Can you get a DUI if you weren’t even driving?
In Florida—especially here in West Palm Beach and South Florida—the answer might surprise you.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinitz break down one of the most misunderstood areas of Florida DUI law: what actually counts as “driving.”

With Memorial Day weekend approaching, this is essential listening if you plan on going out, boating, or celebrating.

⚖️ What You’ll Learn in This Episode
What “actual physical control” means under Florida DUI law
Why you can get a DUI while parked or sleeping in your car
Whether you can get a DUI on a golf cart, scooter, bicycle, or horse
The difference between a DUI (driving under the influence) and a BUI (boating under the influence)
How prosecutors prove DUI cases in Palm Beach County courts
What happens if you refuse a breath test in Florida (new law updates)
Real case examples where DUI charges were fought and dismissed
🚨 2025–2026 Florida DUI Law Updates

We also cover key changes affecting drivers in West Palm Beach and throughout Florida, including:

Increased penalties for BUI manslaughter
New consequences for refusing breath tests
Enhanced penalties tied to controlled substances
How DUI charges can escalate quickly—even for first-time offenders
💸 The Real Cost of a DUI in South Florida

A DUI is more than just a charge—it can impact your:

Driver’s license
Insurance rates
Employment opportunities
Criminal record (permanent in Florida)

Many DUI cases cost $10,000+ when you factor in fines, classes, and legal fees.

📍 Why This Matters in West Palm Beach

South Florida is one of the most active areas for DUI and BUI enforcement, especially around:

Holidays (like Memorial Day, New Year’s, and Spring Break)
Boating events and waterfront gatherings
Late-night dining and nightlife areas

Law enforcement is actively looking for impaired drivers—and many arrests happen when people think they’re being “safe.”

🎯 If You’ve Been Arrested for DUI in West Palm Beach

Every case is fact-specific. Even if you think:

“I wasn’t driving”
“I was just parked”
“There’s no proof”

There may still be defenses available.

🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 

📞 Need help with a DUI case in West Palm Beach?
Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683. 

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down one of the most controversial true crime cases in modern history: Making a Murderer — and the convictions of Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey.

After being wrongfully imprisoned for 18 years and later exonerated by DNA, Steven Avery filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit against law enforcement. Just two years later, he was charged again — this time for the murder of Teresa Halbach.

But what turned this case into a national debate wasn’t just the evidence — it was the confession of Brendan Dassey.

A 16-year-old with cognitive limitations, interrogated without a lawyer or parent present, whose statements became central to the prosecution.

🔑 What We Cover:
The timeline of Steven Avery’s wrongful conviction and second arrest
The controversy surrounding Brendan Dassey’s confession
Police interrogation tactics — and when they cross the line
How false confessions happen (especially with juveniles)
The legal standard: what makes a confession “voluntary”?
The difference between moral belief vs. legal burden of proof
Claims of evidence tampering and chain of custody issues
Why this case still divides public opinion years later
⚖️ Key Legal Issues:
Voluntariness of Confessions: Was Brendan’s confession truly voluntary under the “totality of the circumstances”?
Juvenile Protections: How age, IQ, and lack of counsel impact constitutional rights
Police Tactics: Law enforcement can legally lie during interrogations — but should they?
Burden of Proof: Even if something feels wrong… did the state still meet its burden?
💡 Key Takeaways:
Confessions are powerful — but not always reliable.
Juveniles are significantly more vulnerable during interrogations.
The legal system doesn’t decide what feels true — only what can be proven.
Even controversial cases can still meet the legal threshold for conviction.
This case highlights the tension between justice and procedure. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 

What happens when family law and criminal law collide?

In this two-part episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon sit down with experienced family law attorney Heather Stolman to break down the real-life chaos that unfolds when divorce, custody battles, and domestic violence allegations intersect with the criminal justice system.

From “he said, she said” domestic violence cases to strategic use of injunctions in family court, this conversation exposes how legal strategy, emotion, and evidence all collide—and sometimes backfire.

⚖️ WHAT YOU’LL LEARN
The key differences between family court vs criminal court standards
Why domestic violence cases are so difficult to prove
How allegations can impact divorce, custody, and time-sharing
When people use domestic violence claims as legal leverage
How judges determine the “best interest of the child”
The role of evidence, text messages, and video footage in court
Why DCF recommendations don’t always control custody decisions
The reality of no-contact orders, injunctions, and overlapping cases
How mental health and guardianship intersect with criminal cases
What lawyers see behind the scenes in the most complex family disputes
🔥 REAL TOPICS DISCUSSED
Domestic violence cases as “he said, she said” battles
The strategic use (and misuse) of restraining orders and injunctions
Custody complications when criminal charges are pending
The impact of video evidence vs allegations in court
“Baby mama drama,” paternity disputes, and high-conflict co-parenting
The psychological realities of abuse, fear, and recanting statements
How multiple legal systems (family, criminal, guardianship) can overlap
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS

These cases aren’t just legal—they’re emotional, strategic, and often life-altering.

Understanding how family law and criminal law interact can make the difference between protecting your rights and unintentionally hurting your case.

📌 KEY TAKEAWAY

When family and criminal cases overlap, everything becomes more complicated—and what you say, text, or file in one court can directly impact the other. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz sit down with veteran South Florida family law attorney Heather Greenhill Stohlman to unpack the complex — and often chaotic — intersection of family law and criminal law.

With over 20 years of experience, Heather shares what really happens behind divorce cases, custody battles, and domestic violence allegations — including how these cases often overlap with criminal charges and Department of Children and Families (DCF) involvement.

From high-conflict divorces to allegations used as leverage, this episode dives into the emotional, strategic, and legal realities attorneys face when families break down.

🔑 What We Cover:
How family law and criminal law cases overlap (more than you think)
When domestic violence allegations are real vs. used as leverage
The role of DCF, guardian ad litems, and the courts in protecting children
Why judges are getting smarter about manipulation in family court
What actually qualifies as a legal “emergency” in family law
The emotional impact of divorce and litigation on children
How attorneys navigate highly sensitive abuse allegations
Financial abuse and new legal remedies in family court
The reality of litigating custody when addiction, mental health, or crime is involved
Why family law is anything but “just divorce”
💡 Key Takeaways:
Family court is often a strategic battlefield — not just emotional.
Domestic violence claims can significantly impact custody and leverage in litigation.
Children are often the most affected — and sometimes unintentionally used as leverage.
Not everything is an “emergency” in court — and misusing that label can hurt your case.
Collaboration between criminal and family law attorneys is critical in overlapping cases.
🎙️ About Our Guest:

Heather Greenhill Stohlman is a founding partner of Greenhill Stohlman, P.A., with over two decades of experience in marital and family law. She focuses on complex cases involving financial analysis, custody disputes, and high-conflict litigation, often working alongside forensic accountants, therapists, and other experts to support her clients. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18

In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down cross-examination—the trial skill that can change the entire case in the middle of trial. They explain how defense attorneys can win cases without calling a single witness by using the government’s witnesses to build reasonable doubt and tell the defense story through tight, controlled questions.

🧠 What you’ll learn

Why cross-examination is an art (and how it becomes your “conversation with the jury”)

How defense wins without a case-in-chief: no burden + strategic cross

The golden rule: never ask a question you don’t know the answer to

How to cross a police officer in “after-the-fact” cases (like domestic calls)

The difference between misdemeanor cross vs major investigation cross (DUIs, violent felonies, detectives)

How to expose what a witness didn’t see, didn’t do, or left out

Demeanor matters: don’t go “hot” unless the jury gives you permission

How judges stepping in can destroy a witness’s credibility in front of jurors

Why “smoking gun” movie moments are rare—and when to save it for closing

Impeachment: the most satisfying (and effective) cross tool when done right

Bonus: jury panels, mistrials, and why retrials often benefit the prosecution

⚖️ Key takeaway

Cross-examination is one of the fastest ways to create reasonable doubt—through conflicts in evidence, lack of evidence, and credibility problems—without ever putting your own witness on the stand. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             
Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  

What this episode is about 🤝

In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down why collaboration over competition is one of the most underrated strategies in the legal industry—especially for criminal defense lawyers and solo firm owners.

Key topics covered ✅

Why “competing for cases” is a short-term mindset—and what the long game actually looks like

How to choose the right collaborators (alignment, trust, goals, and business model)

The role ego plays in keeping lawyers isolated (and why that hurts growth)

How collaboration builds credibility, reputation, and referral power in a small legal community

Co-counseling across jurisdictions: why local knowledge + trial strategy = better outcomes

The danger of “cheap lawyer” branding and race-to-the-bottom pricing

Why talking badly about other lawyers damages your own brand more than theirs

How collaboration ultimately benefits clients: more eyes, stronger strategy, better service

Takeaway 💡

Collaboration isn’t just “being friendly.” It’s a business strategy, a reputation builder, and a client-focused advantage—when you do it with the right people. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 

In Episode 3 of the Come Back With a Warrant Epstein Files series, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz tackle the conspiracy theories surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death, the Epstein files, and the larger questions the public still can’t shake.

We break down the biggest theories people are debating right now—from whether Epstein is truly dead, to whether he was murdered, to the “body swap” theory that gained new attention after online posts and investigative interest tied to the jail where he was held.

We also revisit why Epstein’s role as a potential kompromat collector matters: if he held compromising material on powerful people, that creates strong motives for keeping him alive, silencing him, or preventing a trial from ever happening.

Finally, we talk about how misinformation, AI, and narrative control make it harder than ever to separate fact from viral fiction—and why doing your own research matters in a case this big.

Topics We Cover

Recap of Episodes 1–2 and how we got here in the Epstein Files series

The core question: Is Epstein dead or alive?

If he’s dead: suicide vs. homicide and why so many people question the official story

The federal facility where Epstein died (MDC) and why the “camera failure” explanation fuels skepticism

The independent autopsy dispute and why it matters to public trust

The body swap theory and why it keeps resurfacing

Why Epstein’s “tools to disappear” (fake passports, diamonds) matter to the debate

Kompromat: what it is and why it changes the motive analysis

The theory that Epstein was connected to intelligence networks (CIA/Mossad/Russia) and what would make him “too valuable”

“Coded language” theories (pizza/jerky, etc.) and how to approach claims critically

How AI and fake videos/photos are muddying the waters in real time

Ghislaine Maxwell, reputation laundering, and the role of “philanthropy as cover” (ex: Terramar)

Why this story won’t end: ongoing releases, global fallout, and unanswered questions

Key Questions We Explore

Why would Epstein be “worth” protecting—or eliminating?

If kompromat existed, where is it now and who controls it?

Why are major pieces of evidence still missing or redacted?

How do you separate real information from viral misinformation in 2026? Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 

In Episode 2 of the Come Back With a Warrant Epstein Files series, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz dig into the latest Epstein file releases and what they actually reveal.

Millions of pages of documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are being released to the public following new transparency measures. But instead of one simple “list,” the files contain emails, depositions, witness statements, investigative materials, and civil litigation records spanning years of investigations.

In this episode, we break down where these documents come from, how to interpret the names appearing in them, and why Epstein’s connections to powerful industries and institutions continue to raise questions.

We also discuss the concept of kompromat—the idea that Epstein may have collected compromising material on influential individuals—and how that theory fits into the broader allegations surrounding his network.

Finally, we explore Epstein’s connections to Ghislaine Maxwell, her father Robert Maxwell, and the powerful circles Epstein operated within, from global finance to politics.

Topics Covered

What the Epstein Files Transparency Act means and why documents are now being released

The types of records included in the Epstein files:

Civil lawsuits

Depositions

Victim statements

FBI investigative materials

Emails and communications

Why being named in the files does not automatically mean someone committed a crime

Epstein’s connections to powerful individuals across finance, tech, and politics

The concept of kompromat and how compromising material can be used for leverage

Allegations about surveillance systems inside Epstein’s properties

Epstein’s unusual connections to the Department of Justice

The role of Kathryn Ruemmler and negotiations involving international banking investigations

The influence of Ghislaine Maxwell and her father Robert Maxwell, a controversial media tycoon

How Epstein’s network expanded internationally

Why the case evolved from a Palm Beach investigation to a global scandal

Key Questions We Explore

Why were so many powerful people connected to Epstein?

What role did Ghislaine Maxwell play in expanding Epstein’s network?

Did Epstein collect compromising material on influential figures?

Why are so many documents still redacted?

Will more people ever be prosecuted?

Coming Next: Episode 3

In the final episode of the series, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz tackle the conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein.

They’ll break down:

Which theories have actual evidence behind them

Which ones have already been debunked

The biggest unanswered questions that still remain Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 

Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz kick off a three-part deep dive into Jeffrey Epstein and the Epstein files by starting where the public story first breaks open: Palm Beach County. This episode walks through how the investigation began in 2005, why the Palm Beach Police Department believed they had a strong case, and how the process shifted when the State Attorney’s Office chose a grand jury route that produced only one solicitation charge. They then unpack how the case moved to federal authorities, why Epstein’s defense team became pivotal, and how a federal non-prosecution agreement ultimately shielded Epstein—and “named and unnamed” co-conspirators—from federal charges.

Key Topics Covered

Why listeners requested Epstein—and why Palm Beach’s role matters

The 2005 origin story: Royal Palm Beach High School incident leads to a police tip

Palm Beach Police Department interviews 30+ victims and identifies a recruiting “pipeline”

Florida law and consent: why minors legally cannot consent (even if they appear to agree)

The State Attorney’s Office decision to use a grand jury—and why that raised eyebrows

Why a grand jury usually indicts easily (“ham sandwich” concept) and what went differently here

How witness credibility was attacked (MySpace/social media) and why volume/pattern evidence matters

Search warrants executed after the case is already “hot”—and evidence appears removed

Who likely knew about the warrants (and why “tip-offs” are central to the controversy)

The case gets sent to the FBI / federal authorities “over the head” of state prosecutors

Epstein’s “super defense team,” the Acosta meeting, and how the federal case disappears

The non-prosecution agreement: plea to state charges + federal immunity for co-conspirators

Victims’ rights: how victims were not notified and later litigation under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act

Epstein’s sentence and special privileges: work release, travel, and unusually lenient enforcement

Bigger takeaway: how power, money, and influence can distort outcomes in the justice system

Preview of Episode 2: document dumps, co-conspirators, and fallout

Notable Takeaways / Key Moments

The investigation allegedly revealed a consistent pattern: massage → undressing → escalation

The episode highlights a legal tension: minors recruited other minors, blurring roles socially—but not legally

A major theme: evidence appears to have been removed before warrants were served

Epstein’s post-plea reality contrasts sharply with typical sex-offender supervision and restrictions This episode discusses allegations of sexual abuse involving minors, exploitation, and failures within the justice system. Listener discretion advised. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 

In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, Brandon Dinetz and Monica Ishak break down consciousness of guilt—the “guilty mind” argument prosecutors use when a defendant’s post-incident behavior looks suspicious. They explain how the State uses circumstantial evidence like fleeing, disposing evidence, lying to police, and DUI refusals to argue: “Why would an innocent person do that?”

They also cover what the State cannot use as consciousness of guilt—like invoking the right to remain silent, requesting a lawyer, or searching for an attorney—because those are protected by the 5th and 6th Amendments.

To illustrate how powerful (and limited) this evidence can be, they discuss the Casey Anthony case, including the prosecution’s reliance on circumstantial evidence like internet searches (chloroform), alleged forensic indicators, and post-event lies—alongside the defense’s ability to create reasonable doubt (including issues like a shared family computer).

In this episode, we cover:

What consciousness of guilt means in criminal cases

The difference between mens rea (criminal intent) and post-crime behavior evidence

Common examples: running from police, leaving the scene, disposing evidence, lying

DUI examples: refusing breath/blood tests and why prosecutors highlight refusals

What the State cannot argue (silence, lawyer requests, attorney searches)

Casey Anthony as a case study in circumstantial proof and reasonable doubt

Why consciousness-of-guilt evidence is often subjective and jury-dependent

How defense attorneys “break apart” the State’s narrative to create reasonable doubt

Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             
Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                              Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18