and unethical prosecution, and why fairness — not conviction rates — should be the true measure of success in the criminal justice system.

Topics Covered

Prosecutorial misconduct
Ethical prosecutors
Protect Ethical Prosecutors
Iris Eytan
Monica Ishak
Brandon Dinetz
Come Back With a Warrant
Wrongful convictions
Criminal defense attorney
Public defender experience
High-profile criminal cases
Hidden evidence in criminal cases
Exculpatory evidence
Favorable evidence
Brady violations
Prosecutor accountability
Prosecutorial immunity
Absolute immunity for prosecutors
Misconduct in murder cases
Barry Morphew case
Suzanne Morphew case
Criminal justice reform
Wrongful imprisonment
DNA evidence and alternate suspects
Public trust in the justice system
Ethics over winning
Minister of justice
Prosecutors and conviction culture
Why prosecutors should disclose evidence
How misconduct affects victims and defendants
Systemic reform in criminal law 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a DUI case in West Palm Beach?
Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.